Mecbio kalça yüzey yenileme protezinin yeni versiyonunun değerlendirilmesi

Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this preliminary study was to compare clinical outcomes of the modern version of the Mecbio resurfacing arthroplasty prosthesis which is custom-designed for each patient with the older prototype which has three sizes.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Between 2003 and 2008, 20 patients with hip disorders who underwent a total of 21 arthroplasties with the modern version or prototype prosthesis were included in the study.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Results: There was a significant improvement in the Harris Hip Score following surgery compared to baseline between the groups (p

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2003 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this preliminary study was to compare clinical outcomes of the modern version of the Mecbio resurfacing arthroplasty prosthesis which is custom-designed for each patient with the older prototype which has three sizes. Patients and methods: Between 2003 and 2008, 20 patients with hip disorders who underwent a total of 21 arthroplasties with the modern version or prototype prosthesis were included in the study. The prototype was used for the first 15 procedures, while the modern version was used for the last six procedures. The modified lateral approach was performed on all patients. Clinical and radiological examination were also performed by two experienced surgeons. Cortical changes of the calcar were evaluated by comparison of the thinner layer of the medial cortex with thickened one within 5 cm below the lesser trochanter. The patients were also clinically evaluated by the Harris Hip Score. The mean follow-up was three years (range, 2 to 5 years). Results: There was a significant improvement in the Harris Hip Score following surgery compared to baseline between the groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu öncül çalışmanın amacı, Mecbio yüzey yenileme artroplasti protezinin her hastaya özel tasarlanmış yeni versiyonu ve üç ebatta mevcut olan eski prototipin klinik sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktır. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Çalışmaya 2003 ve 2008 yılları arasında kalça bozukluğu olan ve modern versiyon ve prototip protez ile toplam 21 artroplasti yapılan 20 hasta dahil edildi. İlk yapılan 15 işlemde prototip kullanılırken, son altı işlemde modern versiyon kullanıldı. Tüm hastalara modifiye edilmiş lateral yaklaşım uygulandı. İki deneyimli cerrah tarafından klinik ve radyolojik değerlendirme yapıldı. Kalkarda görülen kortikal değişiklikler, medial korteksin ince tabakasının küçük trokanterin 5 cm aşağısındaki kalın tabakayla karşılaştırılması ile değerlendirildi. Ayrıca hastalar Harris Kalça Skoru ile de değerlendirildi. Ortalama takip, üç yıldı (dağılım 2-5 yıl). Bulgular: Her iki grubun cerrahi sonrası Harris Kalça Skorunda başlangıca kıyasla anlamlı bir iyileşme vardı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

WANG, S., ZHANG, Y., SHIH, G. L. (2022). Mecbio kalça yüzey yenileme protezinin yeni versiyonunun değerlendirilmesi. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 2–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/498667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

Huber M, Reinisch G, Trettenhahn G, Zweymüller K, Lintner F. Presence of corrosion products and hypersensitivityassociated reactions in periprosthetic tissue after aseptic loosening of total hip replacements with metal bearing surfaces. Acta Biomater 2009;5:172-80
Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87:324-9
Ünver B, Karatosun V, Günal İ. Rehabilitation of thrust plate prosthesis which is a new approach of the femoral component of total hip arthroplasty. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2001;12:186-93
SFDA (Sino Food & Drug Administration); Approval No. 3050191. 2003
Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1982;64:17-9
Ranawat CS, Atkinson RE, Salvati EA, Wilson PD Jr. Conventional total hip arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease in patients between the ages of forty and sixty years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984;66:745-52
Chen CJ, Xenos JS, McAuley JP, Young A, Engh CA Sr. Second-generation porous-coated cementless total hip arthroplasties have high survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;451:121-7
Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip using alumina ceramic and crosslinked polyethylene. A 17-year follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87:1220-1
Mont MA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Delanois RE. Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90 Suppl 3:45-51
Marker DR, Strimbu K, McGrath MS, Zywiel MG, Mont MA. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty - review of comparative clinical and basic science studies. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67:120-7
Sandiford NA, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Skinner JA, Hua J. Metal on metal hip resurfacing versus uncemented custom total hip replacement-early results. J Orthop Surg Res 2010;5:8
Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, Higuchi F, Tagawa Y, Inoue A. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:505-11
Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological followup. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90:1137-42
Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin