Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Academic Jealousy Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Pages
467–479
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the Academic Jealousy Scale developed according to these findings, is a valid measurement tool and will give reliable scores in measuring academic jealousy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to develop a measurement tool to determine the level of academic jealousy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, firstly, the literature was examined, and a theoretical framework was formed, and then an item set of 47 items was created.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the Academic Jealousy Scale developed according to these findings, is a valid measurement tool and will give reliable scores in measuring academic jealousy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to develop a measurement tool to determine the level of academic jealousy. For this purpose, firstly, the literature was examined, and a theoretical framework was formed, and then an item set of 47 items was created. The items that were submitted to expert opinion were eliminated and corrected, and 41 items were decided to use, and a trial form was obtained. In this study, 478 university students were reached. One-on-one interviews were conducted with ten students who are studying at Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University before the trial application. Then, the trial form was applied to 254 university students, and the data obtained were analyzed with Exploratory Factor Analysis, and as a result of this analysis, a structure with three factors (maturity, self-denigration, and envy) was revealed. In order to test the defined structure, the final form of the scale was applied to another group of 154 people, and the data obtained were subjected to Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and goodness of fit indices of the scale was found to be between good fit or acceptable fit. Accordingly, the structure with 19-item and three factors was confirmed Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the whole scale was found .779, Envy subfactor was found .840; self-denigration subfactor was found .840 and Maturity subfactor was found .817. In order to determine the reliability of the scale in terms of stability, the scale was applied to a different group of 57 people at two-week intervals, and the correlation between the two applications was recorded as .89. It was concluded that the Academic Jealousy Scale developed according to these findings, is a valid measurement tool and will give reliable scores in measuring academic jealousy.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇAK, D. (2022). Academic Jealousy Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 467–479. https://ajindex.com/articles/497214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Afifi, W. A., & Reichert, T. (1996). Understanding the role of uncertainty in jealousy experience and expression. Communication Reports, 9(1), 93-103.
  2. Anderson, R. E. (2002). Envy and jealousy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 56(4), 455-480. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2002.56.4.455 Aune, K. S., & Comstock, J. (1991). Experience and expression of jealousy: Comparison between friends and romantics. Psychological Reports, 69(1), 315-319. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.315 Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: Klasik test teorisi ve uygulaması. Ankara:
  3. ÖSYM Yayınları.
  4. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 Brehm, S.S. (1992).
  5. Intimate relationships. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Bringle, R. G., & Williams, L. J. (1979). Parental off-spring similarity on jealousy and related personality dimensions. Motivation and Emotion, 3(3), 265-286. doi: 10.1007/BF01904230 Bringle, R. G., Roach, S., Andler, C., & Evenbeck, S. (1979). Measuring the intensity of jealousy reactions. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 9, 23-24.
  6. Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7(6), 359-379.
  7. Buunk, B., & Bringle, R. G. (1987). Jealousy in love relationships. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 123-147).
  8. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Çokluk, Ö., & Koçak, D. (2016): Using Horn’s parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(2), 537-551.
  9. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları (3rd Ed.). Ankara:
  10. Pegem Akademi. Demir B (2004). Ankara atatürk eğitim ve araştırma hastanesi örneğinde hastane organizasyonu içerisinde hekim-hemşire ilişkisinin çatışma ve güç ilişkileri açısından analizi: Sosyo ekonomik düzeyin, eğitimin, cinsiyet ve çalışma süresinin etkileri (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  11. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  12. Demirtaş, H. A. (2004). Yakın ilişkilerde kıskançlık (bireysel, ilişkisel ve durumsal değişkenler) (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Biliml