Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Toprak Yüzeyine Uygulanan Zeytin Atığı Uygulamasının Yapay Yağmurlayıcı Koşulları Altında Yüzey kış ve Toprak Kaybı Üzerine Etkileri

Effects of Olive Mill Waste Applications on Runoff and Soil Losses under Artificial Rainfall Conditions

Pages
125–129
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was obtained that addition ofolive mill wastes even with a rate of 25% was effective surface cover forreducing runoff and soil losses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil, one of the most important natural resources is, lost by water and winderosion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, loam, sandy loam, loamy sand andclay loam soil samples, passed thought 8 mm sieve were placed into erosionpans with a size of sized as 30x45x15 cm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was obtained that addition ofolive mill wastes even with a rate of 25% was effective surface cover forreducing runoff and soil losses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Soil, one of the most important natural resources is, lost by water and winderosion. Addition of organic materials into the soils is commonly used forreducing soil and water losses. In this study, loam, sandy loam, loamy sand andclay loam soil samples, passed thought 8 mm sieve were placed into erosionpans with a size of sized as 30x45x15 cm. Olive mill waste was applied to soilwithin the erosion pans at 4 different covering ratios (0, 25, 50, and 100%). Anartificial rainfall with intensity of 40 mm h-1was applied. After artificial rainfallapplications, runoff and soil losses were calculated. The results clearly indicatedthat runoff and soil losses from the erosion pans decreased significantly byincreasing rate of olive mill waste coverage. It was obtained that addition ofolive mill wastes even with a rate of 25% was effective surface cover forreducing runoff and soil losses.

Özet

En önemli doğal kaynaklarımızdan olan topraklarımız, su ve rüzgâr erozyonuile kaybolmaktadır. Toprak kayıplarını azaltmak için topraklara çeşitli organikmateryaller ilave edilmektedir. Bu araştırmada, 30x45x15 cm boyutlu erozyontavalarına, 8 mm'den elenmiş tınlı, kumlu tınlı, tınlı kum ve killi tın bünyeli toprakörnekleri yerleştirilmiştir. Zeytin atığı dört farklı örtü oranında (% 0, 25, 50 ve 100)toprak yüzeyine serilerek uygulanmışlardır. Tavalara saatte 40 mm yoğunluktayapay yağış uygulanmıştır. Yağış uygulamalarından sonra elde edilen yüzey akışve toprak kaybı hesaplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; zeytin atığı örtüoranı, yüzey akışı ve toprak kayıplarını önemli düzeylerde azaltmıştır. Buaraştırmada zeytin atığı uygulamasının çok düşük yüzey kaplama oranında bileyüzey akış ve toprak kayıplarının azaltılmasında etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÖNTER, G., SINKPEHOUN, T. H. (2022). Toprak Yüzeyine Uygulanan Zeytin Atığı Uygulamasının Yapay Yağmurlayıcı Koşulları Altında Yüzey kış ve Toprak Kaybı Üzerine Etkileri. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 125–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/496474

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akalan, İ. 1967. Toprak Fiziksel Özellikleri ve Erozyon. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı. (3-4): 490-503.
  2. Akalan, İ. 1974. Toprak ve Su Muhafazası. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 532, Ankara. Anonymous, 1993. Soil Survey Manual. United States of Department of Agricultural Handbook No: 18. United States Goverment Print Office, Washington. Anonymous, 1999. SPSS 9 for Windows User’s Guide. Copyright 1999 by SPSS Incoorparation SPSS, Chicago, IL. Benkobi, L., M.J. Tirlica, and J.L. Smith. 1993. Soil loss as affected by different combinations of surface litter and rock. Journal of Environmental Quality, 22 (4): 657-661.
  3. Bubenzer, G.D. and L.D. Meyer. 1965. Simulation of rainfall and soils for laboratory research. Transaction of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 8: 73-75. DMİ, 2013. T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. http:// www.meteoroloji.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/ilve-ilçeleristatistik.aspx. Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2014.
  4. Donjadee, S. and C. Chinnarasri. 2013. Vetifer grass mulch for prevention of runoff and soil loss. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Water Management, 166 (3): 144-151.
  5. Garcia-Lozano, B., L. Alcantara-Parras and M.T. de Albarnoz-Carrillo. 2011. Effects of oil mill wastes on surface soil properties, runoff and soil losses in tradional olive groves in southern Spain. Catena, 85: 187-193.
  6. Gardner, W.H. 1986. Methots of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. No: 9, 493-544,
  7. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Gee, G.W. and J.V. Bauder. 1986.
  8. Particle Size Analysis, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. No: 9, 383-411,
  9. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Grismer, M.E. and M.P. Hogan. 2005. Simulated rainfall evaluation of revegetation/mulch erosion control in the Lake Tahoe Basin: 3. Soil treatment effects. Land Degradation & Development, 16(5): 489-501.
  10. Hunt, N. and R. Gilkes. 1992. Farm Monitoring Handbook. The University of Western Australia: Netherlands, WA. Jordan, A., L.M. Zavala and J.Gil. 2010. Effects of mulching on soil phsical properties and runoff under semi arid conditions in southern Spain. Catena, 81(1): 77-85.
  11. Kempler, W.D. and R.C. Rosenau. 1986. Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution. In A. Klute et al., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Minerological Methods, 425-442, 2nd Edition. Agronomy Monograph. Soil Science of America, Madison, USA. Lacey, S.T. 2000. Runoff and sediment atte