Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 28

A Phenomenological Study on theAntecedents and Consequences ofOrganizational Ostracism

Pages
331–350
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings showedthat organizational ostracism harms organizational and individual performance.The research results show that ostracism is an important organizational behaviorproblem that disrupts organizational and individual health and job satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizational environments are environments where conflicts ofinterest are intense due to business and human interactions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study data were collected through in-depth interviews from 19faculty members with different titles and positions working in various departmentsof public universities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings showedthat organizational ostracism harms organizational and individual performance.The research results show that ostracism is an important organizational behaviorproblem that disrupts organizational and individual health and job satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Organizational environments are environments where conflicts ofinterest are intense due to business and human interactions. Various problems areexperienced in these environments due to both business and human interactionand interpersonal relations. These problems cause various psychological andphysical health problems in the employees and organizational health problemssuch as reduced job satisfaction and damage to work peace in organizations. Thisstudy examined the problem of "organizational ostracism," an example of negativebehavior in organizations. The study discussed the causes of ostracism and itseffects on the ostracized person. The study was designed according to thedescriptive phenomenological pattern, one of the qualitative research designs. Thesample of the study was determined according to the purposeful samplingtechnique. The study data were collected through in-depth interviews from 19faculty members with different titles and positions working in various departmentsof public universities. The research results were presented and interpreted as"code," "sub-theme," and "main theme." At the end of the examination,organizational exclusion; It was understood that it was caused by jealousy, ethnic,political and trade union discrimination. The impact of organizational ostracismon the individual excluded; intention to quit, feeling of burnout, andpsychosomatic disorders were grouped under the main themes. Findings showedthat organizational ostracism harms organizational and individual performance.The research results show that ostracism is an important organizational behaviorproblem that disrupts organizational and individual health and job satisfaction.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, S., BAŞPINAR, N. Ö., TUTAR, H. (2022). A Phenomenological Study on theAntecedents and Consequences ofOrganizational Ostracism. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 28, 331–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/496897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abasli, K. (2018). Örgütsel dışlanma, işe yabancılaşma ve örgütsel sinizm ilişkisine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri (Doktora tezi). Hacettepe Universitesi. http://www.openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11655/5264
  2. Adaman, F., & Keyder, C. (2006). Türkiye'de büyük kentlerin gecekondu ve çöküntü mahallelerinde yaşanan yoksulluk ve sosyal dışlanma. Avrupa Komisyonu Raporu. https://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_inclusion/docs/2006/study_turkey_tr.pdf
  3. Birch, D. A. (1998). Identifying sources of social support. The Journal of School Health, 68(4), 159-161. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1998.tb06335.x. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: Introduction and methods. Allyn and Bacon. Bryman, A. (2004). Quantity and quality in social research. Routledge. Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 359-380).
  4. Sage. Chen, Z., Dewall, C. N., Poon, K.T., & Chen, E.W. (2012). When destiny hurts: implicit theories of relationships moderate aggressive responses to ostracis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1029-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.002
  5. Chung, Y. W. (2015). The mediating effects of organizational conflict on the relationships between workplace ostracism with in-role behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(4), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-01-2014- 0001 Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). Routledge. Cozby, C. P. (1989). Methods in behavioral research (4th Ed.). Mayfield. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Research design. Qualitative and quantitative approach. Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2012).
  6. Educational research. Pearson. Celik, C., & Kosar, A. (2015). Örgüt kültürü ve işyerinde dışlanma arasındaki ilişki: Mersin Üniversitesi çalışanları üzerinde bir uygulama. C. Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(2), 47-62.
  7. Eickholt, M. S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2017). Investment model predictions of workplace ostracism on k–12 teachers' commitment to their schools and the profession of teaching. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 32(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2017.1332483
  8. Erdemli, O., & Kurum, G. (2019). Okul yöneticisi ve öğretmenlerin gözünden okulda dışlanma: Nedenleri ve sonuçları. Hac