Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 27

An Analysis of the Seventh-Grade Science Textbook in Terms of Science, Engineering, and Entrepreneurship Applications

Pages
319–345
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the link between the curriculum and textbook should be improved in some units following the science assessment criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study is to analyse the secondary school 7th-grade science textbook in terms of science, engineering, and entrepreneurship applications, an area of practice emphasised in the curriculum restructured in 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research data source consists of 6 project design activities in the 7th-grade science textbook taught in the 2018-2019 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the link between the curriculum and textbook should be improved in some units following the science assessment criteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Science · engineering · and entrepreneurship (SEE) applications

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to analyse the secondary school 7th-grade science textbook in terms of science, engineering, and entrepreneurship applications, an area of practice emphasised in the curriculum restructured in 2018. For this purpose, the document analysis method, one of the qualitative research methods, was employed in the study. The research data source consists of 6 project design activities in the 7th-grade science textbook taught in the 2018-2019 academic year. The project design activities were analysed by content analysis. Analysis findings found coordination between the attainment of some curriculum units and the instructions in the textbook failed to be achieved. Deficiencies in terms of material, time, and cost according to science, engineering, and entrepreneurship evaluation criteria in the project design sections were also found. It was concluded that the link between the curriculum and textbook should be improved in some units following the science assessment criteria.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYACAN, K., ÖZLÜLECİ, M. (2022). An Analysis of the Seventh-Grade Science Textbook in Terms of Science, Engineering, and Entrepreneurship Applications. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 27, 319–345. https://ajindex.com/articles/496921

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anagun, S. S., & Atalay, N. (2017). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin girisimcilik becerisine iliskin yeterlik algilari. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 1(41), 298-313.
  2. Atici, A., Keskin Samancı, N., & Ozel, C. A. (2007). İlkogretim fen bilgisi ders kitaplarinin biyoloji konulari yonunden elestirel olarak incelenmesi ve ogretmen gorusleri. Turk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 115-131.
  3. Bahar, M., Yener, D., Yilmaz M., & Emen, H., Gurer, F. (2018). 2018 Fen bilimleri ogretim programi kazanimlarindaki degisimler ve fen teknoloji matematik muhendislik (STEM) entegrasyonu. Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 18 (2), 702-735.
  4. Bostan-Sarioglan, A., Can, Y., & Gedik, I. (2016). 6. sinif fen bilimleri ders kitabindaki etkinliklerin arastirma-sorgulamaya dayali ogrenme yaklasimina uygunlugunun degerlendirilmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 16 (3), 1004-1025.
  5. Buyukozturk, S., Kilic Cakmak, E., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri (24. baski). Pegem Yayincilik. Cansoy, R. (2018). Uluslararasi cercevelere gore 21. yuzyil becerileri ve egitim sisteminde kazandirilmasi. Insan ve Toplum Bilimleri Arastirmalari Dergisi, 7(4), 3112-3134.
  6. Ceger, B., & Aydogdu, C. (2017). Besinci sinif fen bilimleri kitabinin laboratuvar guvenligi, kazanimlar ve bilimsel surec becerileri acisindan incelenmesi. Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi Turk Dunyasi Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi (ESTUDAM) Egitim Dergisi, 2(2), 12-34.
  7. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner L. A. (2015). Nitel ve karma yontem arastirmalari. (Cev. M. Sever). Ani yayincilik.( Publication date of original book:2011).
  8. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (second ed.). Sage. Demirkazan, Y. K., Kalik, G., & Ocal, K. (2018). 7. Sinif fen bilimleri ders kitabi. MEB Yayinlari. Deveci, İ. (2018). Turkiye’de 2013 ve 2018 yili fen bilimleri dersi ogretim programlarinin temel ogeler acisindan karsilastirilmasi. Mersin Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14(2), 799-825.
  9. DeVore-Wedding, B. (2016). Enhancing science instruction and learning through reading and writing strategies. NSTA Reports, 27(5), 3. Eke, C. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi ogretim programindaki kazanimlarin Webb’in bilgi derinligi seviyelerine gore analizi. Sosyal Arastirmalar ve Davranis Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(6), 17. Ercan, S., & Sahin, F. (2015). Fen egitiminde muhendislik uygulamalarinin kull