SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EĞİTİM VE İNSANİ BİLİMLER DERGİSİ: TEORİ VE UYGULAMA / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 10

Achievement Goal Orientation and Its Relation to Academic Achievement

Başarı Hedef Oryantasyonu ve Akademik Başarı ile İlişkisi

Ümmügülsüm KORKMAZ
Pages
137–147
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review has implications for educators and policy makers that have influence on children’s achievement

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present review aims to discuss the achievement goal orientation and its relation to academic achievement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkish motivation studies lacking a recent achievement goal orientation measurement, Elliot & McGregor’s (2001) Achievement Goal Orientation Framework that has four goals: performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-avoidance and mastery-approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review has implications for educators and policy makers that have influence on children’s achievement
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Başarı hedef uyumu · Akademik başarı · Motivasyon

Abstract

The present review aims to discuss the achievement goal orientation and its relation to academic achievement. A special attention was given to Turkish motivation studies with mentioning the importance of cultural concept. Turkish motivation studies lacking a recent achievement goal orientation measurement, Elliot & McGregor’s (2001) Achievement Goal Orientation Framework that has four goals: performance-approach, performance-avoidance, mastery-avoidance and mastery-approach. Researching these four goal orientations would improve the understanding of student’s achievement motives that would affect their success. This review has implications for educators and policy makers that have influence on children’s achievement

Özet

Bu alan yazım taraması öğrencilerin başarıya yönelik hedef uyumlarını ve bu uyumların akademik başarıyla ilişkisini araştırmaktadır. Özellikle, kültürel anlayışın önemine değinilerek, Türkiye’de yapılan motivasyon çalışmalarından bahsedilmiştir. Türkiye’de motivasyonun akademik başarı ile ilişkisi araştırılırken güncel motivasyon ölçme araçlarından birisi olan Elliot ve McGregor’un (2001) 2X2 Başarı Hedef Oryantasyonu Yapısı kullanıldığı görülmemiştir. Bu yapının önemi, motivasyonda çoklu hedefleri benimsemesidir (görevyaklaşma, görev-uzaklaşma, performans-yaklaşma ve performans-uzaklaşma). Bu dört hedef uyumu çalışılarak öğrencilerin başarısını etkileyen motivasyon durumları daha iyi anlaşılabilir. Bu çalışma, eğitimciler ve program geliştiriciler için öneriler içermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, Ü. (2022). Achievement Goal Orientation and Its Relation to Academic Achievement. EĞİTİM VE İNSANİ BİLİMLER DERGİSİ: TEORİ VE UYGULAMA, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 10, 137–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/498191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Cansever, G. (1968). The achievement motive in Turkish adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 76, 269-270.
  2. Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 948–963. doi: 10.1037/a0016096 Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affect learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
  3. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). 2X2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.80.3.501 Ergene, T. (2011). The relationships among test anxiety, study habits, achievement, motivation, and academic performance among Turkish high school students. Education and Science, 36, 320-330.
  4. Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422-449. doi: 10.1037/a0018947 Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2002). Should childhood be a journey or a race? Response to Harackiewicz et al. (2002). Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 646-468.
  5. Keys, T. D., Conley, A. M., Duncan, G. J., & Domina, T. (2012). The role of goal orientations for adolescent mathematics achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.09.002 Kimmel, K., & Volet, S. E. (2010). Culture in motivation research: A challenging and enriching contribution. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, & P. Peterson, (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 576-584).
  6. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Korkmaz, U. (2014). Predicting academic achievement: The role of parenting, nonverbal intelligence, and goal orientation in Turkish children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77 Moenikiaa, M. & Zahed-Babelan, A. (2010). A study of simple and multiple relations between mathematics attitude, academic motivation and intelligence quotient with mathematics achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1537-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.231 Phalet, K., & Cl