Through which some specific challenges and opportunities have been addressed to enhance the quality of life, spatial and environmental attributes, and also to formulate some design guidelines or proposals.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Major pedestrian and vehicle shared road named 'Sevgi Yolu', that provides easy access between the eastern and the western parts of Ege University Campus, has been examined within the context of visual (impact) assessment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Major pedestrian and vehicle shared road named 'Sevgi Yolu', that provides easy access between the eastern and the western parts of Ege University Campus, has been examined within the context of visual (impact) assessment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through which some specific challenges and opportunities have been addressed to enhance the quality of life, spatial and environmental attributes, and also to formulate some design guidelines or proposals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Major pedestrian and vehicle shared road named 'Sevgi Yolu', that provides easy access between the eastern and the western parts of Ege University Campus, has been examined within the context of visual (impact) assessment. Through which some specific challenges and opportunities have been addressed to enhance the quality of life, spatial and environmental attributes, and also to formulate some design guidelines or proposals.
Özet
Ege Üniversitesinin doğu ve batı bölümlerini birbirine bağlayan araç ve yaya paylaşımlı yol (Sevgi Yolu) görsel (etki) değerlendirme kapsamında ele alınmıştır. Bu sayede temel sorunlar ve olanaklar yaşam kalitesini, mekansal ve çevresel nitelikleri arttırma ve tasarım rehberleri oluşturma yolunda kullanılmıştır.
🔖
Cite This Article
KAPLAN, A., HEPCAN, C. Ç. (2022). A study on visual (Impact) assessment of 'Sevgi Yolu' in Ege Univ. Campus. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 159–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/496570
Anonymous, 2002, Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. Institute of Environmental Assessment and The Landscape Institute, E&FN Spon, London, 166 pp. Kaplan, A., E. Küçükerbaş, B. Özkan, 1999, Foça Kentsel Yerleşiminde Görsel Etki Değerlendirmesi Üzerine Araştırmalar. Ege Üniversitesi Araştırma Fonu Projesi (Proje No: 96-ZRF-009), İzmir, 112 sy. Kaplan, A., Ş. Hepcan, E. Küçükerbaş, B. Özkan, 2001. Kuşadası Kent Merkezine Yönelik Bir Görsel Analiz Çalışması. Geçmişten Geleceğe Kuşadası Sempozyumu, 23-26 Şubat 2000,
Pullar, V.D., E.M. Tidey, 2001. Coupling 3D Visualisation to Qualitative Assessment of Built Environment Design. Landscape and Urban Planning 55(2001), 29-40
Smardon, R.C., T. Costello, H. Eggink, 1986. Urban Visual Description and Analysis. Pages 115-135, in Foundations for Visual Project Analysis. R.C. Smardon, J.F. Palmer, J.P. Felleman (Editors), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 374 pp. Yürekli, F., 1977. Çevre Görsel Değerlendirmesine İlişkin Bir Yöntem Araştırması. Doktora Tezi (Yayınlanmamış), İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi, İstanbul, 117 sy.