SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study

Osman Tayyar ÇELİK
Servet ATİK
Pages
539–564
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These syntheses point out the aspects that need to be focused on in the in the process of prospective teacher training program development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this meta-synthesis is to determine the findings of qualitative research on prospective teacher training in Turkey, the aspects of future prospective teacher training programs, and the deep knowledge and insights in them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fourteen studies dealing with new prospective teacher training program using qualitativemethods introduced in Turkey in 2016 were included in this meta-synthesis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These syntheses point out the aspects that need to be focused on in the in the process of prospective teacher training program development.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this meta-synthesis is to determine the findings of qualitative research on prospective teacher training in Turkey, the aspects of future prospective teacher training programs, and the deep knowledge and insights in them. Fourteen studies dealing with new prospective teacher training program using qualitativemethods introduced in Turkey in 2016 were included in this meta-synthesis. As a result of the analyses, four themes were revealed; mentoring, contribution of prospective teacher training to teacher education, activities, evaluation, and problems encountered in the execution of the program. Then, a second level abstraction was performed, and syntheses were made as follows; 1) mentor selection and workload, 2) professional development, 3) program content and planning, 4) school context, and 5) program accountability. These syntheses point out the aspects that need to be focused on in the in the process of prospective teacher training program development.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, O. T., ATİK, S. (2022). Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 539–564. https://ajindex.com/articles/496953

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akyıldız, S., Altun, T.ve Kasım, Ş. (2020). Adaylık eğitimi uygulama sürecinin aday öğretmenlerin görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6, 117-131.
  2. Altıntaş, S., & Görgen, İ. (2017). Teachers candidates' reviews on teacher candidate training system.Online Submission,12(6), 15-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.
  3. Alataş, H. (2017). The evaluation of “induction program” implementation in Turkey in 2016. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,
  4. Van. Aydın, İ. (2018). Teacher career cycles and teacher professional development. Journal of Human Sciences,15(4), 2047-2065. http://dx.doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v15i4.5450
  5. Bakioğlu, A.,Goğüş, N., Ulker, N.,Bayhan, G. veOzgen, B. (2015). Mentorluk ve eğitimde mentorluk”. A.Bakioğlu (Ed.), Eğitimde mentorluk (ss. 1-40).Ankara:
  6. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Balkar, B., & Şahin, S. (2015).Teacher ınduction programme as a new teacher training approach. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 11(1), 1-19.
  7. Bartlett, L., & Johnson, L. S. (2010). The evolution of new teacher induction policy: Support, specificity, and autonomy.Educational Policy,24(6), 847-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904809341466
  8. Bickmore, D. L., & Bickmore, S. T. (2010). A multifaceted approach to teacher induction.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(4), 1006-1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.043
  9. Blömeke, S., Hoth, J., Döhrmann, M., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2015). Teacher change during induction: Development of beginning primary teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and performance.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13(2), 287-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9619-4
  10. Bondas, T., & Hall, E. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.Qualitative Health Research,17(1), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306295879
  11. Cengiz, E. (2019). MilliEğitim Bakanlığı tarafından uygulanan aday öğretmen yetiştirme sürecine ilişkin yapılan çalışmaların analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 829-849.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Çakmak, Z., Kaçar, T., & Arıkan, I. (2017). The opinions of social studies candidate teachers about the process of candidate teacher training.The Journal of Academic Social Science,5(54), 576-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.12754
  13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we