Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

ANALYSIS OF THE STATE LOTTERY AGENCY IN TERMS OF PUBLIC FUNDING: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL LOTTERY IN THE PRIVATIZATION PROCESS

KAMUSAL FİNANSMAN AÇISINDAN DEVLET PİYANGO KURUMLARININ ANALİZİ: ÖZELLEŞTİRME SÜRECİNDE MİLLİ PİYANGO İDARESİ'NİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
1–24
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study the political economy of the state lottery agency were examined and the privatization of National Lottery were analyzed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, there are two major discussions about lotteries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly to that, the lottery increases the government revenues, finances public expenditures and performs important social purposes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study the political economy of the state lottery agency were examined and the privatization of National Lottery were analyzed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today, there are two major discussions about lotteries. Accordingly to that, the lottery increases the government revenues, finances public expenditures and performs important social purposes. Or the lottery takes poor people s food money, deceives people and so it looks like an evil. From past to the present moral philosophers and thinkers have sought answer these questions, the states also has been operating in these sectors as the legal and institutioanal structure and have provided important public revenue. In this study the political economy of the state lottery agency were examined and the privatization of National Lottery were analyzed.

Özet

Günümüzde piyangolarla ilgili iki önemli tartışma bulunmaktadır. Buna göre piyango devlet gelirlerini artırmakta, kamusal harcamaları finanse etmekte ve önemli sosyal amaçlar gerçekleştirmektedir. Ya da birçok fakirin yiyecek parasını almakta, insanları kandırmakta ve böylece bir şeytana benzemektedir. Geçmişten günümüze ahlak filozofları ve düşünürler bu soruların cevaplarını aramışlar, devletler de yasal ve kurumsal olarak bu sektörde faaliyet göstermişler ve önemli kamusal gelirler sağlamışlardır. Bu çalışmada devlet piyango kurumlarının ekonomi-politiği incelenmiş ve Milli Piyango İdaresinin özelleştirme süreci analiz edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞUR, A. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE STATE LOTTERY AGENCY IN TERMS OF PUBLIC FUNDING: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL LOTTERY IN THE PRIVATIZATION PROCESS. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 1–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/499638

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ankara Haber, (2014), “Milli Piyango Özelleşti. İşte MPİ’nin Yeni Sahibi”, _____http://www.ankarahaber.com/ haber/Milli-Piyango-ozellesti-Iste-MPI-nin-yeni-sahibi/162743>, (15.08.2014).
  2. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., (2011), “Lottery Gambling: A Review”, Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol.27, No.1. Baykal, O. G. (2014), “Tayyare Piyangosu, _____http://www.airkule.com/yazar/TAYYARE-PIYANGOSU-2/895/> (15.08.2014).
  3. Elise, European Lotteries’ Report on Lotteries in the EU and in Europea, (2012), _____https://www. europeanlotteries.org/search/apachesolr_search/%22Key%20Data%20%E2%80%93%20All%20 Members%22>, (15.08.2014). Europe Economics, (2004), The Case for a Single European Gambling Market, Europe Economics Chancery House 53-64
  4. Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1QU. Garret, T. A. (2001), “The Leviathan Lottery? Testing the revenue Maximization Objective of State Lotteries as Evidence For Leviathan”, Public Choice, 109. Littler, A, Fijnaut, J. (2007), The Regulation of Gambling: European and National Perspectives, Boston: Martinus Njhoff Publishers. London Economics, (2013), “Lotteries in Europe”, EL Sustainable Gambling Conference, Sports Integrity in Europe and the Role of Lotteries, Brussel, 12 November, _____http://londoneconomics.co.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2013/11/European-Lotteries-Brussels-12-11-2013.pdf>, (15.08.2014).
  5. Maeda, A. (2008), “Optimal Lottery Design For Public Fınancing”, Economic Journal, Vol. 118. Martin, R, Yandle, B. (1990), “State Lotteries as Duopoly Transfer Mechanisms”, Public Choice, Vol. 64, No. 3. Matheson, V, Grote, K. (2008), “U.S. Lotto Markets”, Handbook of Sports And Lottery Markets, Editors: Donald B. Hausch, William T. Ziemba, North Holland, Elsevier B.V. McGowan, R. (1994), State Lotteries and Legalized Gambling: Painless Revenue or Painful Mirage, London: Greenwood Publishing Group. Mikesell, J. L, Zorn, C. K. (1986), “State Lotteries as Fiscal Savior or Fiscal Fraud: A Look at the Evidence”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 46, No. 4. Miyazaki, A. D, Hansen, A ve Sprott, D. E. (1998), “A Longitudinal Analysis of Income-Based Tax Regressivity of State-Sponsored Lotteries”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 2. Milli Piyango İdaresi, (2007), 2007
  6. Yılı Faaliyet Raporu, Ankara. Milli Piyango İdaresi, (2008), 2008
  7. Yılı Faaliyet Raporu, Ankara. Milli Piyango İdaresi, (2012), 2012
  8. Yılı Faaliyet Raporu, Ankara. Milli Piyango İdaresi, (2013), 2013
  9. Yılı Faaliyet Raporu, Ankara.
  10. Nelson, M, Mason, L. C. (2007), How The South Joine