Journals / Ekoloji / 2009 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 70

Farklı sualtı makrofit gruplarında epifitik meiofaunalar

Epiphytic meiofauna in stands of different submerged macrophytes

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Insect larvae, mostly Chironomidae, and Oligochaeta juveniles were the most abundant taxa recorded during the entire investigated period in all stands of macrophytes, except in P. amphibium.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Epiphytic meiofauna in association with pure stands of four macrophytes (Nymphoides peltata, Ceratophyllum demersum, Polygonum amphibium and Carex spp.) were studied in the slow-flowing Conakut Channel, within the Kopacki rit floodplain, Croatia, during two vegetation seasons (2001 and 2002).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The meiofauna densities for different macrophyte types showed a significant variation between N. peltata and C. demersum stands with a total of 15 meiofauna taxa on the macrophytes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Insect larvae, mostly Chironomidae, and Oligochaeta juveniles were the most abundant taxa recorded during the entire investigated period in all stands of macrophytes, except in P. amphibium.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Epiphytic meiofauna in association with pure stands of four macrophytes (Nymphoides peltata, Ceratophyllum demersum, Polygonum amphibium and Carex spp.) were studied in the slow-flowing Conakut Channel, within the Kopacki rit floodplain, Croatia, during two vegetation seasons (2001 and 2002). The meiofauna densities for different macrophyte types showed a significant variation between N. peltata and C. demersum stands with a total of 15 meiofauna taxa on the macrophytes. Insect larvae, mostly Chironomidae, and Oligochaeta juveniles were the most abundant taxa recorded during the entire investigated period in all stands of macrophytes, except in P. amphibium.

Özet

Hırvatistan'ın Kopacki sel havzasında bulunan, yavaş akışlı Conakut kanalında, epifitik meiofauna ile ilişkili dört saf makrofit nesli (Nymphoides peltata, Ceratophyllum demersum, Polygonum amphibium and Carex spp.), iki yıl süreyle (2001 ve 2002) çalışıldı. Farklı makrofit tiplerinin meiofauna yoðunlukları, makrofitler üzerinde toplam 15 tür olmak üzere, N. peltata ve C. demersum nesilleri arasında önemli varyasyonlar gösterdi. Böcek larvaları, çoðunlukla Chironomidae ve Oligochaeta yavruları; P. amphibium hariç bütün makrofit nesillerinde, araştırma süresinin tamamında kaydedilen en yaygın taxa idi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOGUT, I., VIDAKOVIC, J., CERBA, D., PALIJAN, G. (2022). Farklı sualtı makrofit gruplarında epifitik meiofaunalar. Ekoloji, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 70, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/499166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anonymous (1985) Standard methods for thr Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington Bogut I and Vidakovic J (2002) Differences in submerged and emergent eulittoral sediment biota of Lake Sakadaš (Nature Park Kopacki rit, Croatia). Natur. Croat. 11, 2, 157-170.
  2. Carlson RE and Simpson J (1996) A Coordinator's Guide to Volunteer Lake Monitoring Methods. North American Lake Management Society, Madison. Carpenter SR and Lodge DM (1986) Effect of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat. Bot. 26, 341-370.
  3. Cattaneo A, Galanti G, Gentinetta S and Romo S (1998) Epiphytic algae and macroinvertebrates on submerged and floating-leaved macrophytes in an Italian lake. Freshwater Biol. 39, 725-740.
  4. Cheruvelil KS, Soranno PA, Madsen JD and Robertson MJ (2002) Plant architecture and epiphytic macroinvertebrate communities: the role of an exotic dissected macrophyte. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 21, 2, 261-277.
  5. Clarke KR and Gorley RN (2001) Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth. Deák C, Kiss MK and Lakatos G (2005) Periphyton examinations on the Tisza-tó. Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 13, 63-71.
  6. Duplisea DE (2000) Benthic organisms biomass size-spectra in the Baltic Sea in relation to the sediment environment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 3, 558-568. Dvorák J and Imhof G (1998) The role of animals and animal communities in wetlands. In: Westlake DF, Kvet J and Szczepanski A (eds), The production ecology of wetlands: the IBP synthesis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 211-318.
  7. Giere O (1993) Meiobenthology: The microscopic fauna in aquatic sediments. Springer Verlag, Berlin. Gopal B and Goel U (1993) Competition and allelopathy in aquatic plant communities. Bot. Rev. 59, 155-210.
  8. Gregg WW and Rose FL (1985) Influences of aquatic macrophytes on invertebrate community structure, guild structure, and microdistribution in streams. Hydrobiologia 128, 45-56. Gross EM (199) Allelopathy in benthic and littoral areas: Case studies on allelochemicals from benthic cyanobacteria and submersed macrophytes. In: Inderjit KM, Dakshini M and Foy CL (eds), Principles and Practices in Plant Ecology: Allelochemical Interactions, CRC Press,
  9. LLC, Boca Raton, 179-199.
  10. Hann BJ (1995) Invertebrate associations with submersed aquatic plants in a praire wetland. UFS (Delta Marsh) Annual Report 30, 78-84. Khalifé M, Gwyther J and Aberton J (2005) Land use, water quality and ecological responses in Lake Colac - trends from Australia. Management of Environmental Quality 16, 4