Journals / ENT Updates / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

An Overview of Vagal Paraganglioma Surgery: Evaluation of Operative Morbidities and Quality of Life After Surgery

Pages
153–159
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Trying to protect the vagus nerve by dissecting it as much as possible and rehabilitation with Isshiki type 1 thyroplasty in case of aspiration are key points.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To analyze postoperative morbidity and quality of life of surgically treated patients for vagal paraganglioma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Of the 11 patients, 8 were women and 3 were men with an age distribution of 22-70 (mean age, 49.9 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Trying to protect the vagus nerve by dissecting it as much as possible and rehabilitation with Isshiki type 1 thyroplasty in case of aspiration are key points.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To analyze postoperative morbidity and quality of life of surgically treated patients for vagal paraganglioma. Methods: Preoperative symptoms and findings, presence of cranial nerve paralysis, radiological findings, surgical techniques, perioperative, and postoperative complications were analyzed retrospectively. Washington University Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) was used to evaluate the quality of life of the patients. Results: Of the 11 patients, 8 were women and 3 were men with an age distribution of 22-70 (mean age, 49.9 years). Two patients had vocal cord paralysis and 1 patient had hypoglossal nerve paresis preoperatively. In 5 patients, the vagus nerve was partially resected; vocal cord movements recovered within 6 months in 2 out of 5 (40%). The continuity of the nerve could not be preserved in the remaining 6 patients, Ishiki type 1 medialization thyroplasty was performed in 4 (44.4%). In 3 patients, the hypoglossal nerve was invaded by the tumor and was sacrificed. Temporary facial paresis occurred in 3 patients who were operated on with transcervical-transparotid approach. Complete recovery was achieved in all within 3 months. In a patient with an extensively large tumor, carotid bypass surgery was performed with the saphenous vein. Except for one patient, the mean scores of all patients were above 90 with UW-QOL. Conclusion: Surgery, which is the only curative treatment method, may not cause a significant change in the postoperative quality of life in well-selected cases. Trying to protect the vagus nerve by dissecting it as much as possible and rehabilitation with Isshiki type 1 thyroplasty in case of aspiration are key points.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞARAN, B., ÜNSALER, S., ŞEN, C., KILIÇ, H. (2022). An Overview of Vagal Paraganglioma Surgery: Evaluation of Operative Morbidities and Quality of Life After Surgery. ENT Updates, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 153–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/501397

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Wasserman PG, Savargaonkar P. Paragangliomas: classification, pathology, and differential diagnosis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001
  2. 34(5):845-862. [CrossRef] 2. Myssiorek D. Head and neck paragangliomas: an overview. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001
  3. 34(5):829-836. [CrossRef] 3. Weymuller EA Jr, Yueh B, Deleyiannis FW, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2000
  4. 110(3 Pt 3):4-7. [CrossRef] 4. Senkal HA, Hayran M, Karakaya E, et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012
  5. 33(4):417-426. [CrossRef] 5. Kimura N, Capella C, Gill A, et al. Vagal Paraganglioma. In: El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, eds. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumors. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC
  6. Day TA, Albergotti WG. Neoplasms of the neck. In: Flint PW, Francis HW, Haughey BH, et al., eds. Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier
  7. Netterville JL, Jackson CG, Miller FR, Wanamaker JR, Glasscock ME. Vagal paraganglioma: a review of 46 patients treated during a 20-year period. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998
  8. 124(10):1133- 1140. [CrossRef] 8. Miller FR, Wanamaker JR, Lavertu P, Wood BG. Magnetic resonance imaging and the management of parapharyngeal space tumors. Head Neck. 1996
  9. 18(1):67-77. [CrossRef] 9. Olsen WL, Dillon WP, Kelly WM, et al. MR imaging of paragangliomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987
  10. 148(1):201-204. [CrossRef] 10. Wang X, Chen Y, Chen X, Xian J. Parapharyngeal space paraganglioma: distinguishing vagal paragangliomas from carotid body tumours using standard MRI. Clin Radiol. 2019
  11. 74(9):734.e1-734.e6. [CrossRef] 11. Tikkakoski T, Luotonen J, Leinonen S, et al. Preoperative embolization in the management of neck paragangliomas. Laryngoscope. 1997
  12. 107(6):821-826. [CrossRef] 12. Ward PH, Liu C, Vinuela F, Bentson JR. Embolization: an adjunctive measure for removal of carotid body tumors. Laryngoscope. 1988
  13. 98(12):1287-1291. [CrossRef] 13. Chan JKC, Kimura N, Capella C, et al. Paraganglion tumors. In: El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, eds. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC
  14. Cohen SM, Burkey BB, Netterville JL. Surgical management of parapharyngeal space masses. Head Neck. 2005
  15. 27(8):669-675. [CrossRef] 15. Basaran B, Polat B, Unsaler S, et al. Parapharyngeal