SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 2022 - Sayı: 30

The Antecedents and Outcomes of Job Stress Experienced by School Administrators and Strategies for Coping with Stress*

Serkan YUKSEL
Mustafa OZGENEL
Pages
26–46
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the qualitative interviews, it was found that the antecedents that cause most stress among school administrators are "responsibility" and "difficulty with colleagues, loneliness".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the antecedents, consequences, and coping strategies of job stress among school administrators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Interviews were conducted with 19 administrators using a semi-structured interview form to collect qualitative data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the qualitative interviews, it was found that the antecedents that cause most stress among school administrators are "responsibility" and "difficulty with colleagues, loneliness".
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to determine the antecedents, consequences, and coping strategies of job stress among school administrators. A exploratory sequential design was used in the study. Interviews were conducted with 19 administrators using a semi-structured interview form to collect qualitative data. Quantitative data was collected using the Marmara Job Stress Scale. The scale was applied to 439 school administrators, and a t-test was used to determine if there were significant differences in the antecedents, consequences, and coping strategies of job stress. As a result of the qualitative interviews, it was found that the antecedents that cause most stress among school administrators are "responsibility" and "difficulty with colleagues, loneliness". As a result of the qualitative interviews, it was found that as a result of job stress, the administrators "do not have time for their families" and "are offensive to the business environment". According to qualitative data, school administrators were found to use individual coping strategies to manage job stress. The qualitative and quantitative results were interpreted together at the end of the study. As a result of the research, it is suggested that educational environments and legislation should be regulated according to the antecedents of work stress, which have a high effect on school administrators.

🔖

Cite This Article

YUKSEL, S., OZGENEL, M. (2022). The Antecedents and Outcomes of Job Stress Experienced by School Administrators and Strategies for Coping with Stress*. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2022 - Sayı: 30, 26–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/496884

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acar, M. (2019). Okul yoneticilerinin is tatmini duygusal emek ve is stresi arasındaki iliski: Konya ili uzerine bir arastırma [Yayınlanmamıs yuksek lisans tezi]. Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi, Konya. Akca, İ. & Beydilli, E. T. (2018). İs stresi ve yaratıcılık sureci iliskisi: Kutahya’daki mutfak calısanları uzerine bir arastırma. Guncel Turizm Arastırmaları Dergisi, 2(Ek.1), 283-307.
  2. Akdemir, A., Girgin, S. & Girgin, U. (2021). İlkokul mudurlerinin is stresi hakkındaki goruslerinin incelenmesi. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (58), 363-382.
  3. Akpınar, B. (2008). Egitim surecinde ogretmenlerde strese yol acan nedenlere yonelik ogretmen gorusleri. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 16(2), 359-366.
  4. Aksoy, A. & Kutluca, F. (2010). Calısma hayatında stres kaynakları, stres belirtileri ve stres sonuclarının incelenmesi uzerine bir arastırma. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, (49), 457-486.
  5. Arıcan, K. (2011). Orgutsel stres kaynakları: Kavramsal bir cozumleme. Egitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 2(4), 55-76.
  6. Aydin, I. (2016).
  7. İs yasamında stres. Pegem. Aydin, S. (2004). Orgutsel stres yonetimi. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 6(3), 49-74.
  8. Baki, A. & Gokcek, T. (2012). Karma yontem arastırmalarına genel bir bakıs. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(42), 1-21.
  9. Baydar, F. & Çetin, M. (2021). The model of relationships between intellectual capital, learning organizations, and innovation-oriented organizational structures in educational organizations. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 94, 265-294.
  10. Beehr, T. A. & Newman J. E. (1978). Job stress, employee health, and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysisi, model, and literatura rewiew. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 665-699.
  11. Bildirici, S. (2020). Okul etkililigini isten ayrılma niyeti uzerine etkisinde paylasılan liderligin aracılık rolu [Yayınlanmamıs yuksek lisans tezi]. Gaziantep Universitesi, Gaziantep. Borg, M. G. (1990). Occupational stress in British educational settings: A review. Educational Psychology, 10(2), 103-126.
  12. Borg, M. G. & Riding, R. J. (1993). Occupational stress and job satisfaction among school administrators. Journal of Education Administration, 31(1), 4-21.
  13. Bowers, T. (2004). Stress, teaching and teacher healt. Education, 32(3), 73-80.
  14. Bursalioglu, Z. (2019). Okul yonetiminde yeni yapı ve davranıs. Pegem. Can, N. (2008). Okul yoneticilerinin yonetimde cinsiyet faktorune iliskin gorusleri. Egitim ve Bilim, 33(147), 35- 41. Cengiz, E. & Aslan, Z. (2015).