Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

ANALYSIS of LONG-and SHORT-RUN BALANCE of MONEY DEMAND in TURKEY USING ARDL and VEC APPROACHES

TÜRKİYE'DE PARA TALEBİNİN UZUN ve KISA DÖNEM DENGESİNİN ARDL ve VEC YAKLAŞIMLARI ile ANALİZ EDİLMESİ

Pages
19–32
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empiric results indicate that M2 is co-integrated with income, interest rate and exchangerate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study we use co-integration bound test-ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and VECM (vectorerror-correction model) approaches to test money demand function of Mundel ( 1963), including exchangerate, for Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the study is to find out short term stability level of M2, and examine if M2 is co- integrated with income, interest rate and exchange rate in long term.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Empiric results indicate that M2 is co-integrated with income, interest rate and exchangerate.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study we use co-integration bound test-ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and VECM (vectorerror-correction model) approaches to test money demand function of Mundel ( 1963), including exchangerate, for Turkey. The aim of the study is to find out short term stability level of M2, and examine if M2 is co- integrated with income, interest rate and exchange rate in long term. Our study covers yearly data between1970 and 20 10. Empiric results indicate that M2 is co-integrated with income, interest rate and exchangerate. In other words, linear combination of these variables converges to an equilibrium point in long- term.However, in short-term money demand function in Turkey has a significant and negative relationship withdeposit interest rates.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Mundellin (1963) döviz kurunu içeren para talebi fonksiyonu eş bütünleşme sınırtesti yaklaşımı-ARDL(autoregressive distributed lag) ve VECM (hata düzeltme modeli) yöntemlerikullanılarak Türkiye için test edilmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, geniş para talebinin (M2) kısa dönemistikrar düzeyini ortaya koymak ve uzun dönemde para talebinin milli gelir, faiz oranı ve döviz kuru ileeş-bütünleşik hareket edip etmediğini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışma 1970 ve 2010 arası dönemde yıllıkverileri kapsamaktadır. Elde edilen ampirik bulgulara göre, M2 uzun dönemde gelir, faiz ve döviz kuruile eş bütünleşik hareket etmektedir, yani uzun dönemde bu değişkenlerin doğrusal bileşimi bir dengenoktasına yakınsamaktadır. Ancak kısa dönemde para talebi fonksiyonu sadece mevduat faiz oranı ileanlamlı ve negatif ilişkili bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRU, B. (2022). ANALYSIS of LONG-and SHORT-RUN BALANCE of MONEY DEMAND in TURKEY USING ARDL and VEC APPROACHES. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 19–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/499645

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Adam, C. S. (1991) “Financial Innovation and the Demand for M3 in the UK 1975–1986” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53, 401–423. Alıcı, A. (2007) “Para Talebi – Para Politikasi İlişkisi: Türkiye için Eş-Bütünleme Analizi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1): 75-87.
  2. Altıntaş, H. (2008) “Türkiye’de Para Talebinin İstikrarı ve Sınır Testi Yaklaşımıyla Öngörülmesi: 1985-2006”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 15-46.
  3. Ansari, M.I. ve Ahmet, M.S. (2013) “ Does Money Matter? Evidence from Vector Error–Correction for Mexico”, The Journal of Developing Areas, 41(1), 185-202
  4. Akinlo, A.E. (2006) “The Stability of Money Demand in Nigeria: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Approach”, Journal of Policy Modeling 28, 445–452 Arango, S., ve Nadiri, M. I. (1981) “Demand for Money in Open Economies. Journal of Monetary Economics”, 7, 69–83. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (1996) “The Black Market Exchange Rate and the Demand for Money in Iran” Journal of Macroeconomics, 18, 171–176. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (2001) “How Stable is M2 Money Demand Function Stable in Japan?”, Japan and World Economy, 13(4), 455-461.
  5. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. ve Karacal, M. (2006), “The Demand for Money in Turkey and Currency Substitution”, Applied Economics Letters, 13(10), 635–642. Balaylar, N. A. ve Duygulu, A.A. (2004) “Türkiye’de Para İkamesi Olgusu ve Para Talebinin İstikrarı”, D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F.Dergisi, 19 (2), 33-54
  6. Dutkowsky, D. H. ve Atesoglu, H. S.(2001) “Demand for Money: A Structural Economic Investigation”, Southern Economic Journal, 68(1), 92-106.
  7. Gujarati, D. (1999) “Fundamentals of Econometrics”, John Wiley Hafer, R. W., ve Kutan, A. M. (1994) “Economic Reforms and the Long-Run Money Demand in China: Implications for Monetary Policy”, Southern Economic Journal, 60, 936–945. Hafer, R.W ve Jansen, D.W. (1991) “The Demand for Money in the United States: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 23(2), 155–168. Hoffman, D., ve Rasche, R. H. (1991) “Long-run Income and Interest Elasticities of Money Demand in the United States”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 665–674. Hsing, Y. (1989) “On the Variable Money Demand Elasticity: The Case of Taiwan”, International Economic Journal, 3(3), 43 – 52. Johansen, S. (1992) “Testing Weak Exogeneity and the Order of Cointegration in UK Money Demand Data”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 14, 313–334 Kara, O. (2011) “The Effects of The U.S. Budget Deficit and I