Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

'Robinson' ve 'Fremont' mandarin çeşitlerinde yabancı tozlanmanın meyve verim ve kalitesine etkisi

The Effect of Cross-Pollination on Fruit Set and Quality in 'Robinson' and 'Fremont' Mandarins

Pages
107–112
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, 'Rhode Red Valencia' and 'Valencia Late' oranges for 'Robinson' mandarin and 'Midknight Valencia' orange, and 'Rio Red' grapefruit for Fremont mandarin, were determined as the best crossings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Previous studies on cross-pollination of Citrus varieties have shown the existence of a wide variation in fruit set ratio, fruit size, and number of seeds per fruit with different pollinators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the current study, the effects of four pollinator cultivars ('Rhode Red Valencia', 'Midknight Valencia', and 'Valencia Late' oranges and 'Rio Red' grapefruit) on the fruit set, and some fruit quality characters of 'Robinson' and 'Fremont' mandarin cultivars were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, 'Rhode Red Valencia' and 'Valencia Late' oranges for 'Robinson' mandarin and 'Midknight Valencia' orange, and 'Rio Red' grapefruit for Fremont mandarin, were determined as the best crossings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Previous studies on cross-pollination of Citrus varieties have shown the existence of a wide variation in fruit set ratio, fruit size, and number of seeds per fruit with different pollinators. In the current study, the effects of four pollinator cultivars ('Rhode Red Valencia', 'Midknight Valencia', and 'Valencia Late' oranges and 'Rio Red' grapefruit) on the fruit set, and some fruit quality characters of 'Robinson' and 'Fremont' mandarin cultivars were determined. The experimental setup was a complete randomized design with three replications of each combination. The effects of cross-pollination on fruit set and pomological characters, such as fruit weight, total soluble solids (TSS), TSS:TA (total acids) ratio, and number of seeds per fruit were statistically significant. At maturity, female parent cultivars’ flowers that were cross-pollinated with 'Valencia Late' orange, had the highest fruit set with 23.08% and 21.57%, respectively. The heaviest fruits of 'Robinson' mandarin were obtained by cross-pollination with 'Rhode Red Valencia' orange. Avarege fruit weight from open-pollinated was higher than those from cross-pollination in 'Fremont' mandarin. According to the results, 'Rhode Red Valencia' and 'Valencia Late' oranges for 'Robinson' mandarin and 'Midknight Valencia' orange, and 'Rio Red' grapefruit for Fremont mandarin, were determined as the best crossings.

Özet

Farklı turunçgil tür ve çeşitlerinde yapılan tozlama çalışmaları, farklı tozlayıcıların meyve tutum oranı, meyve iriliği ve meyve başına tohum sayısı üzerine etkilerinin oldukça geniş bir varyasyon gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu çalışmada, 'Robinson' ve 'Fremont' mandarin çeşitlerinin meyve tutumu ve bazı meyve kalite özellikleri üzerine dört farklı tozlayıcı çeşidin ('Rhode Red Valencia', 'Midknight Valencia' ve 'Valencia Late' portakalları ile 'Rio Red' altıntopu) etkileri araştırılmıştır. Denemede her bir çeşit Tesadüf Parselleri Deneme Desenine göre 3 tekerrürlü olarak yer almıştır. Meyve tutumu ile meyve ağırlığı, suda çözünebilir kuru madde (SÇKM) miktarı, SÇKM/Asit oranı, meyve başına tohum miktarı gibi pomolojik özellikler üzerine tozlayıcıların etkisi istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuştur. Olgunluk döneminde her iki ana ebevyn çeşidinde de en yüksek meyve tutumu sırasıyla %23.08 ve %21.57 ile 'Valencia Late' portakalı ile melezlendiğinde elde edilmiştir. 'Robinson' mandarininde en ağır meyveler 'Rhode Red Valencia' melezinden elde edilmişken, 'Fremont' mandarininde serbest tozlanma koşularında melezlemeye göre daha büyük meyveler alınmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, en iyi tozlayıcılar 'Robinson' mandarini için 'Rhode Red Valencia' ve 'Valencia Late' çeşitleri, Fremont mandarini için ise 'Midknight Valencia' ve 'Rio Red' çeşitleri olmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, E., KAPLANKIRAN, M. (2022). 'Robinson' ve 'Fremont' mandarin çeşitlerinde yabancı tozlanmanın meyve verim ve kalitesine etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 107–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/496471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akgul, F. and O. Tuzcu. 1993. The effect of different citrus rootstocks on the fruit yield and quality of 'Clementine', Satsuma and 'Fremont' mandarin cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 17:359-371. Anonymous, 2013. http://fao.org/page/collections?subset=agriculture.
  2. Barry, GH. and S. Roux. 2010. Preharvest foliar sprays of prohexadione–calcium, a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, induce chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid synthesis in citrus rinds. HortScience, 45:242-247.
  3. Chao, CCT. 2005. Pollination study of mandarins and the effect on seediness and fruit size: Implications for seedless mandarin production. HortScience, 40:362-365.
  4. Davies, FS. and LG. Albrigo. 1994.
  5. Citrus. CABI Publication, Florida, USA. 254 p. Demir, G, Turgutoglu, E. and Kurt, S. 2015. The variation of fruit quality at different pollination combinations in Batem Sarısı and Batem Pınarı lemon varieties. (in Turkish with an English summary). 7th National Symposium on Horticulture (25-29
  6. August, Turkey), p. 608-612.
  7. Demirkeser, TH., S. Eti and M. Kaplankiran. 2001. The effects of self and cross-pollination on the fruit set and quality of 'Nova' mandarin. 6th International Congress of Citrus Nurserymen (9- 17 July, Brazil), p. 305-308.
  8. Demirkeser, TH, M. Kaplankiran, C. Toplu and E. Yildiz. 2009. Yield and fruit quality performance of 'Nova' and 'Robinson' mandarins on three rootstocks in Eastern Mediterranean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4:262-268.
  9. Domingues, Eta and NA. Tulmann. 1999. Influence of pollination and floral morphology on fruit setting in sweet orange varieties. Scientia Agricola, 56:163-170.
  10. Eken, I. 2006. The effects of different pollinators on fruit set and fruit quality in Robinson mandarin. Cukurova University, Ms Thesis 76 p. (in Turkish). El-Otmani, M., CW. Coggins, M., Agusti and CL. Lovatt. 2000. Plant growth regulators in citriculture: World current uses. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 19:395-447.
  11. Eti, S., M. Kilavuz and N. Kaska. 1989 The effect on fruit set and quality of self and cross pollination in 'Robinson' mandarin (in Turkish with an English summary). Bahce, 18:62-68.
  12. Fang, JG., J. Wu, YS. Zheng and CT. Chao. 2008. Cross pollination, seediness, and stimulated parthenocarpy of 'Nules' Clementine, 'Fina Sodea' Clementine and 'W. Murcott' mandarin. 11th International Citrus Congress (26-30
  13. October, China), p. 26-30.
  14. Ferraro, AE., RM. Pio and FA. Azevedo. 2006. Pollination influence of sweet orange varieties on 'Nov