Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

CDS GETİRİLERİNİN APGARCH MODELLEMESİ

APGARCH MODELING OF CDS RETURNS

Pages
171–182
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this paper suggest that in the presence of asymmetric responses to innovations in the market, the APGARCH (1,1) Skewed Student-t model which accommodates both the skewness and the kurtosis of financial time series is preferred.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper considers the ability of the Generalized Asymmetric Power ARCH (APGARCH) model introduced by Ding, Granger and Engle (1993) to capture the stylized features of volatility in Credit Default Swap (CDS) returns for five countries (Brazil, Russia, China, South Africa and Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We analyze these countries daily CDS returns for the period January 27th, 2003November 4th, 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this paper suggest that in the presence of asymmetric responses to innovations in the market, the APGARCH (1,1) Skewed Student-t model which accommodates both the skewness and the kurtosis of financial time series is preferred.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper considers the ability of the Generalized Asymmetric Power ARCH (APGARCH) model introduced by Ding, Granger and Engle (1993) to capture the stylized features of volatility in Credit Default Swap (CDS) returns for five countries (Brazil, Russia, China, South Africa and Turkey). We analyze these countries daily CDS returns for the period January 27th, 2003November 4th, 2014. The results of this paper suggest that in the presence of asymmetric responses to innovations in the market, the APGARCH (1,1) Skewed Student-t model which accommodates both the skewness and the kurtosis of financial time series is preferred.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, beş ülkenin kredi temerrüt takası (CDS) getirilerinde (Brezilya, Rusya, Çin, Güney Afrika ve Türkiye) farklı hata dağılımlarına bağlı olarak oynaklık yapılarını belirlemek üzere Ding, Granger and Engle (1993) tarafından ileri sürülen Genelleştirilmiş Asimetrik Üslü ARCH (APGARCH) modelinin uygulanabilirliği araştırılmıştır. Söz konusu ülkelerin 27 Ocak 20034 Kasım 2014 dönemine ait günlük CDS getirileri analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları, piyasalarda yaşanan gelişmelere karşı asimetrik etkilerin varlığında, finansal zaman serilerindeki çarpıklık ve basıklık özelliklerini birlikte ele alan çarpık Student-t dağılımlı APGARCH(1,1) modelinin tercih edilmesi gerektiği yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

URAL, M., DEMİRELİ, E. (2022). CDS GETİRİLERİNİN APGARCH MODELLEMESİ. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 171–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/499641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bera, A.K. and Higgins, M.L. (1993). ARCH models: properties, estimation and testing, Journal of Economic Surveys, 4: 305-62.
  2. Black, F. (1976). Studies in stock price volatility changes, Proceedings of the 1976 Meeting of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, 177–81. Blanco, R., S. Brennan and I.W. Marsh (2005). An Empirical Analysis of the Dynamic Relationship Between Investment-Grade Bonds and Credit Default Swaps, Journal of Finance, 60(5). Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31: 307-27.
  3. Bollerslev, T. (1987). A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69: 542-47.
  4. Box, G.E.P and Cox D.R. (1964).
  5. An Analysis of Transformation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 26(2): 211-252.
  6. Brooks, R.D., Faff, R.W., McKenzie, M.D. and Mitchell, H. (2000). A multi-country study of power ARCH models and national stock market returns, Journal of International Money and Finance, 19: 377–97. Christie, A.A. (1982). The stochastic behaviour of common stock variances: value, leverage and interest rate effects, Journal of Financial Economics, 10: 407–32. Christoffersen, P., K. Jacobs, X. Jin and H. Langlois. (2013). Dynamic Dependence in Corporate Credit. Working Paper. Bauer College of Business. University of Houston. Conrad, J., R.F. Dittmar and A. Hameed. (2011). Cross-Market and Cross-Firm Effects in Implied Default Probabilities and Recovery Values. Working Paper. Kenan-Flagler Business School,.University of North Carolina. Creal, D.D., R.B. Gramercy and R.S. Tsay. (2014). Market-based Credit Ratings. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 32(3): 430-444.
  7. Creal, D.D., S.J. Koopman, and A. Lucas. (2013). Generalized Autoregressive Score Models with Applications. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 28(5): 777-795.
  8. Ding, Z., Granger, W.J. and Engle, R.F., (1993). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model, Journal of Empirical Finance, 1: 83-106.
  9. Engle, R. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation, Econometrica, 50(4): 987-1007.
  10. Giot, P. and Laurent, S. (2004). Modelling daily Value-at-Risk using realized volatility and ARCH type models, Journal of Empirical Finance, 11: 379-98.
  11. Glosten, G.L., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D.E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal ex