SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

MINT ÜLKELERİNDE ÇEVRESEL KUZNETS EĞRİSİ: UZUN DÖNEM PANEL NEDENSELLİK TESTİNDEN KANITLAR

ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE IN THE MINT COUNTRIES: EVIDENCE OF LONG-RUN PANEL CAUSALITY TEST

Ertuğrul YILDIRIM
Zafer ÖZTÜRK
Pages
175–184
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of this study supported the EKChypothesis only in the case of Nigeria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis (EKC) urges that there is an inverse-U-shapedrelationship between carbon dioxide emission per capita and income per capita.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The annual GDP per capita and carbon dioxide emissions percapita were obtained from the World Development Indicators 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of this study supported the EKChypothesis only in the case of Nigeria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis (EKC) urges that there is an inverse-U-shapedrelationship between carbon dioxide emission per capita and income per capita. Although there islots of paper attempting to test the EKC hypothesis, the reported empirical results and conclusions areambiguous. Departing from previous literature, this study focusses on two issues. Firstly, it examinesthe MINT countries which is neglected in the extend EKC literature. The MINT countries consist ofMexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey. The annual GDP per capita and carbon dioxide emissions percapita were obtained from the World Development Indicators 2013. The data set includes the periodof 1967-2010, due to the availability of data. Secondly, the long run panel causality test suggested byCanning and Pedroni (2008) is used the test EKC hypothesis. Results of this study supported the EKChypothesis only in the case of Nigeria.

Özet

Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi (ÇKE) kişi başına gelir ile karbondioksit emisyonu arasında ters U şeklinde bir ilişkininolduğunu öne sürmektedir. ÇKE hipotezini test etmek isteyen bir çok çalışma olmasına rağmen, ampirikbulgu ve sonuçlar belirsizdir. Bu çalışma iki nedenle önceki literatürden farklılaşmaktadır. İlk olarak buçalışma daha önceki ÇKE çalışmalarında bulunmayan MINT ülkeleri üzerine yapılmıştır. MINT ülkeleriMeksika, Endonezya, Nij erya ve Türkiyeden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada Dünya Bankası veri tabanı WDIın20 13 verilerinden elde edilen yıllık kişi başına GSYİH ve kişi başına karbondioksit emisyonu rakamlarıkullanılmıştır. Veriler 1967-20 10 dönemine aittir. İkinci olarak ÇKE hipotezini test etmek için Canning vePedroni (2008) tarafından önerilen uzun dönem panel nedensellik testi kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmanınsonuçları ÇKE hipotezini sadece Nij erya örneğinde desteklemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, E., ÖZTÜRK, Z. (2022). MINT ÜLKELERİNDE ÇEVRESEL KUZNETS EĞRİSİ: UZUN DÖNEM PANEL NEDENSELLİK TESTİNDEN KANITLAR. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 175–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/499639

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Akbostancı, E., Türüt-Aşık, S. ve Tunç, G.İ. (2009) “The Relationship Between Income and Environment in Turkey: Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Energy Policy, 37, 861–867. Ang, J. B. (2007) “CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Output in France”, Energy Policy, 35, 4772–4778. Apergis, N. ve Payne, J.E. (2009) “CO2 Emissions, Energy Usage, and Output in Central America”, Energy Policy, 37, 3282–3286. Apergis, N. ve Payne, J.E. (2010) “The Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Growth Nexus: Evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States”, Energy Policy, 38, 650–655. Brock, A.B. and Taylor, M.S. (2010) “The Green Solow Model”, Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 127–153. Chang, C. C. (2010) “A Multivariate Causality Test of Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in China”, Applied Energy, 87, 3533–3537. Canning, D. ve Pedroni, P. (2008) “Infrastructure, Long-Run Economic Growth and Causality Tests for Cointegrated Panels”, The Manchester School, 76 (5), 504–527. Carson, R.T. (2010) “The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4 (1), 3–23. Coondoo, D. ve Dinda, S. (2002) “Causality between Income and Emission: A Country-Group-Specific Econometric Analysis”, Ecological Economics, 40, 351– 367. Dinda, S. (2005) “A Theoretical Basis for the Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Ecological Economics, 53, 403–413. Dinda, S. ve Coondoo, D. (2006) “Income and Emission: A Panel-Data Based Cointegration Analysis”, Ecological Economics, 57, 167–181. Grossman, G. M. ve Krueger, A. B. (1991) “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No 3914. Halicioglu, F. (2009) “An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 37, 1156–1164. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M.H. ve Shin, Y. (2003) “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74. Kij ima, M., Nishide, K. and Ohyama, A. (2010) “Economic Models for the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 34, 1187–1201. Pedroni, P. (1999) “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653– 670. Pedroni, P. (2000) “Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels”, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 15