Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Yüksek Dereceden Faktör Analizi Yorumlama Tekniklerinin İncelenmesi

A Review of Higher-Order Factor Analysis Interpretation Strategies

Pages
72–94
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Advantages of each method are discussed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present paper was to summarize exploratory second and third-order factor analyses and explain interpretation strategies for the higher-order factors, specifically, Gorsuch's product matrix, the Schmid and Leiman solution, and Thompson's orthogonally rotated product matrix solution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Exploratory factor analysis is a multivariate technique to reveal information about latent constructs from the measured variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Advantages of each method are discussed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper was to summarize exploratory second and third-order factor analyses and explain interpretation strategies for the higher-order factors, specifically, Gorsuch's product matrix, the Schmid and Leiman solution, and Thompson's orthogonally rotated product matrix solution. Exploratory factor analysis is a multivariate technique to reveal information about latent constructs from the measured variables. When researchers choose an oblique rotation, they believe either their factors are correlated or the best solution will result from an oblique rotation. Whenever primary factors are correlated, extracting higher-order factors from an inter-factor correlation matrix is vitally important to understand data from a different perspective. The SAS syntax is provided along with heuristic datasets to assist interested researchers in exploring the techniques. Advantages of each method are discussed

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ikinci ve üçüncü dereceden faktör analizi özetlenip yorumlama teknikleri incelendi. Özellikle Gorsuch'un çarpım matrisi, Schmid ve Leiman çözümü ve Thompson'un dikey döndürülmüş çarpım matrisi incelendi. Keşif amaçlı faktör analizi çok degişkenli bir istatistiksel teknik olup, gizil durumdaki faktörleri ölçülen değişkenlerden ortaya çıkarmayı amaç edinir. Araştırmacılar eğik olarak döndürülmüş stratejiyi seçtiklerinde, faktörler arasında bir ilişki olduğuna veya en iyi çözümün eğik olarak döndürülmüş stratejiden elde edileceğini düşünürler. Birinci dereceden elde edilen faktörler birbirleriyle ilişkili olduğunda, bu foktörlerin oluşturduğu korrelasyon matrisi ikinci dereceden faktörleri elde etmede kullanılır ve bu elde edilen ikinci dereceden faktörler veriye farklı açılardan bakmakta oldukça önemli bir yer tutar. Çalısmanın anlaşılır olması için iki farklı örnek SAS kodları ile birlikte verildi. Her stratejinin avantajları tartışıldı

🔖

Cite This Article

NAVRUZ, B., M.CAPRARO, M., BICER, A., CAPRARO, R. M. (2022). Yüksek Dereceden Faktör Analizi Yorumlama Tekniklerinin İncelenmesi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 72–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/497239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Borrello, G. M., & Thompson, B. (1990). An hierarchical analysis of the Hendrick-Hendrick measure of Lee's typology of love. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 327-342. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/617883421?accountid=7082
  2. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, B. (2001). Users' hierarchical perspectives on library service quality: A "LibQUAL+TM" study. College and Research Libraries, 62, 147-153. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/62/2/147.full.pdf
  3. Cook, C., & Thompson, B. (2000). Higher-order factor analytic perspectives on users' perceptions of library service quality. Library Information Science Research, 22, 393-404. doi:10.1016/S0740- 8188(00)00052-9
  4. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Henson, R., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2004). Reporting practice and use of exploratory factor analysis in educational research journals: Errors and explanations. Research in the Schools, 11(2), 61- 72. Retrieved from http://unt.edu/rss/class/Jon/MiscDocs/2004HensonCapraroCapraro.pdf
  5. Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 48, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30, 179- 185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447 Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116 Kline, R. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  6. Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrica, 22, 53-61. doi:10.1007/BF02289209 Spearman, C. (1904). "General intelligence," Objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201-292. doi:10.2307/1412107 Thompson, B. (1990). SECONDOR: A program that computes a second-order principal components analysis and various interpretation aids. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 575-580. doi:10.1177/0013164490503011 Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: Uses and interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington