Journals / Ekoloji / 2014 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 91

Imazamox'un İki Farklı Nem Koşulları Altında Toprak Karbon ve Azot Mineralizasyonuna Etkisi

Effects of Imazamox on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization under Two Different Humidity Conditions

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
22–28
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mineralization ratios (%) of carbon in all herbicide doses ofP humidified at 60% and 80% FC were significantly higher than all the other dose-humidity combinationsof NE soils (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Imazamox, is a herbicide intensively used in the peanut field soils of Osmaniye, Turkey with Mediterraneanclimate conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The recommended field dose [(RFD), 40 gL-1active ingredient], 2 × RFD, and 4 × RFD of this herbicide were added to the NE and P soil.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mineralization ratios (%) of carbon in all herbicide doses ofP humidified at 60% and 80% FC were significantly higher than all the other dose-humidity combinationsof NE soils (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Imazamox, is a herbicide intensively used in the peanut field soils of Osmaniye, Turkey with Mediterraneanclimate conditions. In this study, two types of soils were selected, first not exposed (NE) to Imazamoxpreviously and the second Imazamox treated peanut soil (P). The recommended field dose [(RFD), 40 gL-1active ingredient], 2 × RFD, and 4 × RFD of this herbicide were added to the NE and P soil. Themicrobial activities of the soils were measured by carbon and nitrogen mineralization under two differenthumidity conditions [60% and 80% of field capacity (FC)]. Carbon mineralization was determined by theCO2respiration method at 30°C over 45 days. Mineralization ratios (%) of carbon in all herbicide doses ofP humidified at 60% and 80% FC were significantly higher than all the other dose-humidity combinationsof NE soils (P

Özet

Imazamox, Türkiye'nin Akdeniz ikliminin etkisi altındaki Osmaniye yerfıstığı tarla topraklarında oldukçayaygın bir biçimde kullanılan bir herbisittir. Bu çalışmada, iki tip toprak seçilmiş olup, birincisi dahaönceden imazamoxla muamele edilmemiş olan toprak ve ikincisi de imazamox ile muamele edilmiş fıstıktoprağıdır. Bu herbisitin önerilen tarla dozu (40 g L-1etken madde) ve bu dozun 2 ve 4 katı dozları, öncedenimazamoxla muamele edilmiş ve edilmemiş topraklara ilave edilmiştir. Toprakların mikrobiyal aktivitesifarklı nem koşulları altında (tarla kapasitesinin %60 ve %80'i oranında) karbon ve azot mineralizasyonuylaölçülmüştür. Karbon mineralizasyonu 45 gün boyunca 30°C'de CO2respirasyon yöntemiyle ölçümüştür.Tarla kapasitesinin %60'ı ve %80'i ile nemlendirilmiş ve imazamoxun tüm dozlarıyla muamele edilmiş fıstıktoprağındaki karbon mineralizasyon oranları, herbisitle muamele edilmemiş toprakların diğer bütün doznem kombinasyonlarından daha anlamlı bulunmuştur (P

🔖

Cite This Article

CENKSEVEN, S., KOCAK, B., KIZILDAG, N., DARICI, C., SAGLIKER, H. A., DAGLIOGLU, N., BOZDOGAN, N. Y. (2022). Imazamox'un İki Farklı Nem Koşulları Altında Toprak Karbon ve Azot Mineralizasyonuna Etkisi. Ekoloji, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 91, 22–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/498964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aka Sagliker H (2009) Effects to soil carbon mineralization of the different doses of trifluralin at the different temperature conditions. European Journal of Soil Biology 45: 473-477.
  2. Alexander M (1981) Biodegradation of chemicals of environmental concern. Science 211: 132-138.
  3. Allison LE, Moodie CD (1965) Carbonate. American Society of Agronomy 9: 1379-1396.
  4. Anonymous (1978) Mikrobiyologisches handbuch. E. Merck, Darmstad. Anonymous (2011) Turkish republic ministry of agriculture and rural welfare, crop protection division, registered agrochemicals in Turkey. Turkish Republic Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Welfare Press,
  5. Ankara.
  6. Anonymous (2012) Ortalama ve ekstrem kıymetler. Meteoroloji Müdürlüğü Yayını, Ankara.
  7. Atlas MR (2005) Handbook of media for environmental microbiology. Taylor and Francis, New York. Basham GW, Lavy TL (1987) Microbial and phorolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Science 35: 865-870.
  8. Benlot C (1977) Recherches sur les activites biochimiques dans les successions de sols derives de cendres volcaniques sous climat tropical humide (Zaire- Indonesie), ENS Lab De Zoologie, Paris. Bouyoucos GS (1951) A recalibration of the hydrometer for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal 43: 434-438.
  9. Cobucci T, Prates HT, Falcao CLM (1998) Effect of imazamox, fomesafen, and acifluorfen soil residue on rotational crops. Weed Science 46: 258-263.
  10. Dalias P, Anderson JM, Bottner P, Coûteaux MM (2001) Temperature responses of carbon mineralization in conifer forest soils from different regional climates incubated under Standard laboratory conditions. Global Change Biology 6: 181-192.
  11. Debnath A, Das AC, Mukherjee D (2002) Rhizosphere effect of herbicides on nitrogen fixing bacteria in relation to availability of nitrogen in rice soil. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 50: 463-466.
  12. Demiralay I (1993) Toprak fiziksel analizleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları,
  13. Erzurum. Duchaufour P (1970) Precis de pedologie. Masson et C1e, Paris. Eser F, Aka Sağlıker H, Darıcı C (2007) The effects of glyphosate isopropylamine and trifluralin on the carbon mineralization of olive tree soils. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 31: 297-302.
  14. Gökçeoğlu M (1979) Bazı bitki organlarındaki azot, fosfor ve potasyumun bir vejetasyon periyodundaki değişimi. Doğa Tarım ve Ormancılık 3: 192-199.
  15. Hassink J (1994) Effects of soil texture on the size of the microbial biomass and on the amount of C mineralized per unit of microbia