Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Urological laparoscopic procedures and results performed by a single urologist in a secondary state hospital

İkinci basamak devlet hastanesinde tek ürolog tarafından gerçekleştirilen ürolojik laparoskopik prosedürler ve sonuçları

Pages
291–297
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All patients had a trace amount of drains (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the results of urological laparoscopic operations performed by a single surgeon in secondary public hospital Materials and Methods: The data of 30 patients who underwent urological laparoscopic surgery in Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital between January 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in 15 patients, dismembred pyeloplasty in 4 patients, ureterolithotomy in 8 patients, and cyst excision in 3 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All patients had a trace amount of drains (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the results of urological laparoscopic operations performed by a single surgeon in secondary public hospital Materials and Methods: The data of 30 patients who underwent urological laparoscopic surgery in Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital between January 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation type, duration of operation, side, removal time of drain, length of stay in the hospital and complications were noted. Results: All patients underwent laparoscopy via transperitoneal route. Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in 15 patients, dismembred pyeloplasty in 4 patients, ureterolithotomy in 8 patients, and cyst excision in 3 patients. The mean patient age was 40.43 + 16.72 (14-76). A male/female ratio of 13/17 was found to be 43.3% male and 56.7% female. Considering the operation times, nephrectomy was 173.26 (120-240) minutes, pyeloplasty 240 ± (210-270) minutes, ureterolithotomy 110.75 (75-180) minutes, and cyst excision 112.66 (100-138) minutes. All patients had a trace amount of drains (

Özet

Amaç: İkinci basamak devlet hastanesinde tek ürolog tarafından gerçekleştirilen ürolojik laparoskopik operasyonların sonuçlarını irdelemek Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2018 – Ocak 2021 yılları arasında Şanlıurfa Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde ürolojik laparoskopik cerrahi geçiren 30 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Operasyon tipi, ameliyat süreleri, taraf, dren süreleri, hastanede kalış süreleri ve komplikasyonları not edildi. Bulgular: Tüm hastalara transperitoneal yolla laparoskopi yapıldı. On beş hastaya laparoskopik nefrektomi, 4 hastaya dismembred piyeloplasti, 8 hastaya üreterolitotomi, 3 hastaya ise kist eksizyonu uygulandı. Ortalama hasta yaşı 40,43 + 16,72 (14-76) saptandı. Erkek/kadın oranı 13/17 olmak üzere %43,3 erkek ve %56,7 kadın saptandı. Operasyon sürelerine bakıldığında nefrektomi 173,26 (120-240) dk. piyeloplasti 240 ± (210-270) dk. üreterolitotomi 110,75 (75-180) dk. kist eksizyonu 112,66 (100-138) dk. saptandı. Tüm hastaların drenaj miktarları eser miktarda (

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHÇECİ, T. (2022). Urological laparoscopic procedures and results performed by a single urologist in a secondary state hospital. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 291–297. https://ajindex.com/articles/496030

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Griffith DO, Schussler WW, Vancaille TH. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: A low morbidity alternative for staging pelvic malignancies. J. Endourol 1990
  2. 86 2- Clayman: Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1991
  3. 282 3- Schuessler W, Kavoussi L, Clayman R, Vancaille T. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1992
  4. Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 1992
  5. Keeley FX, Gıalas I, Pıllaı M, Chrisofos M, Tolley DA. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: The Edinburgh experience. BJU International 1999
  6. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS, Shah BC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for multiple upper mid ureteral calculi. J Urol 1994
  7. 1002 7- Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993
  8. 150 (6): 1795-9. 8- Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001
  9. Abdelshehid CS, Eichel L, Lee D, Uribe C, Boker J, Basillote J et al. Current trends in urologic laparoscopic surgery. J Endourol 2005
  10. 15–20. 10- Kijvikai K, Patcharatrakul S. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Its role and some controversial technical considerations. Int J Urol 2006
  11. 13 (3): 206-10. 11- McAllister M, Bhayani SB, Ong A et al. Vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature. J Urol 2004
  12. 172 (1): 183-5. 12- Vallancien G,Cathelıneau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology:review of 1311 procedures at a single center.J Urol 2002
  13. 168 (1): 23-6. 13- Parsons JK, Varkarakis I, Rha KH, Jarrett TW
  14. Pinto P, Kavoussi LR. Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five-year analysis.Urology 2004
  15. 63 (1): 27-32. 14- Meraney AM, Samee AA, Gill IS. Vascular and bowel complications during retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 2002
  16. 19 15- Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol 1999
  17. Hatipoğlu NK, Penbegül N, Söylemez H, Atar M, Bozkurt Y, Sancaktutar AA et al. Ürolojik Laparoskopik Cerrahi: Dicle üniversitesindeki ilk 100 deneyimimiz. J Clin Exp