SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery

Makuler hol cerrahisinin anatomik ve fonksiyonel başarısını etkileyen parametreler

Esin KIRIKKAYA
Süleyman KAYNAK
Pages
434–443
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

BCVA improved significantly after MHS (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the effect of preoperative Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) parameters on macular hole surgery (MHS) and their predictive value for postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 30 eyes of 30 patients with macular hole (MH).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:BCVA improved significantly after MHS (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of preoperative Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) parameters on macular hole surgery (MHS) and their predictive value for postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 30 eyes of 30 patients with macular hole (MH). All patients underwent pars plana 23-gauge vitrectomy. A detailed macular analysis including MH minimum diameter (MD), base diameter (BD), opening diameter (OD), height, nasal arm (NA), temporal arm (TA), macular hole index (MHI), diameter hole index (DHI), tractional hole index (THI), hole form factor (HHF), macular hole area (MHA), and macular hole volume (MHV) were performed preoperatively. Presence of inner segment–outer segment (IS/OS) line, external limiting membrane (ELM), and cyst was noted postoperatively. Relationships between these parameters and postoperative BCVA were evaluated. Results: The study group comprised 25 (83.3%) women. Mean pre and postoperative BCVA values were 0.924±0.320 and 0.487±0.287 logMAR, respectively. BCVA improved significantly after MHS (p

Özet

Amaç: Preoperatif Spectral Domain Optik Koherens Tomografi (SD-OKT) parametrelerinin makuler hol cerrahisi (MHC) üzerindeki etkisini ve bu parametrelerin postoperatif en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EİDGK) için tahmini değerini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya makuler holü (MH) olan 30 hastanın 30 gözü dahil edildi. Tüm hastalara 23-gauge pars plana vitrektomi uygulandı. Preoperatif olarak minimum çap (MÇ), taban çapı (TÇ), açılış çapı (AÇ), yükseklik, nazal kol (NK), temporal kol (TK), makuler hol indeksi (MHİ), çap hol indeksi (ÇHİ), traksiyonel hol indeksi (THİ), hol form faktörü (HFF), makuler hol alanı (MHA) ve makuler hol hacmi (MHV) içeren detaylı bir makula analizi yapıldı. Postoperatif olarak iç-dış segment (IS/OS) bandı, external limitan membran (ELM) ve kist varlığı belirtildi. Bu parametreler ile postoperatif EİDGK arasındaki ilişkiler değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışma grubu 25 (%83,3) kadından oluşuyordu. Pre-postoperatif ortalama EİDGK değerleri sırasıyla 0,924±0,320 ve 0,487±0,287 logMAR idi. EİDGK, MHC'den sonra anlamlı derecede arttı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRIKKAYA, E., KAYNAK, S. (2022). Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 434–443. https://ajindex.com/articles/496000

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, et al. The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 2611-9
  2. Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, et al. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 390-3
  3. Oh J, Smiddy W, Flynn H, et al. Photoreceptor inner/outer segment defect imaging by spectral domain OCT and visual prognosis after macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 1651-8
  4. Ooka E, Mitamura Y, Baba T, et al. Foveal Microstructure on Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomographic Images and Visual Function After Macular Hole Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 152 (2):283- 90
  5. Wilczyński T, Heinke A, Niedzielska-Krycia A, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography features in patients with idiopathic full-thickness macular hole, before and after surgical treatment. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2019; 14: 505-14
  6. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Nawrocki J. Continuous changes in macular morphology after macular hole closure visualized with spectral optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1249-55
  7. Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, et al. Restoration of the photoreceptor outer segment and visual outcomes after macular hole closure: spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1469-76
  8. Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, et al. Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1438-46
  9. Wakabayashi T, Fujiwara M, Sakaguchi H, et al. Foveal microstructure and visual acuity in surgically closed macular holes: spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic analysis. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1815-24
  10. Bottoni F, De Angelis S, Luccarelli S, et al. The dynamic healing process of idiopathic macular holes after surgical repair: a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 4439-46
  11. Kusuhara S, Teraoka Escaño MF, Fujii S, et al. Prediction of postoperative visual outcome based on hole configuration by optical coherence tomography in eyes with idiopathic macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138 (5): 709-16
  12. Ruiz-Moreno JM, Staicu C, Piñero DP, et al. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92 (5): 640-4
  13. Kumagai