SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Türkiye de KÖYMER Tarımsal Yayım Projesinden Çıkarılan Dersler

Lessons Learnt from KOYMER Agricultural Extension Project in Turkey

Murat BOYACI
Özlem YILDIZ
Pages
61–66
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But, the plannedfinancial contributions of farmers and sustainability of the model predicted hadnot provided in the project.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The reducing role of public in economy had encouraged the privatealternatives in technology transfer, and also cost-sharing structures inagricultural extension services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, KOYMER Project, which was aimed atdecentralization, cost sharing and creating a pluralistic structure in Turkishagricultural extension system, had been examined by interviewing with 566consultants (advisors) in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But, the plannedfinancial contributions of farmers and sustainability of the model predicted hadnot provided in the project.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The reducing role of public in economy had encouraged the privatealternatives in technology transfer, and also cost-sharing structures inagricultural extension services. The structural changes vary according to thecountry conditions. In this study, KOYMER Project, which was aimed atdecentralization, cost sharing and creating a pluralistic structure in Turkishagricultural extension system, had been examined by interviewing with 566consultants (advisors) in Turkey. Some information on personal characteristics,activities and problems have been gathered through the questionnaires. Theproject had positive effects on extension workers farmers ratios, behavioralchanges in technical and socio-cultural issues in rural areas. But, the plannedfinancial contributions of farmers and sustainability of the model predicted hadnot provided in the project.

Özet

Kamunun ekonomideki rolünün azalması, teknoloji transferinde özelalternatifler ve tarımsal yayım hizmetlerinde maliyet paylaşımını teşviketmiştir. Yapısal değişiklikler ülkelerin koşullarına göre farklılık göstermektedir.Bu çalışmada, Türk tarımsal yayım sisteminde yerelleşme, maliyet paylaşımı veçoğulcu yapıyı oluşturmayı amaçlayan KÖYMER Projesi, Türkiye de 566 danışmanile görüşülerek incelenmiştir. Kişisel özellikler, faaliyetler ve sorunlarla ilgili bazıbilgiler anket yoluyla derlenmiştir. Projenin kırsal alanda, yayımcı-çiftçi oranına,bazı teknik ve sosyokültürel konularda davranış değişikliğine pozitif etkileriolmuştur. Ancak, projede, çiftçilerin planlanan finansal katkıları ve öngörülenmodelin sürdürülebilirliği sağlanamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYACI, M., YILDIZ, Ö. (2022). Türkiye de KÖYMER Tarımsal Yayım Projesinden Çıkarılan Dersler. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 61–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/496490

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Anderson, J. R., Feder, G., 2003,
  2. Rural Extension Services, Worldbank Policy Research Working Paper 2976, 33 p. Axinn, G., 1988, Guide on Alternative Extension Approaches, FAO, Rome, Italy, 148p. Celik Ates, H., and Z. Gokce Cakal, 2014, Views of Extension Personnel on Extension Methods and Transition to Private Extension: The Case of Isparta Province, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, Vol:16 Supplementary Issue, 1529- 1541pp. DPT, 2000, Tarimsal Politikalar ve Yapisal Duzenlemeler Ozel Ihtisas Komisyonu Raporu, DPT Sekizinci Bes Yillik Kalkinma Plani, DPT: 2516, OIK:534, Ankara 2000, 61s. Feder, G.,Willet, A., Zijp, W., 1999, Agricultural Extension Generic Challenges and Some Ingredients for Solutions, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2129, Springer US, 313- 353pp. Marcotte, P.,1988, Organizational behavior factors: a brief synopsis of leadership motivation and conflict management, Human Resource Management in National Agricultural Research: Report of a Workshop, ISNAR, The Netherlands, 168-182pp. Rivera, W. M., Qamar, M. K., Van Crowder, L, 2001, Agricultural and Rural Extension Worldwide: Options for Institutional Reform in the Developing Countries, Extension, Education and Communication Services, FAO, Rome, Italy, 49pp. Sigman, A., Swanson, B.E., 1993, Utilization of technology: the corner stone of agricultural development policy and programs, Agricultural Extension a Reference Manual, Second Edition,
  3. FAO, Rome, Italy. 227-231pp. Swanson B.E., Farner, B.J., Bahal, R., 1989, The current status of extension worldwide, Global Consultation on Agricultural Extension, FAO, Rome, Italy, 43-76pp. Swanson, B. E., Rajalahti, R. (2010). Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems, The World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper:45, Washington, DC. TEDGEM, 2007, http://www.tedgem.gov.tr/koymer.htm TEDGEM, 2009, http://www.tedgem.gov.tr/koymer.htm, access: 01.09.2009. TKB,2009,http://www.ordutarim.gov.tr/subeleler/cey/mevzuat/koymer. htm, access: 01.09.2009. TZOB, http://www.tzob.org.tr/tzob/tzob_ana_sayfa.htm ZMO, 2005, Proje Kapsamında Çalış an Ziraat Mühendisleri Kaderleriyle Baş Baş a Kaldı, Tarım ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Sayı:75, Sayfa:42. TUIK, 2014, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, access:14.12.2014