SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomik Yaklaşım / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 81

Fiscal sociology as an alternative approach to the public finance: Pioneers

"Maliye"ye alternatif bir yaklaşım olarak mali sosyoloji: Öncüler

Mesut SERT
Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article the neoclassical public finance approach that addresses financial issues by reducing it in technical field and by breaking it up from its social^and historical context will be evaluated critically by the standpoints of Goldscheid, Schumpeter and O'Connor who could be taken as pioneers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article, as an alternative approach to the public finance which is about fiscal sociology is started from the differences between the Continental Europe and Anglo-Saxon tradition wherein the public finance emerged as an independent discipline.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It asserts that this discrepancy in emergence continuum is decisive in contemporary public finance discipline.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article the neoclassical public finance approach that addresses financial issues by reducing it in technical field and by breaking it up from its social^and historical context will be evaluated critically by the standpoints of Goldscheid, Schumpeter and O'Connor who could be taken as pioneers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article, as an alternative approach to the public finance which is about fiscal sociology is started from the differences between the Continental Europe and Anglo-Saxon tradition wherein the public finance emerged as an independent discipline. It asserts that this discrepancy in emergence continuum is decisive in contemporary public finance discipline. In this article the neoclassical public finance approach that addresses financial issues by reducing it in technical field and by breaking it up from its social^and historical context will be evaluated critically by the standpoints of Goldscheid, Schumpeter and O'Connor who could be taken as pioneers.

Özet

Maliye'ye eleştirel bir yaklaşım olan mali sosyolojiyi üzerine olan bu çalışma, bir disiplin olarak maliyenin ortaya çıkışındaki Kıt'a Avrupa'sı ve Anglosakson gelenekler arasındaki farklılığı temel hareket noktası olarak ele alır. Ortaya çıkış sürecindeki bu farklılığın, günümüz maliye disiplini açısından belirleyici olduğunu ileri sürer. Çalışmada, Anglo-Sakson geleneğin bir devamı olarak, mali sorunu teknik bir düzeye indirgeyip toplumsal ve tarihsel bağlarından kopuk bir şekilde ele alan hâkim neo-klasik maliye yaklaşımı karşısında; Kıt'a Avrupa'sı geleneğinden beslenen mali sosyolojinin alternatif olma özelliği, ilk öncüler olarak ele alabileceğimiz Goldscheid, Schumpeter ve O'Connor'ın görüşleri çerçevesinde ele alınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERT, M. (2022). Fiscal sociology as an alternative approach to the public finance: Pioneers. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 81, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/499683

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. ANDIÇ, F., S. Andıç (1985/1999), "An Exploration into Fiscal Sociology: Ibn Khaldun, Schumpeter, and Public Choice", in The Legacy of Joseph A. Schumpeter Volume II, H. Hahush (eds.), Edward Elgar, USA: 1999, pp. 199-214.
  2. BACKHAUS, J. (2002), "Fiscal Sociology What For?", American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61 (1), January 2002, 55-77.
  3. BLOCK, F. (1981), "The Fiscal Crisis of the Capitalist State", Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 1981, 1-27.
  4. BELL, D. (1976), The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, Basic Books, New York, 1976.
  5. BOGGERI, M.L., J.W. Sundelson (1938), "Italian Theories of Fiscal Science", Political Science Quarterly, 53 (2), Jun, 1938, 249-267.
  6. CAMPHELL, J.L. (1993), "The State and Fiscal Sociology", Annual Review of Sociology 19, 1993, 163-185.
  7. GÜRKAN, C. (2011a), "Marx'in Ekonomi Politiğinde Devlet Borcu ve Vergiler", içinde Kriz ve Maliye Düşüncesinde Değişim: İzzettin Önder 'e Armağan, A., Pınar vd. (der), SAV Yayınları: İstanbul, 2011, ss. 215-249.
  8. GÜRKAN, C. (2011b), "Ekonomi Politik Olarak Kamu Maliyesi: Kavramsal ve Yöntembilimsel Bir İnceleme", Toplum ve Bilim 121, Temmuz 2011, 174-200.
  9. GOLDSCHEID, R. (1925/1964), "A Sociological Approach to Problems of Public Finance", in Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, R. Musgrave, A Peacock (eds), London St Martin Pres, 1964, pp. 202-13.
  10. HODGSON, G. M. (2001), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, Routledge: London and New York, 2001.
  11. İBN HALDUN (1990), Mukaddime, 2 Cilt, Çev. Z.K. Ugan, M.E.B. Yayınları, İstanbul: 1990-1991.
  12. MANN, F. K. (1943), "The Sociology of Taxation", The Review of Politics, 5 (2), 1943, 225-235.
  13. MUSGRAVE, R.A. (1959),
  14. The Theory of Public Finance, A Study in Public Economy, McGraw-Hill, New York, Toronto, London: 1959.
  15. MUSGRAVE, R. A. (1980), "Theories of Fiscal Crisis: An Essay in Fiscal Sociology", in H. Aaron, M. Boskin (eds.), The Economics of Taxation, The Brooking Institution, Washington: 1980, pp. 361-390.
  16. MUSGRAVE, R.A. (1992), "Schumpeter's Crisis of the Tax State: An Essay in Fiscal Sociology", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2, 89-113.
  17. MUSGRAVE, R., PEACOCK, A. (eds) (1964), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, London St Martin Pres, 1964.
  18. O'CONNOR, J. (1973),
  19. The Fiscal Crisis of The State, St. Nartin Pres, New York: 1973.
  20. PADGET, J. H. (1981), "Hierarchy and Ecological Control in Federal Budgetary Decision Making", The American Journal of Sociology, 87 (1), 1981, 75-129.
  21. SERT, M. (2010)