Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Ekmeklik buğdaylarda bayrak yaprak uzunluğu, genişliği, alanı ve bitki başına tane verimi özelliklerinin diallel analiz yöntemi ile kombinasyon yeteneklerinin tahmini

Predicting of combining ability for length, width and area of flag leaf and grain yield per plant in bread wheat with respect to diallel analysis

Pages
21–31
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data were examined by Griffing diallel analyses method.The effects of general combining ability (gca) were significant for all the traits except grain yield per plant, while the specific combining ability (sca) effects were significant for all the traits (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Combining ability for width, length and area of flag leaf and grain yield per plant components was studied in an eight-parent diallel cross in bread wheat.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Combining ability for width, length and area of flag leaf and grain yield per plant components was studied in an eight-parent diallel cross in bread wheat.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data were examined by Griffing diallel analyses method.The effects of general combining ability (gca) were significant for all the traits except grain yield per plant, while the specific combining ability (sca) effects were significant for all the traits (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Combining ability for width, length and area of flag leaf and grain yield per plant components was studied in an eight-parent diallel cross in bread wheat. Data were examined by Griffing diallel analyses method.The effects of general combining ability (gca) were significant for all the traits except grain yield per plant, while the specific combining ability (sca) effects were significant for all the traits (P

Özet

Ekmeklik buğdaylarda sekiz ebeveynde diallel melezleme yoluyla bayrak yaprak uzunluğu, genişliği, alanı ve bitki başına tane verimi özellikleri için kombinasyon yetenekleri incelenmiştir.Genel kombinasyon etkileri bitki başına dane verimi dışında diğer özellikler için istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunurken, özel kombinasyon etkileri incelenen tüm özellikler için önemli bulunmuştur (P

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, M. B., DERE, Ş. (2022). Ekmeklik buğdaylarda bayrak yaprak uzunluğu, genişliği, alanı ve bitki başına tane verimi özelliklerinin diallel analiz yöntemi ile kombinasyon yeteneklerinin tahmini. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 21–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/496551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anonymous. 2004.
  2. Republic of Turkey, Prime Ministry State Institute of Statistics. http://www.die.gov.tr/yillik/yillik_2004_eng.pdf. Acces: January 2006. Anonymous, 2005. Production Estimates and Crop Assessment Division Foreign Agricultural Service. http://www.fas.usda.gov/pecad/highlights/2005/07/ durum2005/durum%20tables.html Acces: February 2006.
  3. Bariga, P.1980. Inheritance of photosynthetic areas above the flag leaf node in spring wheat. Plant Breeding Abstracts 50, 2712. Brow, M. D and J. G. Coors. 1994. Diallel: A Microcomputer program for the simulation and analysis of diallel crosses. Agron.J.,86 (1): 154-159.
  4. Brown, C.N. and R.O. Weibel, R.D. Seif. 1996. Heterosis and combining ability in common winter wheat, Crop. Sci. 6:392-383.
  5. Cruz, C.D. and -Vencovsky,R.1989. Compparocao de algunsmetodos de analise dialelica. Rev. Bras Genet 12:425-438. Gardner,C.O., S.A. Eberhart. 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety Cross Diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22: 439-452. Gardner,C.O.1967. Simplified methods for estimating constants and computing sums of squares for a diallel cross analysis. Fitotec Latinoam 4:1-12.
  6. Griffing, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust.J. Biol. Sci.9:463-493.
  7. Hayman, B.I. 1954 a. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses,Genetics, 39:789-809.
  8. Hayman, B.I. 1958.The theory and analysis of diallel croses.II.Genetics 43:63-65.
  9. Ibrahim, H.A. and R.A. Elenein. 1977. The relative contribution of different wheat leaves and awns to the grain yield and its protein content. Z. Ack. Pflanz 144: 1-7.
  10. Jinks, J.L., B.I. Hayman. 1953. The Analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Crop Newslett 27:48-54.
  11. Kashif, M., Khaliq. 2004. Manifestation of Heterosis for Some Metric Characters in Intraspecific crosses of Triticum aestivum L. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. Vol.6, No.1p.132-137.
  12. Kempthorne, O., R.N. Curnow. 1961. The Partial diallel cross. Biometrics. P.229-250.
  13. Kılınç, M., 2001. The determination of combining ability of some agricultural characters at wheat breads. Mustafa Kemal University, The journal of Faculty of Agriculture 6 (1-2):51-60.
  14. Hatay. Li, L.Z., D.B. Lu.,D and Q. Cui. 1991. Study on the combining ability for yield and quality characters in winter wheat. Plant Breding Abst.(1994), 3:1. Lupton, F.G.H. 1973. Selection criteria determining yield in semi dwarf wheat varieties. Ann. Appl.Biol. 72: 47-50. In: Sharma, SN., R.S. Sain and