Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of Variables Explaining Science Literacy in PISA 2015 Turkey Sample

Pages
145–163
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the variable that best explains the science literacy of Turkish students is “the number of books in the home”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to examine the variables that explain science literacy with the answers given by Turkish students to the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 student questionnaire.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Turkish sample of the research, which was conducted in a relational scanning model, is composed of 5895 students selected through a stratified sampling design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the variable that best explains the science literacy of Turkish students is “the number of books in the home”.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:PISA · science literacy · data mining

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the variables that explain science literacy with the answers given by Turkish students to the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 student questionnaire. The Turkish sample of the research, which was conducted in a relational scanning model, is composed of 5895 students selected through a stratified sampling design. The sample of the study consists of 3052 people who remained after the data containing missing values were removed. In this study, Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) method, which is one of the data mining decision tree algorithms, was used for data analysis. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the variable that best explains the science literacy of Turkish students is “the number of books in the home”. Other variables explaining the science literacy of Turkish students were also investigated in detail. In the research, gain values were examined to determine the most effective node in separating successful and unsuccessful students. As a result, it was seen that the most effective node consisted of students with science self-efficacy among students who had more than 200 books at home, and those who had more than 40 course hours in a week at school.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOĞAR, H., ZEYBEKOĞLU, Ş. (2022). Investigation of Variables Explaining Science Literacy in PISA 2015 Turkey Sample. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 145–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/497148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Acar, T., & Öğretmen, T. (2012). Çok düzeyli istatistiksel yöntemler ile 2006 PISA fen bilimleri performanslarının incelenmesi [Analysis of 2006 PISA Science Performance via Multilevel Statistical Methods]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(163), 178-189. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/1040/346
  2. Acısu, S. (2002). Koruma altında olan lise ve meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin mesleki olgunluk düzeylerinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Vocational maturity level of high school and vocational high school students who are under the protection of SHÇEK] (Thesis No. 113167) [Unpublished master’s thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  3. Akpullukçu, S. (2011). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde araştırmaya dayalı öğrenme ortamının öğrencilerin akademik başarı, hatırda tutma düzeyi ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of inquiry based learning environment in science and technology course on the students? academic achivements, attitudes and retention level] (Thesis No. 286479) [Master’s thesis, Dokuz Eylül University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  4. Aksu, G., & Karaman, H. (2016). CHAID Analizi (Otomatik Ki-Kare Etkileşim Belirleme Analizi) [CHAID Analysis (Automatic Chi-Square Interaction Determination Analysis)]. C. O. Güzeller (Ed.), Herkes için çok değişkenli istatistik [Multivariate statistics for everyone] (s. 245-266).
  5. Maya Akademi. Anagün, Ş. S. (2008). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinde yapılandırmacı öğrenme yoluyla fen okuryazarlığının geliştirilmesi: Bir eylem araştırması [Improving scientific literacy levels of the fifth grade students by constructivist learning: An action research] (Thesis No. 229235) [Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  6. Anagün, Ş. S. (2011). PISA 2006 sonuçlarına göre öğrenme-öğretme süreci değişkenlerinin öğrencilerin fen okuryazarlığına etkisi [The impact of teaching-learning process variables to the students’ scientific literacy levels based on PISA 2006 results]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 84-102. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/503
  7. Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-914