Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

An Application of Latent Class Analysis for TIMSS 2015 Data: Detecting Heterogeneous Subgroups

Pages
321–335
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the LCA, supporting absolute and relative model fit indices through AvePP and entropy values, it was concluded that the data obtained from both countries fit the three-class model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate the heterogeneity of the TIMSS 2015 data from Turkey and the USA 8th grade math.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to determine the latent classes that cause heterogeneity in the data by using categorical observed variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the LCA, supporting absolute and relative model fit indices through AvePP and entropy values, it was concluded that the data obtained from both countries fit the three-class model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Latent class analysis · TIMSS 2015 · heterogeneity

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the heterogeneity of the TIMSS 2015 data from Turkey and the USA 8th grade math. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to determine the latent classes that cause heterogeneity in the data by using categorical observed variables. As a result of the LCA, supporting absolute and relative model fit indices through AvePP and entropy values, it was concluded that the data obtained from both countries fit the three-class model. The latent class probabilities and conditional response probabilities were examined for homogeneity and degree of segregation of the classes from each other. Based on the findings, it is recommended that the assumption of homogeneity in international evaluations be evaluated empirically with LCA. With this article, an example of the application of LCA is provided, and it is believed to be useful for researchers in the context of education and psychological evaluation.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAATÇİOĞLU, F. M. (2022). An Application of Latent Class Analysis for TIMSS 2015 Data: Detecting Heterogeneous Subgroups. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 321–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/497172

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
  2. Baghaei, P., & Carstensen, C. H. (2013). Fitting the mixture Rasch model to a reading comprehension test: Identifying reader types. Practical Assessment, Rese, 18(5), 1–13. doi: 10.7275/n191-pt86 Bolt, D. M., Cohen, A. S., & Wollack, J. A. (2002). Item parameter estimation under conditions of test speededness: Application of a mixture Rasch model with ordinal constraints. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 331-348. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2002.tb01146.x Butera, N. M., Lanza, S. T., & Coffman, D. L. (2014). A framework for estimating causal effects in latent class analysis: Is there a causal link between early sex and subsequent profiles of delinquency? Prevention Science, 15(3), 397– 407. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0417-3
  3. Chung, H., Park, Y., & Lanza, S. T. (2005). Latent transition analysis with covariates: Pubertal timing and substance use behaviours in adolescent females. Statistics in Medicine, 24, 2895-2910. doi: 10.1002/sim.2148 Clark, S. L. (2010). Mixture modeling with behavioral data (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles. Eid, M., Langeheine, R., & Diener, E. (2003). Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis: A primer. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 195-210. doi: 10.1177/0022022102250427 Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. 2009 Manuscript submitted for publication. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/relatinglca.pdf
  4. Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New Jersey: Wiley. De Ayala, R. J., & Santiago, S. Y. (2017). An introduction to mixture item response theory models. Journal of School Psychology, 60, 25-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.01.002 DeMars, C. E., & Lau, A. (2011). Differential item functioning detection with latent classes: How accurately detect who is responding differentially? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(4), 597–616. doi:10.1177/0013164411404221 Embretson, S. E. (2007). Mixture Rasch models for measurement in cognitive psychology. In M. von Davier & C. H. Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models: Extensions and applications (pp. 235-253). New York: Springer