SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Çimentosuz ve aşırı düzeyde poroz kaplamalı monolitik kırık femur başı revizyonu için minimal invaziv delikli trepan tekniği önerilir: Üç olgu değerlendirmesi

Minimally invasive hollow trephine technique is recommended for revision of broken uncemented and extensively porous-coated monolithic femoral stems: a review of three cases

Boris STENO
Libor NECAS
Marian MELİSİK
Jozef ALMASİ
Pages
112–116
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Minimally invasive technique for broken and uncemented femoral stem is recommended

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Revisions of fractured, uncemented and extensively porous-coated femoral stems are challenging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article, we report three cases of revision surgeries for broken, cementless, and extensively porous-coated femoral stems with Solution(TM) stems (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Minimally invasive technique for broken and uncemented femoral stem is recommended
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Revisions of fractured, uncemented and extensively porous-coated femoral stems are challenging. In this article, we report three cases of revision surgeries for broken, cementless, and extensively porous-coated femoral stems with Solution(TM) stems (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana). In all cases, minimally invasive endofemoral revision was successfully performed without femoral osteotomy or cortical fenestration. Removal of distal broken femoral stem was performed with hollow trephine technique under fluoroscopy. For revision arthroplasty of the femoral component, Solution(TM) stems of larger diameter were used. Endofemoral approach reduces duration of surgery and the amount of blood and bone loss. Minimally invasive technique for broken and uncemented femoral stem is recommended

Özet

Kırık, çimentosuz ve aşırı düzeyde poroz kaplamalı femur başlarının revizyonu güçtür. Bu yazıda, çimentosuz ve aşırı düzeyde poroz kaplamalı kırık femur başlarının Solution(TM) başlar (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana) ile revizyon cerrahisi uygulanan üç olgu sunuldu. Tüm olgularda femur osteoto- misi veya kortikal fenestrasyon olmaksızın, minimal inva- ziv endofemoral revizyon başarıyla yapıldı. Distal kırık femur başı, skopi altında delikli trepan tekniği ile temiz- lendi. Femur komponentinin revizyon artroplastisinde daha büyük Solution(TM) başlar kullanıldı. Endofemoral yaklaşım ameliyat süresini ve kan ve kemik kaybı miktarını azaltır. Kırık ve çimentosuz femur başlarında minimal invaziv teknik önerilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

STENO, B., NECAS, L., MELİSİK, M., ALMASİ, J. (2022). Çimentosuz ve aşırı düzeyde poroz kaplamalı monolitik kırık femur başı revizyonu için minimal invaziv delikli trepan tekniği önerilir: Üç olgu değerlendirmesi. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 112–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/498568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85:27-32.
  2. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup D, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;319:168-77.
  3. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):134-7.
  4. Bush CA, Charles MN, Haydon CM, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW. Fractures of distally- fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87:1333-6.
  5. Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW. Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2001;393:181-93.
  6. Meek RMD, Greidans NV, Garbus DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Extended trochanteric osteotomy: planing, surgical technique, and pitfalls. In: Helfet DL, editor. Instr Course Lect. Vol 53. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2004. p. 119-30.
  7. Hozack WJ, Wade FA. Removal of components and cement. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, editors. The adult hip. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 1352-70. Teoh SH. Fatigue of biomaterials: a review. Int J Fatigue 2000;22:825-37.
  8. Lu HC, Lin CL, Chang CW, Lai KA. Fracture of VerSys fully bead-coated long femoral stems: report on four fractures in 41 hips. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2012;28:345-9.
  9. Beal MD, Marchie A, Black E, Malchau H, Burke D. Treatment of a well-fixed modular fully porous coated stem after fracture using a custom rescue sleeve. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:1301-3. Tóth K, Sisák K, Nagy J, Manó S, Csernátony Z. Retrograde stem removal in revision hip surgery: removing a loose or broken femoral component with a retrograde nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010;130:813-8.
  10. Sangüesa-Nebot MJ, Soriano FC, Gabarda RF, Mordt CV. Revision hip arthroplasty with a short femoral component in fractured hydroxyapatite fully coated femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:1168.e13-6. Tanaka T, Hamada K, Oshima K, Joyama S, Naka N, Araki N. A new strategy to remove broken femoral mega- prostheses with hollow trephine reamers. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013;23:357-60.
  11. Bekler HI, Erdağ Y, Ozşahin M. Intrapelvic protrusion of the ceramic head resulting from forte ceramic liner fracture without a significant trauma: a case report