Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2005 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Lomber stenoz veya dejeneratif spondilolistesis tedavisi için interspinöz ligamentoplastide modifiye yeni bir teknik

A modified technique of interspinous ligamentoplasty for lumbar stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis

Pages
146–152
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Yet, it should be justified with long-term comparative studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Interspinous ligamentoplasty (ILP) was first introduced by Senegas for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Twenty patients (4 men, 16 women; mean age 61.3 years; range 31 to 83 years) underwent ILP after posterior decompression.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Yet, it should be justified with long-term comparative studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Interspinous ligamentoplasty (ILP) was first introduced by Senegas for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. The purpose of this study was to present a modified technique of ILP for lumbar stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis. Patients and methods: Twenty patients (4 men, 16 women; mean age 61.3 years; range 31 to 83 years) underwent ILP after posterior decompression. Ten patients had stenosis with instability, eight patients had degenerative spondylolisthesis, and two patients had a juxtafacet cyst. The authors modified the original Senegas ILP procedure, so called the figure of '8' technique, as the '80 to 88' technique. In this modification, a second circular artificial ligament is added turning around the upper and lower spinous processes, initially resembling the figure 0. It is then fastened in the middle so that its appearance turns to the figure 8. Hence, the ligamentoplasty procedure is composed of two artificial ligaments both resembling the figure '8". Results: At the end of a mean follow-up period of 17.4 months (range 1 to 45 months), the mean Ostwestry Disability Index score improved from 66% (range 26% to 88%) preoperatively to 31.1% (range 4% to 56%). Two patients developed superficial wound infection and another two developed transient dysesthesia. None of the patients required reoperation. Conclusion: Considering relatively short operation time, less invasiveness, and its nonfusion nature, ILP with '80 to 88' technique seems to be an appropriate option for dynamic stabilization in treating degenerative pathologies. Yet, it should be justified with long-term comparative studies.

Özet

Amaç: İnterspinöz ligamentoplasti (İLP) dejeneratif lomber hastalığın tedavisi için ilk kez Senegas tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, lomber stenoz veya dejeneratif spondilolistesis tedavisinde kullandığımız modifiye İLP tekniğinin sunulması amaçlandı. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Yirmi hastaya (4 erkek, 16 kadın; ort. yaş 61.3; dağılım 31-83) posterior dekompresyondan sonra İLP uygulandı. On hastada instabilitenin eşlik ettiği stenoz, sekiz hastada dejeneratif spondilolistesis, iki hastada da jukstafaset kisti vardı. Senegas'ın '8' rakamı olarak bilinen İLP prosedürü, yazarlar tarafından "80'den 88'e" tekniği şeklinde modifiye edildi. Bu modifikasyonda, üst ve alt spinöz prosesler ikinci bir yapay ligamanla '0' rakamına benzer şekilde çevrilir. Bu yapay ligaman daha sonra ortasından bağlanarak, '8' rakamına dönüştürülür. Sonuçta ligamentoplasti prosedüründe her ikisi de '8' rakamına benzeyen iki yapay ligaman kullanılmış olur. Bulgular: Ameliyattan önce ortalama %66 (dağılım (%26-88) olan Ostwestry Sakatlık İndeksi skoru, ortalama 17.4 ay (dağılım 1-45 ay) olan izlem döneminin sonunda %31.1'e (dağılım %4-56) geriledi. Komplikasyon olarak iki hastada yüzeyel yara enfeksiyonu, iki hastada geçici disestezi görüldü. Hiçbir hastada yeniden ameliyat gerekmedi. Sonuç: Oldukça kısa ameliyat süresi, daha az invaziv ol¬ması ve nonfüzyon özelliği göz önüne alındığında, "80'den 88'e" İLP tekniği, dejeneratif patolojilerin tedavisinde dinamik stabilizasyon için uygun bir seçenek olarak görünmektedir. Bununla birlikte, uzun dönemli karşılaştırmalı çalışmalarla sınanması gerekir.

🔖

Cite This Article

LEE, S., SHIN, S., LEE, H., CHANG, S. B. (2022). Lomber stenoz veya dejeneratif spondilolistesis tedavisi için interspinöz ligamentoplastide modifiye yeni bir teknik. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 146–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/498871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Javid MJ, Hadar EJ. Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 1998;89:1-7
  2. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 1992;17:1-8
  3. Ganz JC. Lumbar spinal stenosis: postoperative results in terms of preoperative posture-related pain. J Neurosurg 1990;72:71-4
  4. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, Duranceau J, Oxland T, Crisco JJ. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 1990;15:1142-7
  5. Boden SD, Martin C, Rudolph R, Kirkpatrick IS, Moeini SM, Hutton WC. Increase of motion between lumbar vertebrae after excision of the capsule and cartilage of the facets. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76:1847-53
  6. Frymoyer JW, Selby DK. Segmental instability. Rationale for treatment. Spine 1985;10:280-6
  7. Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1986;11:107-10
  8. Jonsson B, Alesson M, Jonsson K, Stromqvist B. Low risk for vertebral slipping after decompression with facet joint preserving technique for lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 1992;1:100-4
  9. Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 1995;8:464-73
  10. Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H. Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 2001;10:309-13
  11. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, Weinstein JN, Reinarz SJ, el-Khoury GY, et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine 1987;12:97-104
  12. Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:392-400
  13. Senegas J, Etchevers JP, Vital JM, Baulny D, Grenier F. Widening of the lumbar vertebral canal as an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. [Article in French] Fr J Orthop Surg 1998;2:93-9
  14. Mayer HM, List J, Korge A, Wiechert K. Microsurgery of acquired degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Bilateral over-the-top decompression through unilateral approach. [Article in German] Orthopade 2003;32:889-95
  15. Epstein NE. Lumbar laminectomy for the resection of synovial cysts and coexisting lumbar spinal ste