SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Changing Paradigms, Subjects, and Approaches in Industrial Design Studio Education in Turkey

Filiz YENİLMEZ
H. Hümanur BAĞLI
Pages
754–775
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a resultof the interviews carried out with the design educators, this research revealed the subject and approach oriented practices in industrial design studio courses within the context of changing interest areasof the designdiscipline.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Boundaries of industrial design discipline are expanding rapidly through new concepts that have emerged in recent years such as service design, experience design, sustainability, and social design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additionally, the new approaches featuring co-design as collaborationand interdisciplinary approaches have started to take part in the agenda of design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a resultof the interviews carried out with the design educators, this research revealed the subject and approach oriented practices in industrial design studio courses within the context of changing interest areasof the designdiscipline.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Boundaries of industrial design discipline are expanding rapidly through new concepts that have emerged in recent years such as service design, experience design, sustainability, and social design. Additionally, the new approaches featuring co-design as collaborationand interdisciplinary approaches have started to take part in the agenda of design. In the framework of these developments, this study aims to discover subject and approach centered changes in industrial design studio educationover the last twenty years. Accordingly, the compulsory design studio course, which is considered as the cornerstone of industrial design education, wasdefined as the research field and the semi-structured interview technique as a qualitative research method was used. As a resultof the interviews carried out with the design educators, this research revealed the subject and approach oriented practices in industrial design studio courses within the context of changing interest areasof the designdiscipline.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENİLMEZ, F., BAĞLI, H. H. (2022). Changing Paradigms, Subjects, and Approaches in Industrial Design Studio Education in Turkey. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 754–775. https://ajindex.com/articles/496967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Armstrong, L., Bailey, J, Julier, G., & Kimbell, L. (2014). Social design futures: HEI research and AHRC. Brighton: University of Brighton and Victoria and Albert Museum. Aydınlı, S. (2015). Tasarım eğitiminde yapılandırıcı paradigma. Tasarım ve Kuram, 11(20), 1–18. DOI:10.23835/tasarimkuram.239579 Brandenburg, T. (2018). Friendship, collaboration, and service: How Shelley Evenson and Birgit Mager designed a movement.Retrieved from https://www.service-design-network.org/community-knowledge/friendship-collaboration-and-service-how-shelley-evenson-and-birgit-mager-designed-a-movement
  2. Beucker, N. (2004). Research skills as basis for Industrial collaboration in design education. International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference,1–8,.Delft, The Netherlands. Bhamra, T., Lofthouse, V.,&Cooper,R.(Ed.)(2007).Designforsustainability:Apracticalapproach.(Design for Social Responsibility series). UK: Gower. Buchanan, R. (2001a). The problem of character in design education: Liberal arts and professional specialization. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011286205584
  3. Buchanan, R. (2001b). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues,17(4), 3–23.
  4. Burns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone, C.,&Winhall, J. (2006). RED PAPER 02:Transformation design. London: Design Council. Retrieved from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/red-paper-transformation-design.pdf
  5. Carroll, J. M. (1997). Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.61
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(3rd ed.). Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Davey, C.L., Wooton, A.B., Thomas, Cooper, R., & Press,
  7. M. (2005). Designfor surreal world a new model of socially responsible design. In International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Bremen, Germany.Definition of Industrial Design (n.d.). World Design Organisation. Retrieved April 10, 2020 from: https://wdo.org/about/definition/
  8. Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. Perigee Books.Fuad-Luke, A. (2009). Design activism: Beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world.London: Earthscan. Goedkoop, M., van Halen, C., te Riele, H., & Rommes, P. (1999).
  9. Product Services Systems, Ecological and Economic Basics, Report 1999/36. The Hague: VROM. Green, L. N., & Bonollo, E. (2003). Studio-based teaching: Hist