Journals / Ekoloji / 2013 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 87

Fuzzy logic evaluation of water quality classification for heavy metal pollution in Karasu Stream, Turkey

Karasu Nehri (Türkiye) ağır metal kirliliği için su kalite sınıflandırılmasının bulanık mantık ile değerlendirilmesi

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
43–50
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it was supposed that fuzzy logic evaluation method may also be used as an alternative tool for decision-making in environmental management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traditional water quality evaluation methods use discrete form that involve upper and lower limits, and the concentrations values are equally important when the values are near to or far away from the limits.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For that purpose, a data set (12 months, total 180 measurements) about several heavy metals such as Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd) and Iron (Fe) was collected from 5 monitoring stations in Karasu River.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it was supposed that fuzzy logic evaluation method may also be used as an alternative tool for decision-making in environmental management.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Traditional water quality evaluation methods use discrete form that involve upper and lower limits, and the concentrations values are equally important when the values are near to or far away from the limits. Moreover, each quality parameter might belong to one of the four classes; therefore differences of the classes of the parameters may be vagueness. In this study, an index model is purposed for quality evaluation of water quality classification using fuzzy logic. For that purpose, a data set (12 months, total 180 measurements) about several heavy metals such as Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd) and Iron (Fe) was collected from 5 monitoring stations in Karasu River. After that, fuzzy logic assessment method was used to quality evaluation for heavy metal pollution in Karasu stream. In conclusion, it was supposed that fuzzy logic evaluation method may also be used as an alternative tool for decision-making in environmental management.

Özet

Geleneksel su kalite değerlendirme metotlarında; alt ve üst limitleri içeren ayırım tabloları kullanılmaktadır. Gözlenen konsantrasyon değerleri, ayırım tablolarında aynı bölge içerisinde yer alıyorsa; değerler limitlere yakın yada uzak olsun aynı eşit öneme sahiptir. Ayrıca her bir kalite parametresi, tabloda yer alan dört sınıftan birisi içerisinde yer almalıdır. Bu nedenle, her bir parametrenin farklı sınıflarda olduğu durumlarda da belirsizlik meydana gelir. Bu çalışmada, su kalite sınıflandırılmasının bulanık mantık ile değerlendirilmesinin yapıldığı bir indeks model kullanılmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda; Karasu Nehrinde 5 istasyonda, 12 ay boyunca, toplam 180 adet ölçümü yapılarak; Bakır (Cu), Çinko (Zn), Manganez (Mn), Kurşun (Pb), Nikel (Ni), Kadmiyum (Cd) ve Demir (Fe) gibi bazı ağır metal konsantrasyonlarının veri kümesi oluşturulmuştur. Ardından Karasu Nehrindeki ağır metal kirliliği için bulanık mantık değerlendirme metodu kullanılmıştır. Sonuçta; çevre yönetiminde karar oluşturmak için bulanık mantık değerlendirme metodunun alternatif bir araç olabileceği düşünülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

SONMEZ, A. Y., HASILOGLU, S., MEHAN, H. N. A., KAYA, H., HISAR, O. (2022). Fuzzy logic evaluation of water quality classification for heavy metal pollution in Karasu Stream, Turkey. Ekoloji, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 87, 43–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/499007

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbulut M, Kaya H, Celik Es, Odabasi DA, Odabasi SS, Selvi K (2010) Assessment of surface water quality in the Atikhisar Reservoir and Sarıçay Creek (Çanakkale, Turkey). Ekoloji 19(74):139-149.
  2. Alam MGM, Tanaka A, Stagnitti F, Allinson G ve Maekawa T (2001) Observations on the effects of caged carp culture on water and sediment metal concentrations in lake Kasumigaura Japan. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 48:107-115.
  3. Anonymous (2006) Packaged software for technical computing, Release 14, The Math Works, Inc. Chen RY, Hua M, Xu AG (2008) Several methods of water environment quality assesment in the Yangtze River. Journal of East Chine Institute of Technology 31: 146-151.
  4. Ocampo-Duque W, Huguet NF, Domingo JL, Schumacher M (2006) Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: A case study. Environment International 32: 733-742.
  5. Huang F, Wang X, Lou L, Zhou Z, Wu J (2010) Spatial variation and source apportionment of water pollution in Qiantang River (China) using statistical techniques. Water Research 44: 1562-1572.
  6. Icaga Y (2007) Fuzzy evaluation of water quality classification. Ecological Indicators 7: 710-718.
  7. Jain CK, Gupta Harish, Chakrapani G J (2008) Enrichment and fractionation of heavy metals in bed sediments of River Narmada, India. Environmental Monitoring and assessment 141: 35-47.
  8. Li H, Chen CLP, Huang HP (2001) Fuzzy neural intelligent systems: mathematical foundation and the applications in engineering. CRC Press,
  9. USA. Li QZ, He JS (2007) Discussion on compherensive assessment of water quality. Yellow River 29: 50-52.
  10. Liou SM, Lo SL, Hu CY (2003) Application of two-stage fuzzy set theory to river quality evaluation in Taiwan Source. Water Research 37: 1406–1416. Liou YT, Lo SL (2005) A fuzzy index model for trophic status evaluation of reservoir waters. Water Research 39: 1415–1423. Liu X, Li G, Liu Z, Guo W, Gao N (2010) Water pollution characteristics and assessment of lower reaches in Haihe River Basin. Procedia 2: 199-206.
  11. Liu L, Zhou JZ, An XL, Zhang YC, Yang L (2009) Using fuzzy theory and information entropy for water quality assessment. Expert Systems with Applications 37:2517-2521.
  12. Ludwig B, Tulbur, I (1996) Contributions to an aggregated environmental pollution index. In: Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 11-16 August 1996, Washington DC, 4: 2144- 2149. Ocampo-Duque W, Ferré-Huguet N, Domingo JL, Schuhmacher M (2006) Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inferenc