SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 25

Vital Problems of Primary and Secondary Schools and Solution Suggestions: A Qualitative Analysis Based on the Opinions of School Administrators

Gülay ASLAN
Pages
198–234
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended that the Ministry of National Education pays attention to the voices coming from the schools, reestablish the balance of authority responsibility, switch to school-based budgeting, and allocate funds to each school.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Based on the opinions of school administrators, this study aimed to identify the vital problems of primary and secondary schools and suggest solutions to these problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 35 school administrators working in primary and secondary schools in Tokat province in the 2016-2017 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended that the Ministry of National Education pays attention to the voices coming from the schools, reestablish the balance of authority responsibility, switch to school-based budgeting, and allocate funds to each school.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Primary school · Secondary school · Problems of schools

Abstract

Based on the opinions of school administrators, this study aimed to identify the vital problems of primary and secondary schools and suggest solutions to these problems. It was designed with a multiple case study method from qualitative research approaches. The study group consisted of 35 school administrators working in primary and secondary schools in Tokat province in the 2016-2017 academic year. The data were collected by interview technique. During the interviews, demographic information about school administrators as well as information on the problems of schools were collected. The data were analyzed by content analysis technique. In data collection, processing, and analysis processes, measures to increase validity and reliability were taken. In the research, 38 problems were identified under five themes related to the problems experienced in primary and secondary schools. Twelve of these problems were found to be of “vital” importance. The first three of the vital problems of the schools in the study group were 'lack of funding for schools', 'insufficient physical infrastructure of schools', and 'parents lack of interest in school'. It is recommended that the Ministry of National Education pays attention to the voices coming from the schools, reestablish the balance of authority responsibility, switch to school-based budgeting, and allocate funds to each school.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, G. (2022). Vital Problems of Primary and Secondary Schools and Solution Suggestions: A Qualitative Analysis Based on the Opinions of School Administrators. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2021 - Sayı: 25, 198–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/496889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Âdem, M. (1993). Ulusal eğitim politikamız ve finansmanı. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları No:172. Akbaba, A. ve Turhan, M. (2016). İlköğretim okul binalarının fiziksel sorunlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi (Van il örneği). KTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(12), 341-357.
  2. Akça, F. ve Yaman, B. (2009). Okul yöneticilerinin problem çözme davranışlarını etkileyen faktörleri incelemeye yönelik bir çalışma. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(3), 767-780.
  3. Akçamete, G., Kaner, S. ve Sucuoğlu, B. (2001). Öğretmenlerde tükenmişlik, iş doyumu ve kişilik. Ankara:
  4. Nobel Yayınları.
  5. Aksoy, S. U. (2007) Eskişehir ili özel eğitim kurumlarında çalışan öğretmenlerin tükenmişlik düzeylerin değerlendirilmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi,
  6. Eskişehir. Aktan, C. C. (2012). Organizasyonlarda toplam kalite yönetimi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 235-262.
  7. Aktaş, H. İ. (2018).Türk eğitim sisteminin sorunlarının incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gaziantep Üniversitesi,
  8. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gaziantep. Akyol, C., Sungur, S. ve Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students’ science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16 (1), 1-21.
  9. Alomar, B. O. (2006). Personel and family paths to pupil achievement. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(8), 907–922.
  10. Althusser, L. (2006). İdeoloji ve devletin ideolojik aygıtları. İstanbul:
  11. İthaki Yayınları.
  12. Anderson, J. A. (2005). Accountability in education. International Acedemy of Education. 12 Nisan 2020 tarihinde https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140986 adresinden erişildi. Ansal, H. (1997). Bilim, bilim politikası ve üniversiteler (E. Akalın, H. Aydoğdu ve R. Saraoğlu, Yay. Haz.). Bilim ve emek süreci içinde (s. 187-193). İstanbul:
  13. Bağlam Yayıncılık. Apple, M. W. (2004). Neoliberalizim ve eğitim politikaları üzerine eleştirel yazılar (F. Gök, çev. ed.). Ankara:
  14. Eğitim Sen Yayınları.
  15. Apple, M. W. ve Beane J. A. (2011). Demokratik okullar (M. Sarı, çev.). Ankara:
  16. Dipnot yayınları. Arslan, G. ve Aslan, G. (2014). Eğitim hakkı bağlamında zihin engelli bireylere eğitim veren öğretmenlerin tükenmişlik düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi (Tokat ili örneği). Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2),49-66. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.42.4
  17. Aslan, G. (2015). An analysis regarding the equality perceptions of educational administrators. The