Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2005 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of icefeel and cryocuff applications in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains

Lateral ayak bileği yaralanmalarında icefeel ve cryocuff uygulamalarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
205–214
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Invertors were found to be stronger at speeds of 30°/sec and 60°/sec and evertors at speeds of 60°/sec and 120°/sec in the Icefeel group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: We compared the effectiveness of Icefeel® cold bandage and Cryocuff® applications in the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains.Patients and methods: The study included 78 patients with a grade I-II lateral ankle sprain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were randomly assigned to applications of Icefeel (n=38) and Cryocuff (n=40) groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Invertors were found to be stronger at speeds of 30°/sec and 60°/sec and evertors at speeds of 60°/sec and 120°/sec in the Icefeel group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: We compared the effectiveness of Icefeel® cold bandage and Cryocuff® applications in the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains.Patients and methods: The study included 78 patients with a grade I-II lateral ankle sprain. The patients were randomly assigned to applications of Icefeel (n=38) and Cryocuff (n=40) groups. Evaluations were made in the first, fourth, 14th, and 28th days with regard to pain (visual analog scale), edema (volumetrically), range of motion (goniometry), and functional status (Kitaoka Functional Ankle Scale). In addition, in the 28th day, inversion-eversion isokinetic muscle strengths were calculated on an isokinetic testing machine (Biodex System 3 Pro) and talar tilts on inversion stress radiographs. Statistical evaluations were made by 2x4 repeated measures analysis of variance.Results: In the course of time, decreases in pain and edema levels, increases in range of motion in all directions, and improvements in functional status were observed in both groups (p0.05). Invertors were found to be stronger at speeds of 30°/sec and 60°/sec and evertors at speeds of 60°/sec and 120°/sec in the Icefeel group (p

Özet

Amaç: Akut lateral ayak bileği yaralanmalarının tedavisinde Icefeel® soğuk bandaj ve Cryocuff® uygulamalarının tedavideki etkinlikleri karşılaştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Çalışmaya evre I-II lateral ayak bileği yaralanması tanısı konmuş 78 hasta alındı. Hastalar rasgele yöntemle Icefeel (n=38) ve Cryocuff (n=40) gruplarına ayrıldı. Hastalar birinci, dördüncü, 14. ve 28. günlerde ağrı (görsel analog skala), ödem (volümetrik yöntem), eklem hareket açıklığı (gonyometrik ölçüm) ve fonksiyonel durum (Kitaoka Fonksiyonel Ayak Bileği Skalası) açısından değerlendirildi. Yirmi sekizinci günde eversiyon-inversiyon yönünde izokinetik kas kuvveti Biodex System 3 Pro cihazı ile, talar tilt inversiyon stress radyografisi ile değerlendirildi. İstatistik inceleme 2x4 tekrar ölçümlü varyans analiziyle gerçekleştirildi.Bulgular: Her iki grupta da zamana bağlı olarak hastaların ağrı ve ödem düzeylerinde azalma, eklem hareket açıklığında tüm yönlerde artma ve fonksiyonel düzeyde iyileşme görüldü (p0.05). Icefeel grubunda 30°/sn ve 60°/sn hızlarda invertörler, 60°/sn ve 120°/sn hızlarda ise evertörler Cryocuff grubundan kuvvetli bulundu (p0.05).Sonuç: Ayak bileği burkulması tedavisinde Icefeel ve Cryocuff uygulamaları benzer etkinlik göstermektedir; ancak, Icefeel uygulaması daha erken mobilizasyona izin vermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKUSUZ, F., AKIN, S., ÖZBERK, Z. N., COŞKUN, Ö. Ö., IŞIKLI, S. (2022). Comparison of icefeel and cryocuff applications in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 205–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/498878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Richie DH Jr. Functional instability of the ankle and the role of neuromuscular control: a comprehensive review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2001;40:240-51
  2. Hintermann B. Biomechanics of the unstable ankle joint and clinical implications. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31(7 Suppl):S459-69
  3. Pijnenburg AC, Van Dijk CN, Bossuyt PM, Marti RK. Treatment of ruptures of the lateral ankle ligaments: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82:761-73
  4. Zoch C, Fialka-Moser V, Quittan M. Rehabilitation of ligamentous ankle injuries: a review of recent studies. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:291-5
  5. Wolfe MW, Uhl TL, Mattacola CG, McCluskey LC. Management of ankle sprains. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:93-104
  6. Kannus P, Renstrom P. Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991;73:305-12
  7. Watts BL, Armstrong B. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of double Tubigrip in grade 1 and 2 (mild to moderate) ankle sprains. Emerg Med J 2001;18:46-50
  8. Boyce SH, Quigley MA, Campbell S. Management of ankle sprains: a randomised controlled trial of the treatment of inversion injuries using an elastic support bandage or an Aircast ankle brace. Br J Sports Med 2005;39:91-6
  9. Bleakley C, McDonough S, MacAuley D. The use of ice in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:251-61
  10. Sloan JP, Hain R, Pownall R. Clinical benefits of early cold therapy in accident and emergency following ankle sprain. Arch Emerg Med 1989;6:1-6
  11. Rubin A, Sallis R. Evaluation and diagnosis of ankle injuries. Am Fam Physician 1996;54:1609-18
  12. Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, ter Riet G. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ 2003;326:417
  13. Kerkhoffs GM, Struijs PA, de Wit C, Rahlfs VW, Zwipp H, van Dijk CN. A double blind, randomised, parallel group study on the efficacy and safety of treating acute lateral ankle sprain with oral hydrolytic enzymes. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:431-5
  14. Moholkar K, Fenelon G. Normal volume of the foot and ankle. The Foot 2001;11:63-5
  15. Youdas JW, Bogard CL, Suman VJ. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of ankle joint active range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1113-8
  16. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myers