Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

The Effectiveness of Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Pages
312–327
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results indicated that denosumab is an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, additional randomized controlled studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of long-term denosumab treatment and prior bisphosphonate use.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of denosumab to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis, and the impact of prior osteoporosis drug use and the duration of denosumab use on the success of the treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In all, 116 patients who had been diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis and were treated with denosumab were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results indicated that denosumab is an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, additional randomized controlled studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of long-term denosumab treatment and prior bisphosphonate use.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of denosumab to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis, and the impact of prior osteoporosis drug use and the duration of denosumab use on the success of the treatment. Materials and Methods: In all, 116 patients who had been diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis and were treated with denosumab were enrolled in the study. The primary study groups were those who had used oral bisphosphonates before denosumab treatment (n=88) and those who had not (n=28). The outcome measures were the L1-L4 lumbar vertebra, total femur, and femoral neck T-scores, and bone mineral density (BMD) values. All of the patients were evaluated pre-treatment and again at 1 and 2 years after denosumab treatment. Results: Significant improvements were seen in the total vertebral BMD and T-scores, total femur, and femoral neck BMD and T-scores in both patient groups 1 year after treatment. The total lumbar vertebra BMD and T-scores were statistically significantly higher in the group that had not used oral bisphosphonates compared with those of the group that had used oral bisphosphonates. The total femur and femoral neck BMD and T-scores were also significantly higher after 2 years of use of denosumab in comparison with the results at 1 year of use. Conclusion: The results indicated that denosumab is an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, additional randomized controlled studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of long-term denosumab treatment and prior bisphosphonate use.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAS, B., KUZU, Ö. (2022). The Effectiveness of Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 312–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/502149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY; Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 2019; 30(1): 3–44
  2. Fuggle NR, Curtis EM, Ward KA, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019; 15(9): 535–47
  3. Chau YT, Nashi N, Law LS, Goh RKH, Choo SX, et al. Undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture: a retrospective, observational study in Singapore. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15(1): 141
  4. Anupama DS, Norohna JA, Acharya KK, Ravishankar, George A. Effect of exercise on bone mineral density and quality of life among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis without fracture: A systematic review. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 2020; 39: 100796
  5. Deeks ED. Denosumab: A Review in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Aging 2018; 35(2): 163–73
  6. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, et al; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2009; 361(8): 756–65
  7. Wu J, Zhang Q, Yan G, Jin X. Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13(1): 194
  8. Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R, Cummings SR, et al. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5(7): 513–23
  9. Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, Kendler DL, Miller PD, Yang YC, et al. Effects of denosumab treatment and discontinuation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96(4): 972–80
  10. Pang KL, Low NY, Chin KY. A Review on the role of denosumab in fracture prevention. Drug Des Devel Ther 2020; 14: 4029–51
  11. Anastasilakis AD, Makras P, Yavropoulou MP, Tabacco G, Naciu AM, Palermo A. denosumab discontinuation and the rebound phenomenon: A narrative review. J Clin Med 2021; 10(1): 152
  12. Reid IR, Miller PD, Brown JP, Kendler DL, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Valter I, et al; Denosumab Phase 3 Bone Histology Study Group. Effects of denosumab on bone histomorph