Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritization Must be Driven byScience

Pages
305–306
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Talbotfrom ACIP that it is incumbent upon physicians to protect the welfare of patients and do no harm, particularly inthe absence of data regarding potential side effects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices(ACIP) recently voted 13 to one to prioritize the disposition of the COVID-19 vaccine first to healthcare workersand residents at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) (1).
📊
Key Findings & Data:ACIP decision is contradictory, as it was guided by the ethicalprinciples to “maximize benefits and minimize harms” while simultaneously citing that “LTCF residents have notbeen specifically studied” (2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Talbotfrom ACIP that it is incumbent upon physicians to protect the welfare of patients and do no harm, particularly inthe absence of data regarding potential side effects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices(ACIP) recently voted 13 to one to prioritize the disposition of the COVID-19 vaccine first to healthcare workersand residents at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) (1). ACIP decision is contradictory, as it was guided by the ethicalprinciples to “maximize benefits and minimize harms” while simultaneously citing that “LTCF residents have notbeen specifically studied” (2). The American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Ethics on allocating limited healthcare resources states that physicians have a responsibility to contribute their expertise to develop “allocation poli cies that are fair and safeguard the welfare of patients”, and “use an objective, flexible, transparent mechanismto determine which patients will receive the resource(s) when there are not substantial differences among patientswho need access to the scarce resource(s)” (3). We, therefore, agree with the dissenting vote made by Dr. Talbotfrom ACIP that it is incumbent upon physicians to protect the welfare of patients and do no harm, particularly inthe absence of data regarding potential side effects.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİNER, H., YALE, S. H., YALE, E. S., MAZZA, J. J. (2022). COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritization Must be Driven byScience. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 305–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/502236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Cohen J. CDC advisory panel takes first shot at prioritizing who gets the first shots of COVID-19 vaccines. Available from: URL: https:// www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/cdc-advisory-panel-takes-firstshot-prioritizing-who-gets-first-shots-covid-19-vaccines
  2. Dooling K, McClung N, Chamberland M, Marin M, Wallace M, Bell BP, et al. The advisory committee on immunization practices’ interim recommendation for allocating initial supplies of COVID-19 vaccine-United States, 2020. CDC 2020; 69(49): 1857–9. 3. [No author]. Chapter 11.1.2 - Physician Stewardship of Health Care Resources. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, 2016. Available from: URL:
  3. Branswell H. CDC advisory panel’s lone dissenter on why longterm care residents shouldn’t receive COVID-19 vaccine first. Stat. 2020 Dec 3. Available from: URL: https://www.statnews. com/2020/12/03/cdc-advisory-panels-lone-dissenter-on-whylong-term-care-residents-shouldnt-receive-covid-19-vaccine-first/
  4. Saade E, Canaday DH, Davidson HE, Han LF, Gravenstein S. Special considerations for vaccines and the elderly. In: Vaccinations. Poland GA, editor. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019.p.35–53.