Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND UNEMPLOYMENT NEXUS IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’DE ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ vE İŞSİZLİK İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
21–31
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Gregory-Hansen cointegration test results show that there is a cointegration relationship between the variables in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the relationship between energy consumption and unemployment in Turkey over the period from 1980 to 2015 by utilizing the Gregory-Hansen cointegration test and Toda-Yamamoto causality test.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to Toda-Yamamoto causality test results, there is unidirectional causality relationship between variables from energy consumption to unemployment rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Gregory-Hansen cointegration test results show that there is a cointegration relationship between the variables in the long run.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between energy consumption and unemployment in Turkey over the period from 1980 to 2015 by utilizing the Gregory-Hansen cointegration test and Toda-Yamamoto causality test. The Gregory-Hansen cointegration test results show that there is a cointegration relationship between the variables in the long run. According to Toda-Yamamoto causality test results, there is unidirectional causality relationship between variables from energy consumption to unemployment rates. Therefore, it is concluded that changes in energy consumption affects unemployment rates. It should be taken into consideration that energy consumption has effect on unemployment rates by policy makers

Özet

Bu çalışmada Gregory-Hansen eşbütünleşme testi ve Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi kullanılarak 19802015 döneminde Türkiye için enerji tüketimi ile işsizlik arasındaki ilişki araştırılmıştır. Gregory-Hansen eşbütünleşme testi sonuçlarına göre değişkenler arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir. Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre ise enerji tüketiminden işsizlik oranlarına doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisinin varlığı belirlenmiştir. Böylece, enerji tüketimindeki değişikliklerin işsizlik oranları üzerinde etkili olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Politika yapıcılar tarafından enerji tüketiminin işsizlik oranları üzerinde etkili olduğu dikkate alınmalıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

BEŞEL, F. (2022). ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND UNEMPLOYMENT NEXUS IN TURKEY. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 21–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/499592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahmad, F. (2013). The Effect of Oil Prices on Unemployment: Evidence from Pakistan, Business and Economics Research Journal, 4(1), 43-57.
  2. Akçacı, T. (2013). Eğitim Harcamalarının İktisadi Büyümeye Etkisi (The Influence of Education Expenditure on Economic Growth), Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(5): 65-79. Bouchaour C., & Al-Zeaud H. A. (2012). Oil Price Distortion and Their Impact on Algerian Macroeconomic, International Journal of Business and Management, 7(18). Caporale, G. M., & Gil-Alana, L. A. (2002). Unemployment and Input Prices: A Fractional Cointegration Approach, Applied Economics Letters, 9(6), 347-351.
  3. Carruth, A. A., Hooker, M. A., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). Unemployment Equilibria and Input Prices Theory And Evidence From The United States, The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS), 496. Chang, Y., & Wong, J. F. (2003). Oil Price Fluctuations and Singapore Economy, Energy Policy, 31(1), 1151-1165.
  4. Chang, Y., Jha, K., Fernandez, K. M., & Jam’an, N. F. (2011). Oil Price Fluctuations and Macroeconomic Performance In Asian and Oceanic Economies, http://www.usaee.org/usaee2011/submissions/ OnlineProceedings/Chang%20et%20al_Full%20Paper.pdf, (28.08.2015).
  5. Çatık, A. N. (2006). Yapısal Kırılma Altında Para Talebinin İstikrarı: Türkiye Örneği (Money Demand Stability under The Stuctural Break: The Turkish Case), Ege Üniversitesi,
  6. Working Paper, No:06/11. Dadkhah, K. M., & Stijns, J. C. (2006). The Effects Of Political Instability In The Middle East and OPEC Production Policy On Oil Prices, http://www.luc.edu/orgs/meea/volume8/PDFS/Dadkhah.pdf, (28.08.2015).
  7. Doğrul, H. G., & Soytas, U. (2010).
  8. Relationship Between Oil Prices, Interest Rate, and Unemployment: Evidence From An Emerging Market, Energy Economics, 32(6), 1523-1528.
  9. Erkan, B., Şentürk, M., Akbaş, Y. E., & Bayat, T. (2011). The Effect on the Indicators of Unemployment of International Crude Oil Price Volatility: Empirical Findings on the Case of Turkey, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2): 715-730. Estrada A., & Cos, P. H. D. (2012). Oil Prices and Their Effect On Potential Output, Applied Economics Letters, 19(3), 207-214.
  10. Ewing, B. T., & Thompson, M. A. (2007). Dynamic Cyclical Comovements Of Oil Prices With Industrial Production,Consumer Prices, Unemployment, and Stock Prices, Energy Policy, 35(11), 5535-5540.
  11. Gil-Alana, L. A., (2003). Unemployment and Real Oil Prices In Australia: A Fractionally Cointegrated Approach, Applied E