Journals / Ekoloji / 2011 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 80

Farklı yatak malzemeli yapay sulak alanlar ile karasudan fenol giderimi

Removal of phenol from olive mill wastewater in constructed wetlands using different bedding media

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the phenol removal values of the systems in the planted and unplanted reactors were obtained as 89.65% ± 2.61 and 83.21%± 5.10 for CW1 respectively, they were 74.55% ± 14.17 and 73.44 % ± 19.07 for CW2 respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the removal of phenol from olive mill wastewater in the planted/unplanted constructed wetlands containing filling material at different percentages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two constructed wetland systems were developed with two CW1 reactors (containing 100% zeolite) and two CW2 reactors (containing 30% zeolite, 49% gravel and 21% sand) on a laboratory scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the phenol removal values of the systems in the planted and unplanted reactors were obtained as 89.65% ± 2.61 and 83.21%± 5.10 for CW1 respectively, they were 74.55% ± 14.17 and 73.44 % ± 19.07 for CW2 respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the removal of phenol from olive mill wastewater in the planted/unplanted constructed wetlands containing filling material at different percentages. Two constructed wetland systems were developed with two CW1 reactors (containing 100% zeolite) and two CW2 reactors (containing 30% zeolite, 49% gravel and 21% sand) on a laboratory scale. Cyperus alternatifolius was used as the plant for both systems. The HRT (Hydraulic Retention Time) was determined as 2.8 days in system CW1 while it was 3 days in system CW2. The mean phenol concentration for the 89 days was 22.89 mg/l. While the phenol removal values of the systems in the planted and unplanted reactors were obtained as 89.65% ± 2.61 and 83.21%± 5.10 for CW1 respectively, they were 74.55% ± 14.17 and 73.44 % ± 19.07 for CW2 respectively.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, hacimce farklı yüzdelerde dolgu meteryaline sahip, bitkili/bitkisiz yapay sulakalanlarda karasudan fenol gideriminin incelenmesidir. Bu amaçla, laboratuvar ölçekli iki adet CW1 reaktörü (%100 zeolitli) ve iki adet de CW2 reaktörü (%30 zeolit-%49 çakıl-%21 kum) yapay sulak alan sistemi olarak geliştirilmiştir. Bitki olarak her bir sistemde Cyperus alternatifolius kullanılmıştır. CW1 sisteminde HRT (Hidrolik Alıkonulma Süresi) 2,8 gün iken, CW2 sisteminde 3 gün olarak belirlenmiştir. 89 günlük işletim süresince, ortalama fenol konsantrasyonu 22,89 mg/L dir. Sistemlerin bitkili ve bitkisiz reaktörlerinde fenol giderimi sırasıyla CW1 için %89,65 ± 2,61, %83,21± 5,10 iken CW2 için sırasıyla %74,55 ± 14,17 ve %73,44 ± 19,07 olarak elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALCUK, A. (2022). Farklı yatak malzemeli yapay sulak alanlar ile karasudan fenol giderimi. Ekoloji, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 80, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/499099

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Achak M, Mandi L, Ouazzani N (2009) Removal of organic pollutants and nutrients from olive mill waste water by a sand filter. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 2771-2779.
  2. Anonymous (2003) Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document for Constructed Wetlands. The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council Wetlands Team Online Reports. Online at: www.afcee.brooks.af.mil/products/techtrans/download/WTLND-1.pdf Anonymous (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Waste and Wastewater (20th Ed.). APHA, AWWA, Washington. Bubba MD, Checckini L, Pifferi C, Zanieri L, Lepri L (2004) Olive mill wastewater treatment by a pilot scale subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland. Annali di Chimica 94 (12): 875-887.
  3. Ghiaci M, Abbaspur A, Kia R, Seyedeyn-Azad F (2004) Equilibrium isotherm studies for the sorption of benzene, toluene and phenol onto organo-zeolites and as-synthesized MCM-41. Separation Purification Technology 40: 217-229
  4. Khalid M, Joly G, Renaud A, Magnoux P (2004) Removal of phenol from water by adsorption using zeolites. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 43: 5275-5280.
  5. Kuleyin A (2007) Removal of phenol and 4-chlorophenol by surfactant-modified natural zeolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials 144: 307-315.
  6. Polprasert C, Dan NP, Thayalakumura N (1996) Application of constructed wetlands to treat some toxic wastewater under tropical conditions. Water Science and Technology 34: 165-171.
  7. Stasikanis A, Elia I, Petalas A, Halvadakis J (2008) Removal of total phenols from olive mill wastewater using an agricultural by products, olive pomace. Journal of Hazardous Materials 160: 408-413.
  8. Tee HC, Seng CE, Noor Md A, Lim PE (2009) Performance Comparison of Constructed Wetland with gravel and rice husk-based media for phenol and nitrogen removal. Science of the Total Environment 407: 3563-3571.
  9. Uysal Y, Taner F (2007) The Effect of Cadmium Ions on the Growth Rate of the Freshwater Macrophyte Duckweed Lemna minor. Ekoloji 16 (62): 9-15.
  10. Yesilada O, Sık S, Sam M (1999) Treatment of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater with Fungi. Turkish Journal of Biology 23, 231-240.