It was found that some indexes reflected adequately environmental changes while others not.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper reports the results of an annual hydrochemical and hydrobiological survey carried out in the littorals of the Kuibyshev reservoir (Republic of Tatarstan, Russia). 26 hydrochemical and 16 hydrobiological assessment parameters were taken into consideration during the evaluation of the composition of the sampled water.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In general, 100 samples were analyzed quantitatively while 43 samples were assessed qualitatively (23 from the first region and 20 from the second one).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that some indexes reflected adequately environmental changes while others not.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:100 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
This paper reports the results of an annual hydrochemical and hydrobiological survey carried out in the littorals of the Kuibyshev reservoir (Republic of Tatarstan, Russia). 26 hydrochemical and 16 hydrobiological assessment parameters were taken into consideration during the evaluation of the composition of the sampled water. In general, 100 samples were analyzed quantitatively while 43 samples were assessed qualitatively (23 from the first region and 20 from the second one). It was found that some indexes reflected adequately environmental changes while others not. Therefore, we concentrated on here what markers may be considered as the most appropriate during analysis of the water quality.
🔖
Cite This Article
RATUSHNYAK, A. A., BORISOVICH, M. G., IVANOV, D. V., ANDREEVA, M. G. E., TRUSHIN, M. V., VALEEV, V. S. (2022). The hydrochemical and hydrobiological analysis of the condition of the Kuibyshev reservoir littorals (Republic of Tatarstan, Russia). Ekoloji, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 61, 22–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/499292
Aleksin OA (1970) Fundamentals of hydrochemistry. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad. 2.Andronikova IN (1996) Structural and functional organization of the zooplankton lake ecosystems of various trophic types. Nauka, St. Petersburg. 3.Anonymous (1982) Methodic recommendations on collection and processing of hydrobiological samples from freshwater basins. Nauka, Leningrad. 4.Anonymous (2003) State control of the water quality. A manual. Standard Press, Moscow. 5.Bacry E, Delour J, Muzy JF (2001) A multifractal random walk. Physical. Reviews 26, 103-106. 6.Balushkina EV, Vinberg GG (1979) Dependence between length and body mass in crustaceans. In: Experimental and campestral investigations of biological fundamentals of the lake productivity. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 58-72. 7.Borisovich LV, Borisovich MG (2000) Realization aspects of the zooplankton data bank and toolkit in SMBD ACCESS medium. New Knowledge, Kazan. 8.Cohn F (1853) Über lebendige Organismen im Trinkwasser. Zurnal of Klinikal Medizin 4, 229-237. 9.De Pauw N, Vanhooren G (1983) Method for biological quality assessment of water courses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia 100, 153-168. 10.Feodorov VD, Kondrin EK, Levich AP (1977) Rank distribution of the phytoplankton number of the White Sea. Doklady Biological Science 236, 264-267. 11.Frontier S (1987) Applications of fractal theory to ecology. In: Legendre P, Legendre L (eds), Developments in numerical ecology, Springer, Berlin, 33-44. 12.Gilyarov AM (1970) Structural features of the freshwater crustacean plankters. PhD Thesis, Moscow State University, Moscow. 13.Hanazato T, Yasuno M (1990) Influence of persistence period of an insecticide on recovery patterns of a zooplankton community in experimental ponds. Environmental Pollution 67, 109-122. 14.Havens KE, Hanazato T (1993) Zooplankton community responses to chemical stressors: A comparison of results from acidification and pesticide contamination research. Environmental Pollution 82, 277-288. 15.Iudin DI, Gelashvili DB, Rozenberg GS (2003) Multifractal analysis of the species structure of biotic communities. Doklady Biological Science 389, 143-146. 16.Krylov AV (1996) Zooplankton of the small rivers under influence of the distinct anthropogenic load. PhD Thesis, Institute of the Inland Waters Biology, Borok. 17.Krylov AV (2003) Zooplankton of the champaign small rivers in changing conditions of nature. DSc Thesis, Institute of Nature Management of RAS, Moscow. 18.Kutikova LA (1998) Remarks on the rotifer