Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Minimally invasive arthroplasty

Minimal invaziv artroplasti

Pages
158–160
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, until we have convincing scientific data in terms of greater safety and efficacy with this technique, it should not be used only for the sake of marketing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Interest in minimally invasive arthroplasty of the hip and knee joints has increased recently.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Application of this technique via a smaller incision or multiple smaller incisions, and some advantages such as less pain, quicker recovery, and shorter hospital stay may appeal to our senses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, until we have convincing scientific data in terms of greater safety and efficacy with this technique, it should not be used only for the sake of marketing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Interest in minimally invasive arthroplasty of the hip and knee joints has increased recently. Application of this technique via a smaller incision or multiple smaller incisions, and some advantages such as less pain, quicker recovery, and shorter hospital stay may appeal to our senses. However, there is considerable data that, in the short-term, minimally invasive arthroplasty does not overcome many serious early and late complications that occur with standard arthroplasty and that it is associated with worsening problems in the hip and knee. Therefore, until we have convincing scientific data in terms of greater safety and efficacy with this technique, it should not be used only for the sake of marketing.

Özet

Son yıllarda, kalça ve diz eklemlerinde minimal invaziv artroplasti uygulamalarına ilgi artmıştır. Küçük kesi veya kesilerin kullanılması, hastaların daha az ağrı duyması, daha kısa zamanda iyileşme ve hastanede daha kısa süre kalma bu yöntemin çekici yanları gibi görünmektedir. Standart kesi veya yaklaşımla yapılan artroplastilerden sonra bile erken veya geç dönemde komplikasyonlarla karşılaşılmaktadır. Minimal invaziv artroplastinin bu sorunlara kısa vadede çözüm getirmediğini, kalçada ve dizde bu sorunların arttığını gösteren yayınlar vardır. Etkili ve güvenli olduğuna ilişkin bilimsel verilerle desteklenene kadar bu yöntem pazarlama aracı olarak kullanılmamalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, B. Y., ATİK, O. (2022). Minimally invasive arthroplasty. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 158–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/498832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ciminiello M, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Eslampour A, Rothman RH. Total hip arthroplasty: is small incision better? J Arthroplasty 2006;21:484-8
  2. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS. Minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty: where are we going? J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85:2070-1
  3. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;(392):315-8
  4. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404):7-13
  5. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87:2432-8. 6. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, Winemaker MJ. Single- incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:945-50
  6. Fehring TK, Mason JB. Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. A series of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87:711-4
  7. Kim WY, Shafi M, Kim YY, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han CW. Posteromedial compartment cement extrusion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopy: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14:46-9
  8. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O'Brien S, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87:701-10
  9. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (441):86-90
  10. Whiteside LA. Mini incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(4 Suppl 1):16-8
  11. Atik OŞ. Unikompartmental diz protezi uygulamaları- mız. Artroplasti Artroskopi 1990;2:10-11
  12. Atik OŞ, Doral MN. Kinematik kondiler diz protezi- Erken sonuçlar. MİD Ort Trav Reh Der 1988;3;164-6
  13. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;(428):68-73
  14. Laskin RS. Mini-incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary in opposition. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(4 Suppl 1):19-21
  15. Laskin RS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (44