Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Primer total diz artroplastide arka kondiler aks +3 derece dış rotasyon çizgisi veklinik transepikondiler aks çizgisi teknikleri arasındaki tutarlılığın araştırılması

An investigation of consistency between posterior condylar axis +3 degree external rotation line and clinical transepicondylar axis line techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty

Pages
70–74
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a significant difference (McNamara chi square=12.7±1; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate discrepancy between posterior condylar axis (PCA)+3 degree external rotation (ER) line and clinical transepicondylar axis (cTEA) line and consistency between the both techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Thirty-six knees [Bilateral knees were operated simultaneously in 12 patients (50%)] in 24 patients [3 men (12.5%), 21 women (87.5%); average age 67 (59-80 age)] were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a significant difference (McNamara chi square=12.7±1; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate discrepancy between posterior condylar axis (PCA)+3 degree external rotation (ER) line and clinical transepicondylar axis (cTEA) line and consistency between the both techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty. Patients and methods: Thirty-six knees [Bilateral knees were operated simultaneously in 12 patients (50%)] in 24 patients [3 men (12.5%), 21 women (87.5%); average age 67 (59-80 age)] were included in the study. During surgery, PCA+3° ER line and cTEA line were drawn on the distal femoral cutting surface by electrocautery pencil following distal femoral cut. The both lines on distal femur were recorded by digital camera and relationship between lines was ascertained in reference to PCA+3° ER line [parallel, internal rotation (IR), ER]. Statistical analysis was performed by the McNamara chi square test and Kappa (k) value. Results: Assessment of the images revealed that cTEA line in comparison to PCA+3° ER line was parallel in 22 knees (61.2%), but not parallel in 14 knees (38.8%) [IR in 10 knees (71.5%), ER in 4 knees (28.5%)]. There was a significant difference (McNamara chi square=12.7±1; p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada primer total diz protezi uygulamalarında posteriyor kondiler aks (PKA)+3 derece dış rotasyon (DR) çizgisi ve klinik transepikondiler aks (kTEA) çizgisi arasındaki farklılık ve her iki teknik arasındaki tutarlılık araştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Yirmi dört hastanın [3 erkek (%12.5), 21 kadın (%87.5); ortalama yaş 67 (59-80 yaş)] 36 dizi [12 hastada her iki diz aynı seansta eşzamanlı olarak ameliyat edildi (%50)] çalışmaya alındı. Cerrahi sırasında distal femur kesisini takiben kesi yüzeyine koter ucu ile PKA+3° DR çizgisi ve kTEA çizgisi çizildi. Distal femur üzerinde bulunan her iki çizgi dijital kamera ile kaydedildi ve PKA+3° DR çizgisi referans alınarak çizgiler arasındaki ilişki araştırıldı [paralel, iç rotasyon (İR), DR]. İstatistiksel analiz McNamara ki kare testi ve Kappa (k) değeri ile yapıldı.Bulgular: Görüntüler değerlendirildiğinde, kTEA çizgisinin PKA+3° DR çizgisine kıyasla 22 dizde (%61.2) paralel olduğu, 14 dizde ise paralel olmadığı (%38.8) [10 dizde İR (%71.5), 4 dizde DR (%28.5)] tespit edildi. Çizgiler arasında belirgin bir farklılık (McNamara ki kare=12.7±1; p

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYA, H., MARALCAN, G., ÖZCAN, Ö. (2022). Primer total diz artroplastide arka kondiler aks +3 derece dış rotasyon çizgisi veklinik transepikondiler aks çizgisi teknikleri arasındaki tutarlılığın araştırılması. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 70–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/498600

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;336:155-63.
  2. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;287:170-7.
  3. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:40-7.
  4. Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;321:168-72.
  5. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;192:13-22. Laskin RS. Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:657-60.
  6. Olcott CW, Scott RD. Determining proper femoral component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 2000;13:166-8.
  7. Stiehl JB, Abbott BD. Femoral component rotational alignment using the extramedullary tibial shaft axis: A technical note. J Orthop Rheumatol 1995;8:93-6.
  8. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;356:111-8.
  9. Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;290:259-68.
  10. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69:873-80.
  11. Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA. Determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:301-5.
  12. Akagi M, Yamashita E, Nakagawa T, Asano T, Nakamura T. Relationship between frontal knee alignment and reference axes in the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;388:147-56.
  13. Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL. Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:354-9.
  14. Berger RA, Rubash HE. Rotational instability and malrotation after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2001;32:639-47.
  15. Insall JN, Kelly M. The total condylar prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:43-8.
  16. Ozcan O, Boya H, Ateş A, Doğruöz F. B