Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 27

How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?

Pages
346–373
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained in this study suggest that in order for the gifted student resource room to be efficient, it should be implemented in coordination with classroom teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present research aims to determine the problems encountered during the integration of a resource room for gifted students in a primary school system and examining the measures developed for dealing with these problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Structured as an action research, this research project was conducted in a primary school in the Eskisehir province of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained in this study suggest that in order for the gifted student resource room to be efficient, it should be implemented in coordination with classroom teachers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gifted students · resource room · action research

Abstract

The present research aims to determine the problems encountered during the integration of a resource room for gifted students in a primary school system and examining the measures developed for dealing with these problems. Structured as an action research, this research project was conducted in a primary school in the Eskisehir province of Turkey. Participants in this research consisted of the school headmaster, the teacher of the resource room, gifted students attending the resource room, parents of gifted students and classroom teachers whose students attended the resource room, researchers and the members of the evaluation board. Data were collected using interviews, meeting reports, documents and the researcher's diary. The research data were analyzed using the systematic analysis approach. The findings of this research showed that the resource room were generally positively perceived; however, several problems were observed as the programme was carried out during regular class hours. The findings obtained in this study suggest that in order for the gifted student resource room to be efficient, it should be implemented in coordination with classroom teachers.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖPENGİN, E., GÜRGÜR, H. (2022). How should a Resource Room Programme for Gifted Students be Integrated into School System?. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 27, 346–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/496912

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aldrich, P. W., & Mills, C. J. (1989). A special program for highly able rural youth in grades five and six. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(1), 11-14.
  2. Alloway, T. P., & Elsworth, M. (2012). An investigation of cognitive skills and behavior in high ability students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 891-895. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.02.001
  3. Archambault, F. X, Jr, Westberg, K. L., Brown, S., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut. Bedur, S., Bilgic, N., & Taslidere, E. (2015). Ozel (ustun) yetenekli ogrencilere sunulan destek egitim hizmetlerinin degerlendirilmesi. Hasan Ali Yucel Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 12(23), 221-242.
  4. Belcastro, F. (1987). Elementary pull-out programs for the intellectually gifted--boon or bane? Roeper Review, 9, 208-212.
  5. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Borland, J. H. (2013). Problematizing gifted education. Callahan, C. M., Hertberg-Davis, H. L. (Editorler.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives icinde (s. 176-188).
  6. New York, NY: Routledge. Brighton, C.M.,& Wiley, K. (2013). Analyzing pull-out programs: A framework for planning. Callahan, C. M., Hertberg-Davis, H. L. (Editorler.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives icinde (s. 188-198).
  7. New York, NY: Routledge Calero, M. D., Belen, G.-M. M. and Robles, M. A. (2011). Learning potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 176-181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.025
  8. Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Oh, S. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215
  9. Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Oh, S., Azano, A. P., & Hailey, E. P. (2015). What Works in gifted education: Documenting effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 1–31. doi:10.3102/0002831214549448 Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. A. (1998). Comparing Separate Class and Pull-out Programs for the Gifted. The Annual Meeting of the Ame