Journals / Ekoloji / 2007 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 64

Landsat görüntüleri kullanarak Uluabat sulak alanında değişimin yönünü ölçme

Quantifying the change detection of the Uluabat Wetland, Turkey, by use of landsat images

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
9–20
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall change, that the lake experiences, is toward drying up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract The objectives of this study were to determine land use and land cover (1), measure changes in the shoreline since 1975 (2), define hazard areas attributed to land cover change (3), and describe local landscape pattern characteristics (4) in the Uluabat Wetlands.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analyses were carried out using remotely sensed data from the Landsat MSS 1975, Landsat TM 1987 and Landsat ETM+ 2000 multi-spectral sensor systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall change, that the lake experiences, is toward drying up.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract The objectives of this study were to determine land use and land cover (1), measure changes in the shoreline since 1975 (2), define hazard areas attributed to land cover change (3), and describe local landscape pattern characteristics (4) in the Uluabat Wetlands. Analyses were carried out using remotely sensed data from the Landsat MSS 1975, Landsat TM 1987 and Landsat ETM+ 2000 multi-spectral sensor systems. In brief, it has been determined that surface water had decreased by almost seventeen percent from 1975 to 2000. Analyses show an increase in fragmentation of the landscape. The overall change, that the lake experiences, is toward drying up.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Uluabat sulak alanında arazi kullanımı ve arazi değişimini belirlemek; 1975 ten beri meydana gelen kıyı değişimini ortaya koymak; arazi örtüsü değişimine bağlı olarak ortaya çıkan risk alanlarını tespit etmek ve yerel peyzaj patern karakteristiklerini tanımlamak amaçlanmıştır. Analizler Landsat MSS 1975, Landsat TM 1987 ve Landsat ETM+ 2000 çok bantlı sensor sitemleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Özet olarak, 1975 ten 2000 yılına kadar su yüzeylerinin yaklaşık yüzde onyedi oranında azaldığı belirlenmiştir. Analizler peyzaj parçalılığında artışın olduğunu göstermektedir. Genel anlamıyla göldeki değişim kuruma yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAĞIL, Ş. (2022). Landsat görüntüleri kullanarak Uluabat sulak alanında değişimin yönünü ölçme. Ekoloji, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 64, 9–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/499256

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acreman MC, Hollis GE (1996) Water Management and Wetlands in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Gland
  2. Altinsacli S, Griffiths HW (2001) Ostracods (Crustaces) from the Turkish RAMSAR site of Lake Kuş (Manya Gölü). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 11, 217-225
  3. Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper: 964, United States Government Printing Office, Washington
  4. Andren H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71, 355-366
  5. Anonymous (1995) European Commission, Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on wise use and conservation of wetlands, COM (95) 189 final, Brussels
  6. Anonymous (1996) RAMSAR Convention, Strategic plan 1997-2002. RAMSAR Convention Bureau, Gland
  7. Ari Y (2002) Visions of a Wetland: Linking Culture and Conservation at Lake Manyas, Turkey. UMI, An Arbor, Publication Number: AAT 3025135. ISBN: 0-493-38335-2, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  8. Benessaiah N (1988) Mediterranean Wetlands Socioeconomic Aspects. RAMSAR Convention Bureau, Gland
  9. Crews-Meyer KA (2002) Characterizing landscape dynamism via paneled-pattern metrics. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68, 1031-1040. 10.Crews-Meyer KA (2004) Agricultural landscape change and stability in northeast Thailand: historical patch-level analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 101, 155-169. 11.Dappen P, Merchant J (2003) Delineation of 2001 Land Use Patterns for the Cooperative Hydrology Study in the Central Platte River Basin. Center for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Nebraska Hall, Lincoln. 12.De Voogt K, Kite G, Droogers P, Murray-Rust H (2000) Modeling water allocation between a wetland and irrigated agriculture in the Gediz Basin, Turkey. Water Resources Development 16, 639-650. 13.Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York. 14.Green AJ, Fox AD, Hilton G, Hughes B, Yarar M, Salathe T (1996) Threats to Burdur Lake ecosystem, Turkey and its water birds, particularly the White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala. Biological Conservation 76, 241-252. 15.Hudson W, Ramm C (1987) Correct formulation of the kappa coefficient of agree