Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 25

Virtual Education Trials and Evaluation Process in Architecture

Pages
302–315
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained in this study may improve architectural education concerning the virtual teaching experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The word ‘virtual,’ which the entire world has become familiar with during the pandemic in 2020, was a phrase that is primarily applicable for higher education in various departments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, for design students, the online learning medium is a new concept, and the question of how the virtual teaching environment affects the design capability of students is pertinent regarding architectural and design education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained in this study may improve architectural education concerning the virtual teaching experience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Architectural education · sustainable education · virtual education

Abstract

The word ‘virtual,’ which the entire world has become familiar with during the pandemic in 2020, was a phrase that is primarily applicable for higher education in various departments. However, for design students, the online learning medium is a new concept, and the question of how the virtual teaching environment affects the design capability of students is pertinent regarding architectural and design education. This study explores how architectural students’ perception of their education medium affects their success in organizational behavior. In this context, an in-depth online interview that aims to understand the perception of architectural students regarding their education medium was conducted to analyze the effects of the learning medium on their educational success. The findings obtained in this study may improve architectural education concerning the virtual teaching experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKTAY, H. E., KAVAS, K. R., BAKIR, İ., DANACI, H. M., UNVAN, M. (2022). Virtual Education Trials and Evaluation Process in Architecture. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 25, 302–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/496923

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bender, D. M., Vredevoogd, J. D., Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D. (2016). International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Using Online Education Technologies to Support Studio Instruction Computer Interaction: Exploring Design Synergies for more Effective Learning Published by: International Forum of Educational Techn. 9(4). Berge, Z. L., & Berge, M. B. (2019). The Economic ABC s of Educating and Training Generations X, Y, and Z. Performance Improvement, 58(5), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21864
  2. Broadfoot, O., & Bennett, R. (2003). Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios. Apple University Consortium Academic and Developers Conference Proceedings 2003, 9–21. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=E36FCCD1F9EB81E5B9D66D1014D59989?doi=10.1.1.124.3548&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  3. Chastain, T., & Elliott, A. (2000). Cultivating design competence: Online support for beginning design studio. Automation in Construction, 9(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00053-9
  4. Chen, W., & You, M. (2010). Student response to an internet-mediated industrial design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9068-2
  5. Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M. H. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9265-0
  6. George, B. H. (2018). Drawing online: A comparative analysis of an online basic graphics course. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.23 Gomez Zermeño, M. G. (2020). Massive Open Online Courses as a Digital Learning Strategy of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, N/A(N/A), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0311
  7. Kim, T., & Lim, J. (2019). Designing an Efficient Cloud Management Architecture for Sustainable Online Lifelong Education. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061523
  8. Mohr, K. A. J., & Mohr, E. S. (2017). Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 1(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.15142/T3M05T
  9. Newman, G., George, B., Li, D., Tao, Z., Yu, S., & Lee, R. J. (2018). Online learning in landscape architecture: Assessing issues, prefer