Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2009 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Is there any difference in joint position sense among different knee angles?

Dizin farklı açılarında eklem pozisyon hissi farklı mıdır?

Pages
47–51
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No significant difference was observed between 15-90 and 30-60 degrees of knee flexion.Conclusion: It has been demonstrated that the measurements of knee joint position sense differ in different positions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyse the knee joint position sense in different knee angles and to compare the results.Patients and methods: Forty healthy volunteers (20 females, 20 males; mean age 21.1±0.7; range 19 to 23 years) participated this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The joint position sense was analyzed at 15, 30, 60 and 90 degrees of knee flexion using the motion analysis system designed by us.Results: The highest error was observed at 60 degrees of knee flexion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No significant difference was observed between 15-90 and 30-60 degrees of knee flexion.Conclusion: It has been demonstrated that the measurements of knee joint position sense differ in different positions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyse the knee joint position sense in different knee angles and to compare the results.Patients and methods: Forty healthy volunteers (20 females, 20 males; mean age 21.1±0.7; range 19 to 23 years) participated this study. The joint position sense was analyzed at 15, 30, 60 and 90 degrees of knee flexion using the motion analysis system designed by us.Results: The highest error was observed at 60 degrees of knee flexion. Statistically significant differences were found between 15-30, 15-60, 30-90 and 60-90 degrees of knee flexion. No significant difference was observed between 15-90 and 30-60 degrees of knee flexion.Conclusion: It has been demonstrated that the measurements of knee joint position sense differ in different positions.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada dizin farklı eklem açılarındaki eklem pozisyon hissi değerlendirildi ve sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Çalışmaya 40 sağlıklı gönüllü (20 kadın, 20 erkek; ort. yaş 21.1±0.7; dağılım 19-23) katıldı. Eklem pozisyon hissi, diz 15, 30, 60 ve 90 derecelik fleksiyon pozisyonlarında iken, geliştirmiş olduğumuz hareket analiz sistemi kullanılarak değerlendirildi.Bulgular: En yüksek hata açısı değeri, diz 60 derecelik fleksiyon pozisyonunda olduğu sırada görüldü. 15-30, 15-60, 30-90 ve 60-90 derecelik diz fleksiyon açıları arasında anlamlı farklar bulundu. 15-90 ve 30-60 derecelik diz fleksiyon açıları arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Çıkarımlar: Eklem pozisyon hissinin, dizin farklı eklem açılarındaki ölçümlerde değişiklikler gösterdiği ortaya kondu.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEN, Z. (2022). Is there any difference in joint position sense among different knee angles?. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 47–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/498743

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Barrack RL, Lund PJ, Skinner HB. Knee joint proprioception revisited. J Sport Rehabil 1994;3:18-42 2. Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraldo JL, Fu FH. The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:130-7. 3. Glencross D, Thornton E. Position sense following joint injury. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1981;21:23-7. 4. Lankhorst GJ, van de Stadt RJ, van der Korst JK, Hinlopen-Bonrath E, Griffioen FM, de Boer W. Relationship of isometric knee extension torque and functional variables in osteoarthrosis of the knee. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982;14:7-10. 5. Sharma L. Proprioceptive impairment in knee osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1999;25:299-314. 6. Irrgang JJ, Whitney SL, Cox ED. Balance and proprioceptive training for rehabilitation of the lower extremity. J Sport Rehab 1994;3:68-83. 7. Sharma L, Pai YC, Holtkamp K, Rymer WZ. Is knee joint proprioception worse in the arthritic knee versus the unaffected knee in unilateral knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1518-25. 8. Alpaslan AM. Total diz protezinde yumuşak doku dengesi ve rekonstrüksiyonu. XIII. Milli Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongre Kitabı, 15-19 Mayıs, 1993,
  2. Nevşehir, Turkey: Ankara: T.H.K. Basımevi; 1993. p. 109-19. 9. Heck DA, Murray DG. Biomechanics of the knee. In: Evarts MC, editor. Surgery of the musculoskeletal system. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1990. p. 3243-51. 10. Erden Z, Otman S, Atilla B, Tunay VB. Relationship between pain intensity and knee joint position sense in patients with severe osteoarthritis. The Pain Clinic 2003;15:293-7. 11. Bennell K, Wee E, Crossley K, Stillman B, Hodges P. Effects of experimentally-induced anterior knee pain on knee joint position sense in healthy individuals. J Orthop Res 2005;23:46-53 12. Amankwah K, Triolo R, Kirsch R, Audu M. A modelbased study of passive joint properties on muscle effort during static stance. J Biomech 2006;39:2253-63. 13. Hurd WJ, Chmielewski TL, Axe MJ, Davis I, Snyder- Mackler L. Differences in normal and perturbed walking kinematics between male and female athletes. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004;19:465-72. 14. Ghaffarinejad F, Taghizadeh S, Mohammadi F. Effect of static stretching of muscles surrounding the knee on knee joint position sense. Br J Sports Med 2007;41:684-7. 15. Ageberg E, Flenhagen J, Ljung J. Test-retest reliability of knee kinesthesia in healthy adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:57. 16. Fatoye FA, Palmer ST, Macmillan F