Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

İlizarov eksternal fiksatörü ile karmaşık ayak deformitelerinin düzeltilmesi

Ilizarov external fixator for correction of complex foot deformities

Pages
72–76
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Ilizarov method appears to be an efficient approach thanks to the three dimensional characteristic of the foot and fixator in the correction of complicated foot deformities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of theIlizarov external fixator for the correction of complex footdeformities.Patients and methods: Between January 2000 andSeptember 2005, 29 feet of 25 patients (18 males, 7 females;mean age 13.7 years; range 5 to 24 years) who were appliedIlizarov external fixators due to complex foot deformitiesin our clinic were prospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The distribution of the deformitieswas as follows: hindfoot inversion (calcaneovarus) in 29,forefoot equines (cavus) in 29, forefoot adductus in 28,forefoot and hindfoot supination in 27 and forefoot andhindfoot pronation in one foot.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Ilizarov method appears to be an efficient approach thanks to the three dimensional characteristic of the foot and fixator in the correction of complicated foot deformities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of theIlizarov external fixator for the correction of complex footdeformities.Patients and methods: Between January 2000 andSeptember 2005, 29 feet of 25 patients (18 males, 7 females;mean age 13.7 years; range 5 to 24 years) who were appliedIlizarov external fixators due to complex foot deformitiesin our clinic were prospectively analyzed. Four patients hadbilateral foot deformity. The distribution of the deformitieswas as follows: hindfoot inversion (calcaneovarus) in 29,forefoot equines (cavus) in 29, forefoot adductus in 28,forefoot and hindfoot supination in 27 and forefoot andhindfoot pronation in one foot. The mean length of hospitalstay was 9.4 weeks (range, 6 to 18 weeks). Osteotomy wasrequired in nine patients with ages ranging from 13 to 24.Middle subtalar osteotomy was applied on six patients, whilethree patients received subtalar osteotomy. In three patients,release was provided by removal of incision scar tissue. Themean follow-up was 48 months (range, 16-65 months).Results: The mean treatment period was 21.6 weeks (range,18-31 weeks). All patients walked better following treatment.According to Paley’s criteria, 27 feet were evaluated as plantigrade (flat) and two as non-plantigrade (non-flat). Two patients suffered from pain. The success rate of the treatment was 86.2%. Conclusion: Ilizarov method appears to be an efficient approach thanks to the three dimensional characteristic of the foot and fixator in the correction of complicated foot deformities.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada karmaşık ayak deformitelerinin düzel- tilmesinde İlizarov eksternal fiksatörünün sonuçları değer-lendirildi.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Ocak 2000 ile Eylül 2005 tarih-leri arasında kliniğimizde karmaşık ayak deformitesi nede-niyle İlizarov eksternal fiksatörü uygulanan 25 hastanın (18 erkek, 7 kadın; ort. yaş 13.7 yıl; dağılım 5-24 yıl) 29ayağı prospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Dört hastada ikitaraflı ayak deformitesi vardı. Deformitelerin dağılımı şu şekildeydi: 29 ayakta arka ayak inversiyon (kalkaneova- rus), 29 ayakta ön ayak ekin (cavus), 28 ayakta ön ayak adduksiyon, 27 ayakta ön ve arka ayak supinasyonu ve bir ayakta ön ve arka ayak pronasyonu vardı. Ortalama hasta-nede kalış süresi 9.4 hafta (dağılım, 6-18 hafta) idi. Yaşları 13-24 arası olan dokuz hastada osteotomi gereksinimi oldu. Altı hastada orta subtalar osteotomi uygulanırken,üç hastada subtalar osteotomi uygulandı. Üç hastada kesiyerindeki skar dokusunun çıkarılması ile gevşetme sağ-landı. Ortalama takip süresi 48 ay (dağılım, 16-65 ay) idi.Bulgular: Hastaların tedavi süresi ortalama 21.6 hafta (dağı-lım, 13-31 hafta) idi. Tüm hastalar tedaviden sonra daha iyiyürüdü. Paley kriterlerine göre, 27 ayak plantigrade (düzbasma), iki ayak ise plantigrade olmayan (düz basamayan)olarak değerlendirildi. İki hastanın ağrısı vardı. Tedavinin başarı oranı %86.2 idi.Sonuç: İlizarov yöntemi, karmaşık ayak deformitele-rinin düzeltilmesinde, ayağın ve fiksatörün üç boyutlu özelliği sayesinde, etkili bir yaklaşım olarak görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, M., BOZKURT, M., ATEŞALP, S., UĞURLU, M., ÖÇGÜDER, D. A., TECİMEL, O. (2022). İlizarov eksternal fiksatörü ile karmaşık ayak deformitelerinin düzeltilmesi. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 72–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/498628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kocaoğlu M, Eralp L, Atalar AC, Bilen FE. Correction of complex foot deformities using the Ilizarov external fixator. J Foot Ankle Surg 2002;41:30-9
  2. Karakurt L, Yılmaz E, Ayhan Ö, Yekeler H, Yahşi S, Serin E. Soft tissue contractures in clubfoot: An immunohistochemical study. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2004;15:26-30
  3. Bradish CF, Noor S. The Ilizarov method in the management of relapsed club feet. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82:387-91
  4. Cummings RJ, Lovell WW. Operative treatment of congenital idiopathic club foot. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70:1108-12. 5. de la Huerta F. Correction of the neglected clubfoot by the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;301:89-93
  5. Grant AD, Atar D, Lehman WB. Ilizarov technique in correction of foot deformities: a preliminary report. Foot Ankle 1990;11:1-5
  6. Grill F, Franke J. The Ilizarov distractor for the correction of relapsed or neglected clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1987;69:593-7
  7. Herold HZ, Torok G. Surgical correction of neglected club foot in the older child and adult. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973;55:1385-95
  8. Paley D. The correction of complex foot deformities using Ilizarov’s distraction osteotomies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;97-111
  9. Velazquez RJ, Bell DF, Armstrong PF, Babyn P, Tibshirani R. Complications of use of the Ilizarov technique in the correction of limb deformities in children. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993;75:1148-56
  10. Kalenderer Ö, Ağuş H, Vatansever A, Özlük S, Şentürk H. Evaluation of structural changes in tarsal bones following complete subtalar release for congenital clubfoot. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2005;16:31-5
  11. Wallander H, Hansson G, Tjernström B. Correction of persistent clubfoot deformities with the Ilizarov external fixator. Experience in 10 previously operated feet followed for 2-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996;67:283-7
  12. Franke J, Grill F, Hein G, Simon M. Correction of clubfoot relapse using Ilizarov’s apparatus in children 8-15 years old. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990;110:33-7
  13. Green SA, editor. Transosseous osteosynthesis. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1992
  14. Bell DF, Boyer MI, Armstrong PF. The use of the Ilizarov technique in the correction of limb deformities associated with skeletal dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 1992;12:283-90
  15. Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;250:8-26
  16. Karapınar H, Akgün U, Kazımoğlu C, Bulut T, Sener M. Ilizarov augmentation