Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

PERCEPTION ON RECYCLING SYSTEMS, IT'S FINANCING AND ACCOUNTING: THE CASE OF kAHRAMANMARAş SüTçü iMAM UNIvERSITY

GERİ DÖNÜŞÜM SİSTEMLERİNE YÖNELİK ALGI DÜZEYİ, FİNANSMANI VE MUHASEBELEŞTİRİLMESİ: KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTçÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
73–93
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicate that recycling rate at the university campus is quite low.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to investigate the perception of the members of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University towards recycling, examine financing options in trigerring the use of recycling systems and explain the accounting process of recycling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings indicate that recycling rate at the university campus is quite low.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides these factors, it is also found that current financing and accounting practises are also hampering the improvement of the recycling in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the perception of the members of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University towards recycling, examine financing options in trigerring the use of recycling systems and explain the accounting process of recycling. Findings indicate that recycling rate at the university campus is quite low. The findings also show that unknown recycling points and the difficulty of delivering waste to recycling points are the majör obstacles towards recycling. Besides these factors, it is also found that current financing and accounting practises are also hampering the improvement of the recycling in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi'nde bireylerin geri dönüşüme yönelik algı düzeylerini ortaya koymak, söz konusu sistemlerin ülkemizdeki uygulamalarının artırılmasında kullanılabilecek finansman yöntemleri hakkında bilgi aktarmak ve geri dönüşümün muhasebeleştirmesi sürecini açıklamaktır. Çalışma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, üniversitedeki geri dönüşüm oranlarının çok düşük seviyelerde kaldığına işaret etmektedir. Geri dönüşüm noktalarının nerelerde olduğunun bilinmemesi ve atıkları geri dönüşüm noktalarına ulaştırmanın zor gelmesi gibi unsurların geri dönüşümün önündeki engellerin başında geldiği görülmektedir. Elde edilen bulgular söz konusu fiziksel faktörlerin yanı sıra, mevcut finansman ve muhasebe uygulamalarının da geri dönüşümün gelişimine engel teşkil ettiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, S., HATUNOĞLU, Z. (2022). PERCEPTION ON RECYCLING SYSTEMS, IT'S FINANCING AND ACCOUNTING: THE CASE OF kAHRAMANMARAş SüTçü iMAM UNIvERSITY. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 73–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/499601

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Apaydın, Ö. & Gönüllü, M.T. (2011, Kasım). Recyclable solid waste characterization and recycling studies for the campuses of a university. Eurasia waste management syposium. Haliç Kongre ve Kültür Merkezi, İstanbul.
  2. Amerikan Çevre Koruma Ajansı. (2014). Retrieved 12.07.2014 from, http://epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/industrial/ index.htm. Avrupa Çevre Ajansı. (2014). Retrieved 12.07.2014 from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/managingmunicipal-solidwaste/turkey-municipal-waste-management.
  3. Berger, I.E. (1997). Demographics of recycling. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 515-531.
  4. Butler, J. & Hooper, P. (2000). Factors determining the post-consumer waste recycling burden. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(3), 407-432.
  5. Costa, R.C.B. (2011). Community recycling awareness and participation at massey universities turitea campus. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Massey Universitesi, Yeni Zellanda. Dahle, M. & Neumayer, E. (2001). Overcoming barriers to campus greening a survey among higher educational institutions in london, UK. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2(2), 139-160.
  6. Eken, E. (2013). Ulusal geri dönüşüm stratejisi ve eylem planı 2013-2016. Kalkınmada Anahtar Verimlilik, 294. Retrieved 12.07.2014 from https://anahtar.sanayi.gov.tr/tr/news/ulusal-geri-donusum-stratejisi-veeylem plani-2013-2016/493) Ekere, W, Mugisha J. & Drake, L. (2009). Factors influencing waste separation and utilization among households in the lake victoria crescent Uganda. Waste Management, 29(12), 3047-3051. Elfithri,R., Ghee,T.K., Basri, N.E.A. & Zain, S.N. (2012). Integrated paper recycling management system in UKM campus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 556-561.
  7. Kaplowitz, M.D., Yeboah, F.K., Thorp, L. & Wilson, A.M. (2009). Garnering input for recycling communication strategies at a big ten university. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 612-623.
  8. Katzev, R. & Mishima, H.R. (1992). The use of posted feedback to promote recycling. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 259-264.
  9. Kelly, T.C., Mason, I.G., Leiss, M.W. & Ganesh, S. (2006). University community responses to on-campus resource recycling. Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 47, 42-55.
  10. Laustsen, G. (2007). Reduce-recycle-reuse: guidelines for promoting perioperative waste management. AORN Journal, 85(4), 717-722.
  11. Malakahmad, A., Nasir, M.Z.Z., Kutty, S.R.M. & Isa, M.H. (2010). Solid waste characterization and recycling potential for university technology petronas academic building