Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Effectiveness of Partial Fistula Tract Excision with Loose Seton Implantation to Treat Perianal Fistula

Pages
167–172
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated that partial fistula tract excision and loose seton implantation remains the primary treatment method of choice due to the low rate of recurrence and incontinence coupled with high patient satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Perianal fistula is an anorectal disease that can significantly impair quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients with a primary or recurrent perianal fistula who underwent a partial fistulectomy with loose seton placement at a single clinic between January 2015 and March 2020 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated that partial fistula tract excision and loose seton implantation remains the primary treatment method of choice due to the low rate of recurrence and incontinence coupled with high patient satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Perianal fistula is an anorectal disease that can significantly impair quality of life. The course of the disease can include chronic exacerbation and recurrence. Many surgical techniques have been developed to treat perianal fistula, but reappearance of the fistula is still a major problem. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the results of partial fistula tract excision (partial fistulectomy) and loose seton application in the treatment of primary and recurrent perianal fistula. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients with a primary or recurrent perianal fistula who underwent a partial fistulectomy with loose seton placement at a single clinic between January 2015 and March 2020 were included. Clinical and demographic characteristics including the fistula location, postoperative recurrence, anal incontinence, and satisfaction rate were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Of the 42 patients, 15 were female and 27 were male. The mean age was 43.4±13.1 years and the median follow-up period was 10 months (range: 5–21 months). No statistically significant difference in disease recurrence was found in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking, abscess history, fistula type, or primary/ recurrence status (p>0.05). Total anal incontinence did not develop in any patient during the follow-up period. Recurrence of perianal fistula was observed in 2 patients (4.8%). Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated that partial fistula tract excision and loose seton implantation remains the primary treatment method of choice due to the low rate of recurrence and incontinence coupled with high patient satisfaction.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMAN, K., DEMİR, H., KAHRAMAN, Y. S., ERCAN, M., SUBAŞI, Ö., AZİRET, M., BİRİCİK, A. (2022). Effectiveness of Partial Fistula Tract Excision with Loose Seton Implantation to Treat Perianal Fistula. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 167–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/502154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cadeddu F, Salis F, Lisi G, Ciangola I, Milito G. Complex anal fistula remains a challenge for colorectal surgeon. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30(5): 595–603
  2. Williams G, Williams A, Tozer P, Phillips R, Ahmad A, Jayne D, et al. The treatment of anal fistula: second ACPGBI Position Statement - 2018. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 Suppl 3: 5–31
  3. Cheung XC, Fahey T, Rogers AC, Pemberton JH, Kavanagh DO. Surgical management of idiopathic perianal fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 2021; 38(2): 104–19
  4. Parks AG, Stitz RW. The treatment of high fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1976; 19(6): 487–99
  5. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36(1): 77–97
  6. Villiger R, Cabalzar-Wondberg D, Zeller D, Frei P, Biedermann L, Schneider C, et al. Perianal fistulodesis - A pilot study of a novel minimally invasive surgical and medical approach for closure of perianal fistulae. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021; 13(2): 187–97
  7. Akici M, Ersen O. The effect of suture selection in complex anal fistulas on the success of cutting seton placement and patient comfort. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36(4): 816–20
  8. Vergara-Fernandez O, Espino-Urbina LA. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: what is the evidence in a review? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(40): 6805–13
  9. Handaya AY, Fauzi AR. Combined fistulotomy and contralateral anal internal sphincterotomy for recurrent and complex anal fistula to prevent recurrence. Ann Coloproctol 2020; 36(2): 122–7
  10. Demirel AH. The cutting seton technique with the tractus medialisation in the long tractus anal fistula (New technical description). J Surg Arts 2016; 9(2): 57–60
  11. Chaveli Diaz C, Esquiroz Lizaur I, Marzo Virto J, Oteiza Martínez F, Gonzalez Álvarez G, de Miguel Velasco M, et al. Fistulectomy and endorectal advancement flap repair for cryptoglandular anal fistula: recurrence and functional outcome over 10 years of follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36(4): 841–6
  12. Bleier JI, Moloo H, Goldberg SM. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: an effective new technique for complex fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53(1): 43–6
  13. Zhao B, Wang Z, Han J, Zheng Y, Cui J, Yu S. Long-term outcomes of ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract plus bioprosthetic anal fistula plug (LIFT-Plug) in the treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistula. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25: 1350–4
  14. Andreou C, Zeindler J, Oertli D, Misteli H. Longterm