Journals / Selçuk İletişim / 2015 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

-

İLETİŞİM İŞLEVLERİ SORMACASI'NIN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU İÇİN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Pages
5–31
Publication Date
2015-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the Turkish Version of the CFQ is found to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure communication functions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to adapt the Communication Functions Questionnaire (CFQ) develop by Burleson and Samter (1990) to Turkish and to perform validity and reliability analyses of the scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CFQ was applied to 193 college of communication students from a University located in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the Turkish Version of the CFQ is found to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure communication functions
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İletişim işlevleri · geçerlik · güvenirlik

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to adapt the Communication Functions Questionnaire (CFQ) develop by Burleson and Samter (1990) to Turkish and to perform validity and reliability analyses of the scale. The CFQ was applied to 193 college of communication students from a University located in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. The CFQ consists of 10 subscales including comforting skills, conflict management, conversational skills, ego supportive skills, expressiveness, referential skills, listening, narrative skills, persuasion and regulation. The CFQ are also two secondary factors termed affectively oriented skills and instrumental oriented skills. Back translation technique was used to adopt the CFQ into Turkish. After finalizing language (translation) and cultural adaptation process, validity and reliability analyses were conducted. Results from exploratory and two step-confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the original form of CFQ and its Turkish version were consistent in terms of hypothesized structure. Internal consistency coefficients varied between .75 and .89 for the 10 factor structure and varied between .87 and .90 for the second order model. In conclusion, the Turkish Version of the CFQ is found to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure communication functions

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı Burleson ve Samter (1990) tarafından geliştirilen İletişim İşlevleri Sormacası'nı (İİS) Türkçeye uyarlamak ve sormacanın geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerini gerçekleştirmektir. Araştırmaya Orta Anadolu'da bir üniversitenin İletişim Fakültesi'nde öğrenim gören 193 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. İİS; rahatlama, çatışmaları yönetme/çözümleme, sohbet etme, benlik desteği verme, ifade etme, bilgi verme, dinleme, anlatım, ikna etme ve düzenleme becerileri olmak üzere 10 alt boyut içermektedir. Ayrıca söz konusu alt boyutlar duyuşsal yönelimli ve enstrümental yönelimli olmak üzere iki üst boyutta toplanmıştır.İİS'nin Türkçeye uyumlaştırılması geri çeviri tekniğiyle yapılmıştır. Dilsel ve kültürel uyumlaştırılma yapıldıktan sonra geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi ve iki aşamalı doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri sonuçları sormacanın orijinal formla tutarlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Sormacanın iç tutarlılık katsayıları 10 faktörlü birinci düzey modelde 0,75 ile 0,89, ikinci düzey faktöriyel modelde ise 0,87 ile 0,90 arasında bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlara göre İİS'nin Türkçe Formu, iletişim işlevlerinin ölçülmesinde kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme araçtır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUMTEPE, E., KÜÇÜK, M. (2015). -. Selçuk İletişim, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 5–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/49655

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akkuzu N ve Akkaya N (2014) Development and Validity-Reliability Study Of Communication Skills Scale for Student Teachers: Suggestion of An Alternative Model, Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9/8, 111-132.
  2. Argon T ve Zafer D (2009) İlköğretim Okulu Yöneticilerinin İletişim Sürecinde Yaşadıkları Problemler (Nitel Bir Çalışma), The Journal of SAU Education Faculty, 18, 99-123.
  3. Aylor B (2003)
  4. The Impact Of Sex, Gender And Cognitive Complexity On The Perceived Importance Of Teacher Communication Skills, Communication Stud- ies, 54, 496-509.
  5. Baringer D and McCroskey J (2000) Immediacy in The Classroom: Student Im- mediacy, Communication Education, 49, 179-186.
  6. Basaran M ve Erdem I (2009) Öğretmen Adaylarının Güzel Konuşma Becerisi İle İlgili Görüşleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(3), 743-754.
  7. Burleson B R, Kunkel A W, Samter W and Werking K (1996) Men’s and Women’s Evaluations Of Communication Skills in Personal Relationships: When Sex Differences Make A Difference—And When They Don’t, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 201-224.
  8. Burleson B R and Mortenson S R (2003) Explaining Cultural Differences in Evaluations Of Emotional Support Behaviors: Exploring The Mediating Influences Of Value Systems and Interaction Goals, Communication Research, 30, 113–146.
  9. Burleson B and Samter W (1990) Effects Of Cognitive Complexity On The Perceived Importance Communication Skills in Friends, Communication Reseach, 17, 165-182.
  10. Burleson B, Samter W and Lucchetti A E (1992) Similarity in Communication Values As A Predictor Of Friendship Choices: Studies Of Friends and Best Friends, Southern Communication Journal, 57, 260-276.
  11. Çetinkanat C (1997)
  12. Öğretmenlerin İletişim Becerileri, Paper presented at the 3th International Elementary Teaching Semposium, Adana-Turkey: Çukurova University. Field A P (2013) Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics: And Sex And Drugs And Rock 'N' Roll (4th Ed.), Sage, London. Finn A and Powers W G (2002) The Value Of Instrumental and Affective Communication Skills in Different Relational Stages, Communication Quarterly, 50, 192-203.
  13. Frymier A B and Houser M L (2000) The Teacher-Student Relationship As An Interpersonal Relationship, Communication Education, 49, 207-219.
  14. Frymier A and Weser B (2001) The Role Of Student Predispositions On Student Expectations For Instructor Communication Behavior, Communication Educa- tion, 50, 314-326. H