Journals / Ekonomik Yaklaşım / 2007 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 63

The Messianic Charisma: How and for Whom it Operates

Pages
113–125
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The net-like organized body 'matures' as the actual Subject of depersonalised-bureaucratised hegemony under the person and persona of the charismatic leader whose 'remote' presence does not reach to the factual working of the power —just as it is in his/her absence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The extent of depersonalised power of charisma in political entities is the main theme of this article.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The very power is reified both not by and not for the person of charisma but by and for a corporate body.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The net-like organized body 'matures' as the actual Subject of depersonalised-bureaucratised hegemony under the person and persona of the charismatic leader whose 'remote' presence does not reach to the factual working of the power —just as it is in his/her absence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The extent of depersonalised power of charisma in political entities is the main theme of this article. Although Max Weber partly articulated the particular 'phase' of the phenomenon under 'routinized charisma', the non-individual aspect of the power of charisma has no deserving attention in the related literature. The paper aims to contribute to the theorisations on charisma in political organisations in terms of the 'how' of its functioning. It argues that the 'unbridled-awesome' power is in effect a non-individual phenomenon. The very power is reified both not by and not for the person of charisma but by and for a corporate body. The net-like organized body 'matures' as the actual Subject of depersonalised-bureaucratised hegemony under the person and persona of the charismatic leader whose 'remote' presence does not reach to the factual working of the power —just as it is in his/her absence.

Özet

Politik oluşumlarda, karizma sahibinin kişiliğinden bağımsızlaştırılmış karizma gücünün kapsamı, bu makalenin temel temasıdır. Fenomenin bu özel 'aşama'sını 'rutinleşmiş karizma' kavramsallaştırmasıyla Max Weber bir ölçüde ifadelendirmesine rağmen, karizma gücünün kişilik-ötesi boyutu ilgili literatürde hakkı ölçüsünde yer bulmamıştır. Bu makale, politik örgütlenmelerde karizma gücü üzerine yapılmış teorik çalışmalara, pratik güce dönüşmesinin ' nasıl 'ı anlamında bir katkı yapmayı amaçlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, A. K. (2022). The Messianic Charisma: How and for Whom it Operates. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 63, 113–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/499776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. AKIN, Fahamet, (2002).
  2. Kalitatif Tercih Modelleri, Ekin Kitapevi, Bursa. AKTAN, Coşkun Can, (2005). "Vergi Psikolojisinin Temelleri ve Vergi Ahlaki", yayımlanmamış makale, www.canaktan.org/ekonomi/kamu_maliyesi/ vergi-psiko/vergi-psik.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ağustos 2006)
  3. ALLINGHAM M.G., SANDMO, A. (1972). "Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis", Journal of Public Economics, Vol: 1, 323-338.
  4. ANDREONİ, James, ERARD Brian, FEINSTEİN Jonathan. (1998). "Tax Compliance", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol:36: 818-860
  5. BELKAUI Ahmed Riahi (2004). "Relationship Between Tax Compliance Internationally and Selected Determinants of Tax Morale", Journal on International Accounting& Auditing and Taxation, Vol:20. BROOKS, Neil (2001). "Key Issues in Income Tax: Challenges of Tax Administration and Compliance", Assian Development Bank, 2001 Tax Conferance 8 September. COWELL, Frank Alan. (1992). "Tax Evasion and Inequity", Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol: 13, s.521-543.
  6. DOĞAN, Ismail (2000). Sosyoloji: Kavramlar ve Sorunlar, İstanbul:
  7. Sistem Yayıncılık. ELFFERS, Henk, (2000). But taxpayers do cooperate! In:VanVugt, M., Snyder, M., Tyler, T. R., Biel, A. (Eds.), Cooperation in Modern Society. Promoting the Welfare of Communities, States and Organizations. Routledge, London pp. 184-194.
  8. ERARD, Brian, FEINSTEIN, Jonathan S. (1994). "The Role of Moral Sentiments and Audit Perceptions in Tax Compliance", Puplic Finance, 49(4): 70-89.
  9. EUROPEAN VALUES STUDY (2006). http://www.europeanvalues.n1/index2.htm.
  10. FALKİNGER, Josef. (1995). "Tax evasion, consumption of public goods and fairness". Journal of Economic Psychology, 16: 63-72.
  11. GRIFFITHS, William E., HILL, R. Carter, JUDGE, George G. (1993).
  12. Learning and Practicing Econometrics, John Wiley& Sons, inc., United States of America. GUJARATI, Damador, (1995).
  13. Basic Econometrics, Literatür Yayıncılık, Third Edition,
  14. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York. GÜRİŞ, Selahattin, ÇAĞLAYAN, Ebru, (2000).
  15. Ekonometri, Temel Kavramlar, Der Yayınları: 282, İstanbul.
  16. GÜTH, Werner, LEVATİ, Vittoria, SAUSGRUBER, Rupert (2005). "Tax Morale and (de)Centralization: An Experimental Study, Public Choice, 125, 171-178.
  17. HASSELDINE, John (2000). "Using Persuasive Comminications to Incease Tax Compiance: What Experimental Reserach Has (and has not) Told Us, Australian Tax Forum, 15:227-224.
  18. HASSELDINE, John, Li ZHUHONG (1999). "More Tax Evasion Resarch in new Milennium", Crime, Law& Social Change 31:91-104.
  19. KIRCHER Erich, MACIEJOVKY Boris, SCHNEIDER Friedrich