Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Artroskopik ön çapraz bağ onarımı için hamstring tendon otogreftine kıyasla kuadriseps tendon kullanımı: Klinik sonuçların karşılaştırmalı analizi

Use of quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparative analysis of clinical results

Pages
139–143
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft is superior to central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate midterm clinicalresults of the use of two autogenous graft types.Patients and methods: Between June 2005 and November2010, clinical data of 44 patients who were operated wereretrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Quadriceps tendon-patellar boneautograft was used for reconstruction surgery in 23 patients(QT-PB group), while quadrupled hamstring tendon autograftwas used in 21 patients (HT group).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft is superior to central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate midterm clinicalresults of the use of two autogenous graft types.Patients and methods: Between June 2005 and November2010, clinical data of 44 patients who were operated wereretrospectively analyzed. Quadriceps tendon-patellar boneautograft was used for reconstruction surgery in 23 patients(QT-PB group), while quadrupled hamstring tendon autograftwas used in 21 patients (HT group). The Tegner’s activity scale, Lysholm scoring system, single-leg-hop test and KT-2000 arthrometric measurements were used for data collection. Results: The mean length of follow-up was 37.6 months. Although the mean Lysholm score increased in both groups, excellent results in HT group were two-fold higher compared to QT-PB group. The mean laxity for the operated knee joint was 5.65 mm (3.5 to 8.0 mm) in QT-PB group and 3.67 mm (3.0 to 5.5 mm) in HT group. Head-to-head analysis using KT-2000 arthrometer demonstrated that 12 patients (52.1%) in QT-PB group and two patients (9.6%) in HT group had more than 3 mm of anterior laxity difference. Conclusion: Quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft is superior to central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, iki otojen greft türünün kullanımına ilişkin orta dönem klinik sonuçlar değerlendirildi. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Haziran 2005 - Kasım 2010 tarihleri arasında ameliyat edilen 44 hastanın klinik verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Onarım cerrahisi için 23 hastada (QT-PB grubu) kuadriseps tendon-patella kemiği otogrefti, 21 hastada (HT grubu) ise dört katlı hamstring tendon otogrefti kullanıldı. Veri toplamada Tegner aktivite skalası, Lysholmskorlama sistemi, tek bacak sıçrama testi ve KT-2000 artrometrik ölçümleri kullanıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama takip süresi 37.6 aydı. Ortalama Lysholm skoru her iki grupta da artmasına rağmen, HTgrubunda elde edilen mükemmel sonuçlar QT-PB grubundakinin iki katı kadardı. Ortalama laksite miktarı QT-PB grubunda 5.65 mm (3.5-8.0 mm) iken HT grubunda 3.67 mm (3.0-5.5 mm) olarak ölçüldü. KT-2000 artrometre kullanıla- rak yapılan bire bir analizde QT-PB grubunda 12 hastada (%52.1) ve HT grubunda iki hastada (%9.6) 3 mm’den fazla ön laksite farkı saptandı.Sonuç: Artroskopik ön çapraz bağ onarım cerrahisinde dört katlı hamstring tendon otogrefti, santral kuadriseps tendon- patella kemiği otogreftinden üstündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, V., ISSIN, A., SOFU, H., YILDIRIM, T., GÜRSU, S., ORDUERİ, M. (2022). Artroskopik ön çapraz bağ onarımı için hamstring tendon otogreftine kıyasla kuadriseps tendon kullanımı: Klinik sonuçların karşılaştırmalı analizi. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 139–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/498604

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akkaya S, Serinken M, Akkaya N, Türkçüer I, Uyanik E. Football injuries on synthetic turf fields. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2011;22:155-9
  2. Öztürk S, Kılıç D. What is the economic burden of sports injuries? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2013;24:108-11
  3. Clark JC, Rueff DE, Indelicato PA, Moser M. Primary ACL reconstruction using allograft tissue. Clin Sports Med 2009;28:223-44
  4. Özenci AM, İnanmaz E, Söyüncü Y, Ürgüden M, Şentürk S, Gür S, et al. Fresh-frozen allograft reconstruction in chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency Eklem Hastalık Cerrahisi 2004;15:15-20
  5. Romanini E, D’Angelo F, De Masi S, Adriani E, Magaletti M, Lacorte E, et al. Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 2010;11:211-9
  6. Zantop T, Petersen W, Sekiya JK, Musahl V, Fu FH. Anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function relating to anatomical reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14:982-92
  7. Dopirak RM, Adamany DC, Steensen RN. A comparison of autogenous patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics 2004;27:837-42
  8. Poolman RW, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Hamstring tendon autograft better than bone patellar-tendon bone autograft in ACL reconstruction: a cumulative meta-analysis and clinically relevant sensitivity analysis applied to a previously published analysis. Acta Orthop 2007;78:350-4
  9. Geib TM, Shelton WR, Phelps RA, Clark L. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcome. Arthroscopy 2009;25:1408-14
  10. Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:2-11
  11. Kuşkucu M, Pehlivan Ö, Solakoğlu C, Kaplan H. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament rupture using four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Eklem Hastalık Cerrahisi 2003;14:209-13
  12. Atik OS. Is reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament a prerequisite for restoring muscle function? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2009;20:125-6
  13. Graham SM, Parker RD. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;402:64-75
  14. Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Chang SK, Marumoto JM, Richardson AB. A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciat