Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Teikoplanin'in kırık iyileşmesi üzerine etkisi: Deneysel çalışma

The effect of teicoplanin on fracture healing: an experimental study

Pages
16–21
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in respect of bone and vascular total volume (p 0.05).Conclusion: In addition to its antibacterial effect, teicoplanin may increase new bone formation; thus, it may be used safely in the treatment of bone defects accompanied with infection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effect of teicoplanin on fracture healing stereologically and histopatologically.Materials and methods: Twenty male Wistar albino rats were separated into two as the study (teicoplanin) and control groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After intramedullary fixation of the right tibia of all the rats with 0.5 mm Kirschner wire under general anesthesia, standard closed shaft fractures were created using fracture formation apparatus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in respect of bone and vascular total volume (p 0.05).Conclusion: In addition to its antibacterial effect, teicoplanin may increase new bone formation; thus, it may be used safely in the treatment of bone defects accompanied with infection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effect of teicoplanin on fracture healing stereologically and histopatologically.Materials and methods: Twenty male Wistar albino rats were separated into two as the study (teicoplanin) and control groups. After intramedullary fixation of the right tibia of all the rats with 0.5 mm Kirschner wire under general anesthesia, standard closed shaft fractures were created using fracture formation apparatus. Teicoplanin (10 mg/kg) and saline were administered intraperitoneally to the study and control groups, respectively. Control radiographs were taken at the end of the procedure and the rats were sacrificed after 28 days. New bone and connective tissue volumes were calculated on obtained tissue samples using unbiased stereological and histopathological techniques.Results: It was observed that teicoplanin increased the formation of bone, vascularization, and connective tissue. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in respect of bone and vascular total volume (p 0.05).Conclusion: In addition to its antibacterial effect, teicoplanin may increase new bone formation; thus, it may be used safely in the treatment of bone defects accompanied with infection.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada teikoplanin'in kırık iyileşmesi üzerine etkisi stereolojik ve histopatolojik olarak incelendi.Gereç ve yöntemler: Yirmi adet Wistar-albino erkek sıçan çalışma (teikoplanin) ve kontrol grubu olarak ikiye ayrıldı. Genel anestezi altında tüm sıçanların sağ tibiaları intramedüller olarak 0.5 mm'lik Kirschner teli ile tespit edildikten sonra kırık oluşturma aparatı ile standart kapalı cisim kırıkları oluşturuldu. Çalışma ve kontrol grubuna intraperitoneal olarak sırasıyla 10 mg/kg teikoplanin ve serum fizyolojik uygulandı. İşlem sonunda kontrol grafileri çekildi ve 28 gün sonra tüm sıçanlar sakrifiye edildi. Elde edilen doku örnekleri üzerinde tarafsız stereolojik ve histopatolojik yöntemler kullanılarak yeni kemik ve bağ doku hacimleri hesaplandı.Bulgular: Teikoplanin'in kemik, damar ve bağ dokusu oluşumunu artırdığı gözlendi. Kemik ve damar total hacminde iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık vardı (p 0.05).Sonuç: Teikoplanin antibakteriyel etkisinin yanı sıra yeni kemik oluşumunu artırabilir; böylelikle, enfeksiyonla birlikte görülen kemik defektlerinin tedavisinde güvenle kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖÇER, H., ÖNGER, M. E., ÇIRAKLI, A., KUYUBAŞI, N., KIR, M. Ç. (2022). Teikoplanin'in kırık iyileşmesi üzerine etkisi: Deneysel çalışma. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 16–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/498497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mujagic E, Zwimpfer T, Marti WR, Zwahlen M, Hoffmann H, Kindler C, et al. Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014;15:188
  2. Xu SG, Mao ZG, Liu BS, Zhu HH, Pan HL. Evaluating the use of antibiotic prophylaxis during open reduction and internal fixation surgery in patients at low risk of surgical site infection. Injury 2015;46:184-8
  3. Oktaş B, Orhan Z, Erbil B, Değirmenci E, Ustündağ N. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on fracture healing in rat femural fractures with intact and excised periosteum. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2014;25:158-62
  4. Toğral G, Arıkan M, Korkusuz P, Hesar RH, Ekşioğlu MF. Positive effect of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, on fracture healing in rat femur. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2015;26:137-44
  5. Soriano A, Popescu D, García S, Bori G, Martínez JA, Balasso V, et al. Usefulness of teicoplanin for preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in orthopedic surgery. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;25:35-8
  6. Tatari H, Fidan M, Erbil G, Koyuncuoglu M, Karci T, Destan H, et al. A new device to produce a standardized experimental fracture in the rat tibia. Saudi Med J 2007;28:866-71
  7. Ulstrup AK. Biomechanical concepts of fracture healing in weight-bearing long bones. Acta Orthop Belg 2008;74:291-302
  8. Shapiro F. Bone development and its relation to fracture repair. The role of mesenchymal osteoblasts and surface osteoblasts. Eur Cell Mater 2008;15:53-76
  9. Egol KA, Bechtel C, Spitzer AB, Rybak L, Walsh M, Davidovitch R. Treatment of long bone nonunions: factors affecting healing. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2012;70:224-31
  10. Preston CF, Egol KA. Midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67:52-7
  11. Green E, Lubahn JD, Evans J. Risk factors, treatment, and outcomes associated with nonunion of the midshaft humerus fracture. J Surg Orthop Adv 2005;14:64-72
  12. Akkaya S, Nazalı M, Kılıç A, Bir F. Cefazolin-sodium has no adverse effect on fracture healing in an experimental rabbit model. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2012;23:44-8
  13. Rathbone CR, Cross JD, Brown KV, Murray CK, Wenke JC. Effect of various concentrations of antibiotics on osteogenic cell viability and activity. J Orthop Res 2011;29:1070-4
  14. Haleem AA, Rouse MS, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Gentamicin and vancomycin do not impair experimental fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;427: