Journals / Ekoloji / 2010 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 76

Türkiye'nin Kuzeybatısındaki (Yalova) Pinus pinea ormanlarının ekolojik özellikleri

Ecological features of the Pinus pinea forests in the north-west region of Turkey (Yalova)

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
95–101
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Association and its higher units are as follows: Class: Quercetea ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Order: Quercetalia ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Alliance: Quercion ilicis Br.-Bl.(1931) 1936 Association: Lavandulo cariensis-Pinetum pineae ass. nova

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the phytosociological structure and ecological features of the Pinus pinea forests in the Fıstıklı village of Yalova province in the north-west region of Turkey was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From the phytogeographical point of view, it is situated in the Europe-Siberian floristic region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Association and its higher units are as follows: Class: Quercetea ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Order: Quercetalia ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Alliance: Quercion ilicis Br.-Bl.(1931) 1936 Association: Lavandulo cariensis-Pinetum pineae ass. nova
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the phytosociological structure and ecological features of the Pinus pinea forests in the Fıstıklı village of Yalova province in the north-west region of Turkey was investigated. From the phytogeographical point of view, it is situated in the Europe-Siberian floristic region. The vegetation of the study area was analyzed according to the Braun-Blanquet approach, and the plant associations were classified by considering the characteristic species. In this study, we will describe one plant association belonging to the forest vegetation types. Association and its higher units are as follows: Class: Quercetea ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Order: Quercetalia ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Alliance: Quercion ilicis Br.-Bl.(1931) 1936 Association: Lavandulo cariensis-Pinetum pineae ass. nova

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye'nin kuzeybatısındaki Yalova ilinin Fıstıklı köyünde bulunan Pinus pinea ormanlarının fitososyolojik yapısı ve ekolojik özellikleri araştırıldı. Fitocoğrafik görüş açısından alan Avrupa-Sibirya floristik bölgesinde bulunmaktadır. Çalışma alanının vejetasyonu Braun-Blanquet yaklaşımına göre analiz edildi ve bitki birlikleri karakter türlere göre sınıflandı. Sonuçta, çalışma alanından orman vejetasyon tipine ait bir bitki birliği tanımlandı. Birlik ve bağlı olduğu üst kategoriler aşagıdaki gibidir: Class: Quercetea ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Order: Quercetalia ilicis Br.-Bl. 1947 Alliance: Quercion ilicis Br.-Bl. (1931) 1936 Association: Lavandulo cariensis-Pinetum pineae ass. nova

🔖

Cite This Article

TEL, A. Z., VAROL, O. (2022). Türkiye'nin Kuzeybatısındaki (Yalova) Pinus pinea ormanlarının ekolojik özellikleri. Ekoloji, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 76, 95–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/499149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Akgül ME, Yılmaz A (1991) Türkiye'de Fıstık Çamının Ekolojik Özellikleri. Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü, Bülten No. 215, Ankara.
  2. Akman Y (1973) Aperçu Preliminaire Surles Conditions Phyto-Ecologiques De La Chaine de L'Amanos Dans la Region Du Hatay. Communications C1, 17, 75-98.
  3. Akman Y (1995) Türkiye Orman Vejetasyonu. Palme Yayınevi,
  4. Ankara.
  5. Akman Y, Barbero M, Quezel P (1978) Contribution a'l'etude de la végétation forestiere d'Anatolie méditerranéenne. Phytocoenologia 5, 1, 1-79.
  6. Akman Y, Barbero M, Quezel P (1979) Contribution a'l'etude de la végétation forestiére d'Anatolie méditerranéenne. Phytocoenologia 5, 2, 189-276.
  7. Anonymous (2005) Ortalama, ekstrem sıcaklık ve yağış değerleri Bülteni. Devlet Meteorolji işleri Genel Müdürlüðü, Ankara.
  8. Barbero M, Quezel P (1981) Les forés t de Méditerranée orientale dans une perspective d'écologie appliquée a la sylviculture méditerranéenne. Acta Ecologia 2, 3, 227-239.
  9. Barkman JJ, Doing H, Segal S (1964) Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur quantitativen Vegetationsanalyse. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 13, 394-419.
  10. Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd edition, Springer Verlag, Wien-New York. Davis PH (ed.) (1965-1985) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 1-9,
  11. Edinburgh University Press,
  12. Edinburgh. Davis PH, Mill RR, Tan K (eds.) (1988) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement). Vol. 10, Edinburgh University Press,
  13. Edinburgh. Dierschke H (1994) Pflanzensoziologie. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stutgart. Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Baþer KHC (2000) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement II). Vol. 11, Edinbutg University Press, Edinburgh. Hamzaoðlu E, Aksoy A (2009) Phytosociological Studies on the Halophytic Communities of Central Anatolia. Ekoloji 71, 1-14.
  14. Mirov NT (1967) The genus Pinus. The Ronald Press Company, New-York. Sorensen T (1948) A method of establishing groups of egual amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content. Biologiske Skrifler, Kongelike Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 5, 4, 1-34.
  15. Quezel P (1973) Contribution a l'etude Phytosociologique du Massif du Taurus. Phytocoenologia 1, 2, 131-222.
  16. Quezel P, Barbero M, Akman Y(1978) L'Interpretation Phytosociologique des Groupments Forestiers dans le Bassın Méditérranéen oriantal. Documents Phytosociologiques 2, 329-352.
  17. Quezel P, Barbero M, Akman Y (1992) Typification de syntaxa décrits en région mediterranéenne orientale. Ecologia Mediterranea 18, 81